KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / IOJET / 2021 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2

HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS’ READINESS FOR DISTANCE LEARNING

Ali AKDOĞAN
Dergi
IOJET
Sayfa
622–637
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Meanwhile, high school students are those who had study habit reached greater point from HDR scale than high school students who had not study habit (t (188) = 5.29, p = .00,d=.08).

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The purpose of this study was to determine high school students for distance learning.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The participants of the study comprised 191 high school students who were selected using randomly sampling model.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Meanwhile, high school students are those who had study habit reached greater point from HDR scale than high school students who had not study habit (t (188) = 5.29, p = .00,d=.08).
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine high school students for distance learning. Mainly due to the study a multidimensional instrument for high students’ readiness for distance learning (HRD) developed and validated. The study adopted qualitative research method based on quantitative data. The participants of the study comprised 191 high school students who were selected using randomly sampling model. The data were collected via readiness for distance learning scale (HRD) and analyzed using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to establish the construct validity of the HRD model. In addition, a series of one-way ANOVA were conducted to investigate the effect of demographic variables on readiness of distance learning. Through confirmatory factor analysis, HRD was validated in three dimensions: communication, access and motivation. In this study, high school students’ mean scores in three dimensions are all higher than the theoretical mean of 3, ranging from 3.60 to 4.37 on a 5-point scale as X̄= 40.64 (SS=8.80).This finding means that the current study’s sample of high school students has the highest readiness in the dimension of access X̄=16.98 (SS=4.64), followed by motivation X̄=12.86 (SS=4.66); communication X̄=10.79 (SS=2.45. The significant differences were observed that high school students are those who study at 9. grade had greater readiness than high school students are those who study at 11. grade in high schools whereas high school students are those who study at 11. grade in high schools had greater readiness than high school students are those who study at 10. and 12. grade in high schools according to means score of HDR. It was also found out that perception of students’ self-confidence while using computer caused significant statistical differences in three dimensions of HRD; the students who had higher level (very good, good) of selfconfident while using computer exhibited significantly greater readiness than those who had lower level of self-confident while using confidence. Meanwhile, high school students are those who had study habit reached greater point from HDR scale than high school students who had not study habit (t (188) = 5.29, p = .00,d=.08).

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

AKDOĞAN, A. (2022). HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS’ READINESS FOR DISTANCE LEARNING. IOJET, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2, 622–637. https://ajindex.com/articles/542177

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (11)

  1. Aydm,C.H. &Tasci, D. (2005). Measuring readiness for e-Learning: reflections from an emerging country. Educational Technology and Society, 8( 4), 244-257.
  2. Chinaza, N. K., Chimezie, B. A., Juliana, A. & Efeyaelu, U.H. (2015).
  3. Computer Selfefficacy, Computer-related Technology Dependence and On-line Learning Readiness of Undergraduate Students. International Journal of Higher Education Management, 1(2), 60-71.
  4. Deci, E., & Ryan, R. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum Press Federico, P. (2000). Learning styles and student attitudes toward various aspects of networkbased instruction. Computers in Human Behavior, 16(4), 359–379.
  5. Gaide, S. (2004, September 1). Student orientation at Tarleton State takes the distance out of distance education.Distance Education Report, 4. Garrison, D. R. (2005). Quality and Access in Distance Education: Theoretical Considerations. In D. Keegan (Ed.), Theoretical Principles of Distance Education (pp. 8-19). NewYork: Routledge. Garrison, D. R., Cleveland-Innes, M., & Fung, T. (2004). Student role adjustment in online communities of inquiry: model and instrument validation. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 8(2), 61–74.
  6. Hsu, Y. C., & Shiue, Y. M. (2005). The effect of self-directed learning readiness on achievement comparing face-to-face and two-way distance learning instruction. International Journal of Instructional Media, 32(2), 143–156.
  7. Hung, M.L., Chou, C., Chen, C.H., & Own, Z.Y. (2010). Learner Readiness for Online Learning: Scale Development and Student Perceptions. Computers & Education, 55, 1080-1090
  8. Johnson, S. D., & Aragon, S. R. (2003). An instructional strategy framework for online learning environments. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 100, 31-43
  9. Kay, R. H. (2009). Examining gender differences in attitudes toward interactive classroom communications systems (ICCS). Computers & Education, 52(4), 730–740
  10. Ko, S. Rossen, S. (2010). Teaching Online: A Practical Guide. NewYork: Routledge. Kerr, M.S., Rynearson, K. & Kerr, M.C. (2006). Student Characteristics for Online Learning Success. Internet and Higher Education 9, 91-105.
  11. Knowles.M. (2010). Online learning readiness assessment. Retrieved September 23, from www. erskineseminary.org. McVay, M. (2000). Developing a web-based distance student orientation to enhance student success in an online bachelor’s degree completion program. Unpublished practicum report presented to the Ed.D. Program. Fl