Dergiler / International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences / 2022 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1

Determining the buried concrete amount using GPR/GPS combination method

Sayfa
59–66
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

All types of buried layers such as C-25 road concrete, plaster or asphalt have been extracted from the entire data using the amplitude differences.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This paper investigates the possibility of describing location based NDT (Non-Destructive Testing) samples for an officially finalized project of a buried concrete layer beneath the İstanbul-Millet Street, by the combination of high frequency GPR and CORS-GPS.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:For this purpose, field works and laboratory studies were performed.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:All types of buried layers such as C-25 road concrete, plaster or asphalt have been extracted from the entire data using the amplitude differences.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Concrete · GPR · NDT

Abstract

This paper investigates the possibility of describing location based NDT (Non-Destructive Testing) samples for an officially finalized project of a buried concrete layer beneath the İstanbul-Millet Street, by the combination of high frequency GPR and CORS-GPS. For this purpose, field works and laboratory studies were performed. First, data acquisition was carried out over the asphalt surface along the construction route of the street. Reflected/scattered electromagnetic wave fields was studied over the processed radargram of the concrete layer. Hence, the upper and lower boundaries of buried concrete layer were determined as a value of depth and coordinate based on spatial dataset, where there was no information about the current amount of constructed concrete. According to the measurement results, the marked location of reflected/scattered wave field on the processed radargrams defined the newly constructed concrete layer. The vertical distance between upper and lower boundaries of the layer defines the thickness of concrete layer. All types of buried layers such as C-25 road concrete, plaster or asphalt have been extracted from the entire data using the amplitude differences.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

UÇAR, C., ŞANLI, F. B. (2022). Determining the buried concrete amount using GPR/GPS combination method. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1, 59–66. https://ajindex.com/articles/540655

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (11)

  1. Alp K, Gelişli K, Yılmaz A O, Kaya R & Çavuşoğlu (2003). Mermer İşletmeciliğinde Yer Radarı Uygulamaları, MRSEM, Türkiye IV. Mermer Semposyumu. Bildiriler Kitabı, 37-48.
  2. Annan A P (2000). Ground Penetrating radar workshop notes, Sensors and Software Inc., Canada. Aspiron U & Aigner T (1999). Towards realistic aquifer models: Three dimensional georadar surveys of Quaternary gravel deltas (Singen Basin, SW Germany), Sedimentary Geology, 129, 281-297.
  3. Billinger M S (2009). Utilizing ground penetrating radar for the location of a potential human burial under concrete, J of Forensic Sciences, 42(3), 200-209.
  4. Cardelli E, Maronne C & Orlando L (2003). Evaluation of tunnel stability using integrated geophysical methods, Journal of Applied Geophysics, 52, 93-102.
  5. Changryol K, Daniels J J, Guy E, Radzevicius S J & Holt J (2000). Residual hydrocarbons in a water-saturated medium: A detection strategy using ground penetrating radar, Environmental Geosciences, 7(4), 169-176.
  6. Conyers L B (2004). Ground Penetrating Radar for Archaeology-Altamira Press-ISBN 0-7591-0772, 23-55.
  7. Daniels J J (2000). Ground penetrating radar for imaging archeological objects in the subsurface, Proceedings of the New Millennium International Forum on Consideration of Cultural Property, Kongju, Korea, 247-265. Dannowski G & Yaramancı U (1999). Estimation of water content ant porosity using combined radar and geoelectric measurements, European Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, 4, 71-85.
  8. Davenport G C (2001). Remote sensing applications in forensic investigations, Historical Archaeology, 35(1), 87-100. Davis J L & Annan A P (1989). Ground Penetrating Radar for high resolution mapping of soil and rock stratigraphy,Geophysical Prospecting, 37, 531-551. Grandjean G & Gourry J C (1999). GPR data processing for 3D fracturemapping in a marble quarry (Thassos, Greece), Journal of Applied Geophysics, 36, 19-30.
  9. Green A, Gross R, Holliger K, Horstmeyer H & Baldwin J (2003). Results of 3-D georadar surveying and trenching the San Andreas Fault near its northern landward limit,Tectonophysics, 368, 7-23.
  10. Hammon W S, McMechan G A & Zeng X, Forensic (2000). GPR: finite-difference simulations of responses from buried human remains,Journal of Applied Geophysics, 45(3), 171-186.
  11. Harrari Z (1996). Ground penetrating radar (GPR) for imaging stratigraphic features and groundwater in sand dunes, Journal of Applied Geophysics, 36, 43-52. Kadıoğlu S & Daniels J J (2008). 3D visualization of integrate