Dergiler / International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics / 2021 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2

Comparative Analysis on Deep Learning based Pan-sharpening of Very High-Resolution Satellite Images

Sayfa
150–165
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

According to results, the deep learning-based methods provided promising results in both the reduced resolution and full resolution experiments, while PRACS method outperformed other traditional algorithms in most of the experimental configurations.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Pan-sharpening is a fundamental task of remote sensing, aiming to produce a synthetic image having high spatial and spectral resolution of original panchromatic and multispectral images.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In this research, a detailed comparative analysis was conducted to evaluate the performance and visual quality of pan-sharpening results from traditional algorithms and deep learning-based models.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:According to results, the deep learning-based methods provided promising results in both the reduced resolution and full resolution experiments, while PRACS method outperformed other traditional algorithms in most of the experimental configurations.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Pan-sharpening · Deep Learning · Convolutional Neural Network

Abstract

Pan-sharpening is a fundamental task of remote sensing, aiming to produce a synthetic image having high spatial and spectral resolution of original panchromatic and multispectral images. In recent years, as in other tasks of the remote sensing field, deep learning based approaches have been developed for this task. In this research, a detailed comparative analysis was conducted to evaluate the performance and visual quality of pan-sharpening results from traditional algorithms and deep learning-based models. For this purpose, the deep learning based methods that are CNN based pan-sharpening (PNN), Multiscale and multi-depth convolutional neural networks (MSDCNN) and Pan-sharpened Generative Adversarial Networks (PSGAN) and traditional methods that are Brovey, PCA, HIS, Indusion and PRACS were applied. Analysis were performed on regions with different land cover characteristics to evaluate the stability of the methods. In addition, effects of the filter size, spectral indices, activation and loss functions on the pan-sharpening were investigated. For the accuracy assessment, commonly used with-reference and without-reference quality metrics were computed in addition to visual quality evaluations. According to results, the deep learning-based methods provided promising results in both the reduced resolution and full resolution experiments, while PRACS method outperformed other traditional algorithms in most of the experimental configurations.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

SERTEL, E., WANG, P., ALGANCİ, U. (2022). Comparative Analysis on Deep Learning based Pan-sharpening of Very High-Resolution Satellite Images. International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2, 150–165. https://ajindex.com/articles/540945

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (11)

  1. Aiazzi, B., Alparone, L., Baronti, S., & Garzelli, a. (2002). Context-driven fusion of high spatial and spectral resolution images based on oversampled multiresolution analysis. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2002.803623
  2. Aiazzi, B., Alparone, L., Baronti, S., Garzelli, A., & Selva, M. (2003). An MTF-based spectral distortion minimizing model for pan-sharpening of very high resolution multispectral images of urban areas. 2nd GRSS/ISPRS Joint Workshop on Remote Sensing and Data Fusion over Urban Areas, URBAN 2003. https://doi.org/10.1109/DFUA.2003.1219964
  3. AIRBUS. (2020). Pleiades Products. https://www.intelligence-airbusds.com/optical-and-radar-data/#pleiades
  4. Chavez Jr., P. S., & Yaw Kwarteng, A. (1989). Extracting spectral contrast in Landsat Thematic Mapper image data using selective principal component analysis. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing. Cheng, M., Wang, C., & Li, J. (2014). Sparse representation based pansharpening using trained dictionary. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters. https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2013.2256875
  5. Choi, J., Yu, K., & Kim, Y. (2011). A new adaptive component-substitution-based satellite image fusion by using partial replacement. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2010.2051674
  6. Christian Ledig Ferenc Huszar, L. T. (2017). Photo-Realistic Single Image Super-Resolution Using a Generative Adversarial Network. 19. DigitalGlobe. (2020). Tools and Resources. http://www.digitalglobe.com/resources.
  7. Dong, C., Loy, C. C., He, K., & Tang, X. (2016). Image Super-Resolution Using Deep Convolutional Networks. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2015.2439281
  8. Gao, B. (1996). NDWI—A Normalized Difference Water Index for Remote Sensing of Vegetation Liquid Water From Space. Remote Sensing of Environment, 266(April), 257–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(96)00067-3
  9. Gillespie, A. R., Kahle, A. B., & Walker, R. E. (1987). Color enhancement of highly correlated images. II. Channel ratio and “chromaticity” transformation techniques. Remote Sensing of Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(87)90088-5
  10. Goodfellow, I. J., & Pouget-Abadie, J. (2014). Generative Adversarial Nets. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology, 155(4), 270–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetimm.2013.08.005
  11. He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2015). Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition.