Dergiler / International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences / 2018 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2

Comparison of regional and global TEC values: Turkey model

Sayfa
61–72
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

There is a positive and quite high correlation between the regional (RIM) TEC values produced by the calculated correlation coefficients and the global (CODE, ESA, JPL) TEC and IRI TEC values.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The ionosphere is a layer of atmosphere 60 km to 1100 km above the earth and is composed of solar rays and ionized gases.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In this study, 68 stations including 56 Continuously Operating Reference Stations-Turkey (CORS-TR) stations and also IGS stations were taken for evaluation.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:There is a positive and quite high correlation between the regional (RIM) TEC values produced by the calculated correlation coefficients and the global (CODE, ESA, JPL) TEC and IRI TEC values.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:2009 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:GNSS · Total Electron Content (TEC) · Ionosphere

Abstract

The ionosphere is a layer of atmosphere 60 km to 1100 km above the earth and is composed of solar rays and ionized gases. The ionosphere is an important layer affecting Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) measures. The quality of GNSS measures is directly related to the changes in the ionosphere. For this reason, monitoring changes in the ionosphere is quite important. One of the important parameters expressing the characteristic of the ionosphere is the Total Electron Content (TEC), which is a function of electron density exhibiting transformation with solar radiation. In this study, 68 stations including 56 Continuously Operating Reference Stations-Turkey (CORS-TR) stations and also IGS stations were taken for evaluation. Bernese v5.2 GNSS software developed by Bern University of Switzerland was employed at the evaluation stage. From 2009 until 2015, TEC values were calculated at two hourly intervals, one day for each month. In the study, where a Single Layer Model was used, TEC values obtained from GNSS measurements have been compared with the TEC (IRI-2012 TEC) values obtained from the global ionosphere map (GIM-TEC) and the international ionosphere reference model programme published by the Centre for Orbit Determination in Europe (CODE), the European Space Agency (ESA), and the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL). As a result, the regional (RIM) TEC values and the global (CODE, ESA, JPL) TEC values showed a large similarity, and the IRI obtained TEC values remained lower than these four values was observed. Correlation coefficient was calculated to determine the relationship between regional TEC values obtained after the evaluation and global TEC values. There is a positive and quite high correlation between the regional (RIM) TEC values produced by the calculated correlation coefficients and the global (CODE, ESA, JPL) TEC and IRI TEC values.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

BÜLBÜL, S., BAŞÇİFTÇİ, F., İNAL, C., YILDIRIM, Ö. (2022). Comparison of regional and global TEC values: Turkey model. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2, 61–72. https://ajindex.com/articles/540743

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Abdullah, M., Strangeways, H. J. and Walsh, D. M., 2009. Improving ambiguity resolution rate with an accurate ionospheric differential correction. Journal of Navigation, 62 (01), 151-166.
  2. Alcay, S., Yigit, C. O., Seemala, G., Ceylan, A., 2014. GPS-Based Ionosphere Modeling: A Brief Review, Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 23 (3a), 815-824.
  3. Arslan, N., 2004. Investigation of the effects of the ionospheric total electron content variations on the coordinates using GPS. Ph.D. Thesis, Yildiz Technical University, Istanbul. Basciftci, F., Inal, C., Yildirim, O., Bulbul, S., 2017a. Determination of Regional TEC Values by GNSS Measurements, A Case Study: Central Anatolia Sample, Turkey. Surveying the world of tomorrow – From digitalisation to augmented reality, FIG Working Week 2017. Helsinki/Finland. Basciftci F., Inal C., Yildirim O., Bulbul S., 2017b. Determining regional ionospheric model comparing with global models. Geodetski vestnik, 61 (3), 427-440. DOI: 10.15292/geodetski-vestnik.2017.03.427-440.
  4. Başpınar, S. 2012. Examine Ionoshphere Models with CORS-TR Datas. Ph.D. Thesis, Istanbul Kultur University, Istanbul. Bilitza, D., Altadil, D., Zhang, Y., Mertens, C., Truhlink, V., Richards, P., Mckinnell, L., Reinish, B. 2014. The International Reference Ionosphere 2012-a model of international collaboration. Journal of Space Weather and Space Climate, 4, A107, http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2014004.
  5. Calais, E., Minster, J. B., 1998.
  6. GPS, Earthquakes, The Ionosphere, and Space Shuttle. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors 105, 167–181. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9201(97)00089-7.
  7. Dach, R., Lutz, S., Walser, P., Fridez, P. 2015. Bernese GNSS Software Version 5.2. User manual, Astronomical Institute, Universtiy of Bern, Bern Open Publishing. DOI: 10.7892/boris.72297, ISBN: 978-3- 906813-05-9.
  8. Datta-Barua, S., 2008. Ionospheric Threats to The Integrity of Aırborne GPS Users. The Department Of Aeronautıcs And Astronautıcs, Phd Thesis s:17-28.
  9. Davies, K., Hartmann, G. 1997. Studying The Ionosphere With The Global Positioning System. Radio Science, 32 (4), 1695-1703. https://doi.org/10.1029/97rs00451
  10. Fedrizzi, M., Langley, R.B., Komjathy, A., Santos, M.C., Paulos, E.R., Kantor, I.J., 2001. The Low-Latitude Ionosphere: Monitoring Its Behaviour with GPS. IONGPS 2001,
  11. Salt Lake City, Utah, USA, Sept. 11-14 2001
  12. Gao, Y and Liu, Z. Z., 2002. Precise Ionosphere Modeling Using Regional GPSNetwork Data. Journal of Global Positioning Systems, Vol.1, No.1, 1