Dergiler / International Journal of Medical Biochemistry / 2022 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1

Estimation of measurement uncertainty of glycated hemoglobin at Atellica Solutions

Sayfa
67–70
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The laboratory tests with clinical decision limits should be presented with measurement uncertainty resu

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objectives: Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) is a commonly used laboratory test for screening, monitoring, and diagnosing diabetes mellitus (DM).
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:This study aims to estimate the measurement uncertainty (MU) of HbA1c at Siemens Atellica Solutions.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The laboratory tests with clinical decision limits should be presented with measurement uncertainty resu
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objectives: Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) is a commonly used laboratory test for screening, monitoring, and diagnosing diabetes mellitus (DM). Uncertainty is a statistical expression that shows the effects of factors arising during measurement processes and affecting the reported results. It is important to give reliable laboratory results. This study aims to estimate the measurement uncertainty (MU) of HbA1c at Siemens Atellica Solutions. Methods: Internal and external quality control results of 6 months data were used to calculate the MU according to the Clinical & Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) document EP29-A. The coefficient of variation (CV%) of the two levels of internal quality control materials was calculated. The external quality control results of 6 months data obtained from the EQAS program of Bio-Rad were used to calculate the bias. Results: The precision results of the assay were within the current National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program requirement of ≤4%. The HbA1c level above 6.5% is one of the diagnostic criteria of DM. We estimated the expanded uncertainty as 6.40% for HbA1c at the level of 6.5%. It is presented as 6.5±0.4%. Conclusion: It is important that laboratorians report accurate and reliable test results as clinicians make their decisions based on laboratory data. Laboratories should add measurement uncertainty results as a part of quality control programs. The laboratory tests with clinical decision limits should be presented with measurement uncertainty resu

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

OĞUZ, E. F., EREN, F. (2022). Estimation of measurement uncertainty of glycated hemoglobin at Atellica Solutions. International Journal of Medical Biochemistry, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1, 67–70. https://ajindex.com/articles/541391

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Galindo-Méndez M, Sánchez-López A, Cruz-Fuentes L. The estimation of uncertainty of measurement of glycated hemoglobin as an analytical performance specification and in the interpretation of its results. Clin Biochem 2019;63:92–6
  2. Bennett CM, Guo M, Dharmage SC. HbA(1c) as a screening tool for detection of Type 2 diabetes: a systematic review. Diabet Med 2007;24(4):333–43
  3. Nathan DM. Long-term complications of diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 1993;328(23):1676–85
  4. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Lancet 1998;352(9131):837–53
  5. Karnchanasorn R, Huang J, Ou HY, Feng W, Chuang LM, Chiu KC, et al. Comparison of the current diagnostic criterion of HbA1c with fasting and 2-hour plasma glucose concentration. J Diabetes Res 2016;2016:6195494
  6. Gillett MJ. International Expert Committee report on the role of the A1c assay in the diagnosis of diabetes: Diabetes Care 2009;32(7):1327–34
  7. American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes--2010. Diabetes Care 2010;33(Suppl 1):S11–61
  8. Jeppsson JO, Kobold U, Barr J, Finke A, Hoelzel W, Hoshino T, et al; International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC). Approved IFCC reference method for the measurement of HbA1c in human blood. Clin Chem Lab Med 2002;40(1):78–89
  9. International Organization for Standardization (ISO). 15189:2012. Medical laboratories – requirements for quality and competence. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO; 2012. Available at: https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:15189:ed-3:v2:en. Accessed Dec 27, 2021
  10. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Expression of measurement uncertainty in laboratory medicine; approved guideline. EP29-A. Wayne, PA: CLSI; 2012
  11. Haeckel R, Wosniok W, Gurr E, Peil B. Permissible limits for uncertainty of measurement in laboratory medicine. Clin Chem Lab Med 2015;53(8):1161–71
  12. Little RR, Rohlfing CL, Sacks DB; National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program (NGSP) Steering Committee. Status of hemoglobin A1c measurement and goals for improvement: from chaos to order for improving diabetes care. Clin Chem 2011;57(2):205–14
  13. Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group, Nathan DM, Genuth S, Lachin J, Cleary P, Crofford O, et al. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and pro