KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / International Online Journal of Primary Education / 2020 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2

EXPLORING STUDENT “FLOW” WITH 1:1 TECHNOLOGY

Kathryn L. LUBNIEWSKI
Kimberly A. KIRALY
Sayfa
337–354
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Lessons that result in states of flow reflect the highest levels of engagement and 21st century skills, which are promoted by the use of 1:1 technology.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Students live in a technology-rich environment, which aids in shaping their learning and access to information.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The exploration of technology’s impact on student engagement seeks to provide a better understanding of the shared traits between lessons that effectively integrated 1:1 technology into the classroom.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Lessons that result in states of flow reflect the highest levels of engagement and 21st century skills, which are promoted by the use of 1:1 technology.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Students live in a technology-rich environment, which aids in shaping their learning and access to information. A teacher’s instructional challenge lies in creating a bridge between students’ capacity to learn and the resources at their fingertips. The focus of this study was to investigate the impact technology use has within the classroom in relation to its impact on student-monitored self-engagement and teacher-monitored engagement. The exploration of technology’s impact on student engagement seeks to provide a better understanding of the shared traits between lessons that effectively integrated 1:1 technology into the classroom. Survey data was collected from student self-reports and two forms of teacher observation. Lessons that result in states of flow reflect the highest levels of engagement and 21st century skills, which are promoted by the use of 1:1 technology.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

LUBNIEWSKI, K. L., KIRALY, K. A. (2022). EXPLORING STUDENT “FLOW” WITH 1:1 TECHNOLOGY. International Online Journal of Primary Education, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2, 337–354. https://ajindex.com/articles/542070

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (7)

  1. Apple Classrooms of Tomorrow (2006). 1 to 1 learning. Retrieved September 15, 2019, from http://windhamsd.org/whs/1_to_1_Research_Metiri_Group.pdf
  2. Back Channel (2014). In Oxford English Dictionary (2nd ed.). Retrieved September 9, 2019, from Oxford English Dictionary Online database. Barrios, T. (2004). Laptops for learning. Final Report and Recommendations of the Laptops for Learning Task Force, Florida Department of Education. Retrieved on October 14, 2016 from http://etc.usf.edu/l4l/report.pdf
  3. Bebell, D., & O’Dwyer, L. (2010). Educational outcomes and research from 1:1 computing settings. The Journal of Technology, Learning and Assessment, 9(1), 3-14.
  4. Bielefeldt, T. (2006). Teaching, learning, and one-to-one computing. Paper presented at the National Educational Computing Conference, San Diego, CA. Bridgeland, J., Dilulio, J. J., & Morrison, K. (2006). The silent epidemic: Perspectives of high school dropouts. A report by Civic Enterprises in association with Peter D. Hart Research Associates for the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Washington, DC: Civic Enterprises. Bowen, E. (2005). Student engagement and its relation to quality work design: A review of the literature. Retrieved on October 10, 2019 from http://chiron.valdosta.edu/are/ebowenLitReview.pdf
  5. Carver, L. B. (2016, Jan). Teacher perception of barriers and benefits in K-12 technology usage. Turksih Online Journal of Educational Technology, 15(1), 110-116.
  6. Claxton, G. (2007). Expanding young people’s capacity to learn. British Journal of Educational Studies, 55(2), 1-20.
  7. Clesson, K. M. (2011). Backchannegling, communication apprehension, and student engagement in discussion-based high school classes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Illinois State University, Bloomington-Normal, IL. Cohen, B., & Lea, R. (2004). Essentials of statistics for the social and behavioral sciences. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. Costa, J. (2012). Digital learning for all now: A school leader’s guide for 1:1 on a budget. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Connell, J. P., & Broom, J. (2004). The toughest nut to crack: First Things First’s (FTF) Approach to improving teaching and learning. Retrieved on October 1, 2019, from: http://www.irre.org/sites/default/files/publication_pdfs/The% 20Toughest%20Nut%20to%20Crack.pdf Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York, NY: Harper Perennial. Dawson, K., & Cavanaugh, C. (2006). Florida’s EETT Leveraging laptops initiative and its impact on teaching practices.