Dergiler / International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering / 2022 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1

Evaluation of Project Management Methodologies Success Factors Using Fuzzy Cognitive Map Method: Waterfall, Agile, And Lean Six Sigma Cases

Sayfa
35–43
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

FCM is a suitable tool to solve this problem since it considers positive and negative relationships, causal links among criteria with their direction, and it is applicable in the absence of crisp data.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:A methodology for project management refers to a set of guidelines that defines how to work and communicate while working as a project member.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Lean Six Sigma is the combination of the main strategies of Six Sigma and Lean.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:FCM is a suitable tool to solve this problem since it considers positive and negative relationships, causal links among criteria with their direction, and it is applicable in the absence of crisp data.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

A methodology for project management refers to a set of guidelines that defines how to work and communicate while working as a project member. Waterfall practice is the old methodology. As a response to dealing with the difficulty of software development, it has turned out to the most widely utilized methodologies of project management in the software and management industries. Oher software development focused project management method, Agile, has appeared as a response to the shortcoming of Waterfall tool for handling complex projects. Lean Six Sigma is the combination of the main strategies of Six Sigma and Lean. This paper aims to reveal success factors of these three project management methodologies employing Fuzzy cognitive map (FCM) technique, which combines fuzzy logic and neural networks. Presence of cause-and-effect relationships between pair of success indicators and unavailability of crisp data led us to use FCM method in order to determine the most significant criteria of these project management methodologies. This is the first study that considers multiple and conflicting criteria of success factors of waterfall, agile, and lean six sigma project management methodologies. There is no study that aims to provide success criteria evaluation of waterfall, agile, and lean six sigma project management methodologies. This assessment is crucial for companies that have to be managed effectively their project processes in increasing technology and market competition. FCM is a suitable tool to solve this problem since it considers positive and negative relationships, causal links among criteria with their direction, and it is applicable in the absence of crisp data.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

DURSUN, M., GÖKER, N., MUTLU, H. (2022). Evaluation of Project Management Methodologies Success Factors Using Fuzzy Cognitive Map Method: Waterfall, Agile, And Lean Six Sigma Cases. International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1, 35–43. https://ajindex.com/articles/541257

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. H. Lei, F. Ganjeizadeh, P. K. Jayachandran, and P. A. Ozcan, “Statistical analysis of the effects of Scrum and Kanban on software development projects,” Robot. Comput. Integr. Manuf., vol. 43, pp. 59- 67, 2017
  2. R. D. Snee, “Lean six sigma–getting better all the time,” Int. J. Lean Six Sigma., vol. 1, pp. 9-29, 2010
  3. E. V. Gijo, and J. Antony, “Reducing patient waiting time in outpatient department using lean six sigma methodology,” Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int., vol. 30, no. 8, pp. 1481-1491, 2014
  4. A. Cockburn, “Selecting a project's methodology,” IEEE softw., vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 64-71, 2000
  5. A. Lova, and P. Tormos, “Anal ysis of scheduling schemes and heuristic rules performance in resource-constrained multiproject scheduling,” Ann. Oper. Res., vol. 102, no. 1-4, pp. 263-286, 2001
  6. D. M. Raffo, “Software project management using PROMPT: A hybrid metrics, modeling and utility framework,” Inf. Softw. Technol., vol. 47, no. 15, pp. 1009-1017, 2005
  7. L. A. Vidal, F. Marle, and J. C. Bocquet, “Using a Delphi process and the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to evaluate the complexity of projects,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 5388-5405, 2011
  8. J. Varajão, and M. M. Cruz-Cunha, “Using AHP and the IPMA competence baseline in the project managers selection process,” Int. J. Prod. Res., vol. 51, no. 11, pp. 3342-3354, 2013
  9. D. Petković, S. H. Ab Hamid, Z. Ćojbašić, and N. T. Pavlović, “Adapting project management method and ANFIS strategy for variables selection and analyzing wind turbine wake effect,” Nat. Hazards, vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 463-475, 2014
  10. U. Asan, A. Soyer, and E. Bozdag, “An interval type-2 fuzzy prioritization approach to project risk assessment,” J. Mult.-Valued Log. Soft Comput., vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 541-577, 2016
  11. R. Joslin, and R. Müller, “The impact of project methodologies on project success in different project environments,” Int. J. Manag. Proj., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 364-388, 2016
  12. M. García-Melón, and R. Poveda-Bautista, “Using the strategic relative alignment index for the selection of portfolio projects application to a public Venezuelan power corporation,” Int. J. Prod. Econ., vol. 170, pp. 54-66, 2015
  13. B. H. Tabrizi, S. A. Torabi, and S. F. A. Ghaderi, “A novel project portfolio selection framework: An application of fuzzy DEMATEL and multi-choice goal programming,” Sci. Iran., vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 2945- 2958, 2016
  14. M. K. Ghorabaee, M. Amiri, J. S. Sadaghiani, and E. K. Zavadskas,