KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / IOJET / 2020 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 4

THE IMPACT OF ELLIPSES ON READING COMPREHENSION

Nihat BAYAT
Dergi
IOJET
Sayfa
1410–1426
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

However, it was also found that ellipses in theform of subject and indirect object did not significantly predict reading comprehension.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This study aimed to detect the extent to which comprehending elliptical structures predictedreading comprehension.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The study utilized a correlational survey model, and participantsinvolved a total of 173 middle school students.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:However, it was also found that ellipses in theform of subject and indirect object did not significantly predict reading comprehension.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:2019 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

This study aimed to detect the extent to which comprehending elliptical structures predictedreading comprehension. The study utilized a correlational survey model, and participantsinvolved a total of 173 middle school students. Data were collected through two different toolsbased on the same text in 2019. The ellipsis comprehension test consisted of 40 items thatincluded various types of elliptical structures present in the text. These items were in the formof fill-in-the-blanks. The reading comprehension test that was developed based on the sametext comprised 21 items in the form of multiple-choice items. The tests were administered tothe participants every other day. During the data analysis, a simple linear regression analysiswas performed to reveal the extent to which the ellipsis comprehension ability predictedreading comprehension, and a multiple linear regression analysis was employed to reveal theextent to which the sub-dimensions of ellipsis comprehension ability predicted readingcomprehension. Enter method was used in the regression analysis. Findings showed thatellipsis comprehension was a significant predictor of reading comprehension. The ellipticalsub-dimensions predicting reading comprehension the best appeared to be the ellipses in theform of verb, object and determinative units. However, it was also found that ellipses in theform of subject and indirect object did not significantly predict reading comprehension.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

BAYAT, N. (2022). THE IMPACT OF ELLIPSES ON READING COMPREHENSION. IOJET, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 4, 1410–1426. https://ajindex.com/articles/542224

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (10)

  1. Aelbrecht, L. (2010). The syntactic licensing of ellipsis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Altman, R. (2008). A theory of narrative. New York: Columbia University Press Arregui, A., Clifton, C., Frazier, L., & Moulton, K. (2006). Processing elided verb phrases with flawed antecedents: The recycling hypothesis. Journal of Memory and Language, 55(2), 232-246.
  2. Baddeley, A. D. (1986).
  3. Working memory. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  4. Beaugrande, R.A. de. & Dressler, W.U. (1981). Introduction to Text Linguistics. Longman: London. Beavers, J. & Sag, I.A. (2004). Coordinate Ellipsis and Apparent Non-Constituent Coordination. In S. Müller (ed), Proceedings of the HPSG04 Conference. Stanford: CSLI on-line Publications. Beck, I. L., McKeown, M. G., Omanson, R. C. & Pople, M. T. (1984) Improving the comprehensibility of stories: The effects of revisions that improve coherence, Reading Research Quarterly, 19(3), 263–277.
  5. Beck, I. L., McKeown, M. G., Sinatra, G. M. & Loxterman, J. A. (1991) Revising social studies text from a text processing perspective: Evidence of improved comprehensibility, Reading Research Quarterly, 26(3), 251–276.
  6. Cain, K., & Oakhill, J. (2007). Reading comprehension difficulties: Correlates, causes, and consequences. In K. Cain & J. Oakhill (Eds.), Children’s comprehension problems: Oral and written language (pp. 41–75).
  7. New York, NY: Guildford. Chomsky, N. (1971). Syntactic Structures. Printing & Binding: Werner Hildebrand, Berlin, Germany. Chung, S, Ladusaw, W.A., & McCloskey, J. (1995). Sluicing and logical form. Natural Language Semantics, 3, 239–282.
  8. Cohen, V. L. & Cowen, J. E. (2008). Literacy for children in an information age: Teaching, reading, writing, and thinking. Belmont, CA: Thompson Higher Education. Crystal, D. (1992). Introducing Linguistics. London: Penguin English. Crystal, D. (1980). A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics. Oxford: Blackwell Publications. Culicover, P.W. & Jackendoff, R. (2005). Simpler Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  9. Dalrymple, M., Shieber, S.M., & Pereira, F.C.N. (1991). Ellipsis and higher-order unification. Linguistics and Philosophy, 14, 399-452.
  10. Depiante, M. (2000). The syntax of deep and surface anaphora: A study of null complement anaphora and stripping/bare argument ellipsis. University of Connecticut dissertation. Duke, N. (2003). Comprehension instruction for informational text. Presentation at the annual meeting of the Michigan Reading Association, Grand Rapids, MI. Eskey, D. (1988). “Hol