KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / International Online Journal of Primary Education / 2021 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1

THE CONCEPT OF ANGLE IN TURKISH AND SINGAPOREAN PRIMARY SCHOOL MATHEMATICS TEXTBOOKS: DYNAMIC OR STATIC?

Suphi Önder BÜTÜNER
Sayfa
89–105
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The findings showed that the contents of Singaporean textbooks offer students more opportunities than Turkish textbooks in learning about the angle as a static and dynamic concept.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The present study compared Turkish and Singaporean textbooks with respect to their instructional contents on a difficult topic for most students: the concept of angle.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The study used the 3rd and 4th grade mathematics textbooks taught in Turkish and Singaporean schools.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The findings showed that the contents of Singaporean textbooks offer students more opportunities than Turkish textbooks in learning about the angle as a static and dynamic concept.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

The present study compared Turkish and Singaporean textbooks with respect to their instructional contents on a difficult topic for most students: the concept of angle. The study used the 3rd and 4th grade mathematics textbooks taught in Turkish and Singaporean schools. The analysis showed that Turkish textbooks defined the angle as a static concept, and Singaporean textbooks defined it as both a static and dynamic concept. The definitions of the concept of angle included in the textbooks reflect on the representation of the angle, instructional tools and problems. Turkish students learn angle from textbooks only as a static concept, so they may have difficulties and misconceptions about the subject and related concepts. The findings showed that the contents of Singaporean textbooks offer students more opportunities than Turkish textbooks in learning about the angle as a static and dynamic concept.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

BÜTÜNER, S. Ö. (2022). THE CONCEPT OF ANGLE IN TURKISH AND SINGAPOREAN PRIMARY SCHOOL MATHEMATICS TEXTBOOKS: DYNAMIC OR STATIC?. International Online Journal of Primary Education, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1, 89–105. https://ajindex.com/articles/542062

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (11)

  1. Alajmi, A. H. (2012). How do elementary textbooks address fractions? A review of mathematics textbooks in the USA, Japan, and Kuwait. Education Studies in Mathematics, 79(2), 239–261.
  2. Argün, Z., Arıkan, A., Bulut, S., & Halıcıoğlu, S. (2014). Temel matematik kavramların künyesi [Identification of basic mathematical concepts]. Ankara:
  3. Gazi Publishing. Barmby, P., Bilsborough, L., Harries, T., & Higgins, S. (2009). Primary mathematics: teaching for understanding. NY: McGraw Hill. Baya’a, N., Daher, W., & Mahagna, S. (2017). The effect of collaborative computerized learning using GeoGebra on the development of concept images of the angle among seventh graders (pp.208-215). In G. Aldon & J. Trgalova (Eds.), Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Technology in Mathematics Teaching (ICTMT 13), Lyon, France: Ecole Normale Sup´erieure de Lyon. Bingölbali, E. (2016). Kavram tanımı ve kavram imajı. (In; Matematik Eğitiminde Teoriler, Ed, Bingölbali, E., Arslan, S., and Zembat, İ. Ö.). p. 136-148. Ankara:
  4. Pegem Akademi. Boo, J. Y., & Leong, K. E. (2016). Teaching and learning of Geometry in Primary School using GeoGebra. Proceedings of the 21st Asian Technology Conference in Mathematics, p. 289-300.
  5. Bütüner, S. Ö., & Filiz, M. (2017). Exploring high-achieving sixth grade students’ erroneous answers and misconceptions on the angle concept. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 48(4), 533-554.
  6. Bütüner, S. Ö. (2019). Problem analysis in Turkish and Singapore mathematics textbooks: division of fraction. Pamukkale University Journal of Education, 47, 370-394.
  7. Bütüner, S. Ö. (2020). A comparison of the instructional content on division of fractions in Turkish and Singaporean textbooks. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 51(2), 265-293.
  8. Choi, E., Kim, S. Y., & Kwon, O. N. (2019). An International Comparison study in Mathematics Curriculum - Contents for Angle among the Korea, Singapore U.K., Australia and U.S. Communications of Mathematical Education, 33(3), 295–317.
  9. Clausen-May T. (2005). Teaching maths to pupils with different learning styles. London: Paul Chapman Publishing. Clausen-May, T. (2008). Another angle on angles. Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom, 13(1), 4-8.
  10. Clements, D. H., & Battista, M. T. (1989). Learning of geometric concepts in a Logo environment. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20, 450-467.
  11. Clements, D. H., & Battista, M. T. (1990). The effect