Dergiler / International Online Journal of Primary Education / 2022 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1

A VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY STUDY OF THE CREATIVITY SUPPORTING HOME ENVIRONMENT SCALE

Sayfa
136–153
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The obtained findings demonstrate that the “Creativity-Supporting Home Environment Scale” is a valid and reliable scale.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:In this study, it is aimed to improve the “Creativity-Supporting Home Environment Scale” for the purpose of determining the level of creativity in the home environment of parents with children aged 3-6 years old.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Research study groups were composed of 500 parents across various provinces of Turkey.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The obtained findings demonstrate that the “Creativity-Supporting Home Environment Scale” is a valid and reliable scale.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

In this study, it is aimed to improve the “Creativity-Supporting Home Environment Scale” for the purpose of determining the level of creativity in the home environment of parents with children aged 3-6 years old. Research study groups were composed of 500 parents across various provinces of Turkey. The scale items written in the context of the literature were presented to field experts for their opinion in accordance with the scale’s purpose, and the content validity index was calculated as proof of the scale’s content validity (.89). A pretest application of the scale was conducted in accordance with the expert opinion, and the items were examined for their distinctiveness. A test application was conducted for the purpose of demonstrating the factor structure of the scale, and whether or not the data was appropriate for factor analysis by using KMO and Bartlett statistics. Factor analysis based upon principal component analysis was performed with the optimum application of parallel analysis, and according to both parallel analysis and scree plot, it was decided that the structure was four-dimensional. The percentage of the factors explaining the total variance was established as 49.9%. The item test correlation values of the items in each factor were found to be above .30 in accordance with the item analysis results. Two items that did not fulfill the criteria were removed from the scale by performing a confirmatory factor analysis to verify the structure. Factor loadings for 28 items in the scale were found to be higher than .30 and with error variances below .90. It was found that the McDonald’s omega coefficients were between .71 and .88, and the Composite reliability coefficients were between .70 and .84 in the calculation of the reliability of the scale scores for each of the scale’s four dimensions. For the whole scale, the stratified alpha reliability coefficient was calculated as .87. The obtained findings demonstrate that the “Creativity-Supporting Home Environment Scale” is a valid and reliable scale.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

DAĞLIOĞLU, H. E., HALAT, Z., ARACI, F. G. İ. (2022). A VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY STUDY OF THE CREATIVITY SUPPORTING HOME ENVIRONMENT SCALE. International Online Journal of Primary Education, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1, 136–153. https://ajindex.com/articles/542033

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (9)

  1. Alfonso-Benlliure, V., Meléndez, C. J., & García-Ballesteros, M. (2013). Evaluation of a creativity intervention program for preschoolers. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 10, 112-120.
  2. Alfuhaigi, S. (2015). School environment and creativity development: A review of literature. In M. Searson & M. Ochoa (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2014 - Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 1832-1837).
  3. Jacksonville, FL: AACE. Berk, L. (2001). Awakening children’s mind. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  4. Bresler, L. P., Thompson, C. P., Chapman, L., & Ayers, W. (2002). The arts in children’s lives: Context, culture and curriculum. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  5. Can Yaşar, M. C., & Aral, N. (2011). Altı yaş çocuklarının yaratıcı düşünme becerilerine sosyo-ekonomik düzey ve anne baba öğrenim düzeyinin etkisinin incelenmesi [The study of the effect of socio-economic level and parents’ educational status on creative thinking skills of six-year-old children]. Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, 4(1), 137-145.
  6. Carroll, K. L., & Tucker, J. L. (Eds.). (2007). Better practice in visual arts education: Building effective teaching through educational research. Baltimore, MD: Maryland State Department of Education. Cattell, R. B. (1978). The scientific use of factor analysis in behavioral and life sciences. New York, NY: Plenum. Çetin, Z., & Ata, S. (2020). The relationship between parents’ attachment to their parents and children’s creatives. Early Child Development and Care, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2020.1788547
  7. Craft, A., McConnon, L., & Matthews, A. (2012). Child-initiated play and professional creativity: Enabling four-year-olds’ possibility thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 7(1), 48-61.
  8. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2014, September, 17-20). Creativity in the digital era. Paper presented at the 14th European Council for High Ability Conference, Ljubljana, Slovenia. Dahmen-Wassenberg, P., Kammerle, M., Unterrainer, H. F., & Fink, A. (2016). The relation between different facets of creativity and the dark side of personality. Creativity Research Journal, 28, 60–66.
  9. DeVellis, R. F. (2016). Scale development: Theory and applications (Vol. 26). Los Angeles, CA: Sage. Elibol, F. (2021). Okul öncesinde yaratıcılık eğitiminde ailenin rolü [The role of the family in creativity education in preschool]. In E. Çelebi Öncü (Ed.), Erken çocukluk döneminde yaratıcılık ve geliştirilmesi [Creativity and development in