Dergiler / IOJET / 2022 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2

BOOSTING STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION ATTAINMENT WITH FLIPPED CLASSROOM MODEL: A PILOT STUDY AT STATE POLYTECHNIC OF SRIWIJAYA

Dergi
IOJET
Sayfa
871–883
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Pre-test scores of both groups compared by using independent t-test revealed no significant difference between these groups (.505>.05), while post-test scores of both groups showed significant difference (.000

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The study investigated the impact of the flipped classroom on the second semester students in accounting class.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Participants (n=50) were assigned to a control group (using traditional instruction) or an experimental group (using flipped classroom model).
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Pre-test scores of both groups compared by using independent t-test revealed no significant difference between these groups (.505>.05), while post-test scores of both groups showed significant difference (.000
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:2021-2022 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

The study investigated the impact of the flipped classroom on the second semester students in accounting class. Participants (n=50) were assigned to a control group (using traditional instruction) or an experimental group (using flipped classroom model). A quasi-experiment in reading comprehension course on the second semester in academic year 2021-2022 was used. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Shapiro-Wilk test were .083 and .156 for pre-test control group, .200 and .787 for post-test control group, .119 and .185 for pre-test experimental group, and .095 and .101 for post-test experimental group suggesting normal distributions (p>.05). Homogeneity tests based on mean, median, median and with adjusted df, and trimmed mean were .857, .827, .827, and .857 indicating that Homogeneity tests were >.05. Pre-test scores of both groups compared by using independent t-test revealed no significant difference between these groups (.505>.05), while post-test scores of both groups showed significant difference (.000

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ARDINSYAH, W., MERIANI, W., Risnawati, R. (2022). BOOSTING STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION ATTAINMENT WITH FLIPPED CLASSROOM MODEL: A PILOT STUDY AT STATE POLYTECHNIC OF SRIWIJAYA. IOJET, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2, 871–883. https://ajindex.com/articles/542111

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (8)

  1. Abeysekera, L., & Dawson, P. (2015). Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: definition, rationale and a call for research. Higher Education Research and Development, 34(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2014.934 336 Alyousef, Hesham Suleiman. (2006). Teaching reading comprehension to ESL/EFL learners. Journal of Language and Learning, 5(1), 63-73. Retrieved on Nov 1, 2021 from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235771368_Teaching_reading_comprehension_t o_ESLEFL_learners/link/00463514d0e2b8f675000000/download Al‐Zahrani, A. M. (2015). From passive to active: The impact of the flipped classroom through social learning platforms on higher education students' creative thinking. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(6), 1133-1148.
  2. Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Before you flip, consider this. Phi Delta Kappan, 94(2), 25. Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Bishop, J. L., & Verleger, M. A. (2013), The flipped classroom: A Survey of the research. In Walter W.B (Ed), Proceedings of Research, Computer in Education: 20th American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition (pp. 1-18).
  3. Atlanta, Georgia. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--22585
  4. Borchardt, J., & Bozer, A. H. (2017). Psychology course redesign: An interactive approach to learning in a micro-flipped classroom. Smart Learning Environments, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-017-0049-3
  5. Brame, C., (2013). Flipping the classroom. Vanderbilt University Center for Teaching. Retrieved from http://cft.vanderbilt.edu/ guides-sub-pages/flipping-the-classroom/ Brunsell, E., & Horejsi, M. (2011). Flipping your classroom. Learning and Leading with Technology, 78(2), 10. Chen Hsieh, J.S., Wu, W.C.V., & Marek, M.W. (2017). Using the flipped classroom to enhance EFL learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(1–2), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2015.1111910
  6. Deslauriers, L., & Wieman, C. (2011). Learning and retention of quantum concepts with different teaching methods. Physical review special topics-physics education research, 7, 1-6.
  7. Drake, Lynne, Micaela Kayser, & Robin Jacobowitz. (2016). The Flipped classroom: An approach to teaching and learning. Retrieved from https://www.newpaltz.edu/media/thebenjamin-center/P.Brief_2020Vision-Flipped%20classroom.pdf
  8. Elmaadaway, M. A. N. (2018). The effects of a flipped