Dergiler / IOJET / 2021 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2

DOES THE DIGITAL GENERATION COMPREHEND BETTER FROMTHE SCREEN OR FROM THE PAPER?: A META-ANALYSIS

Dergi
IOJET
Sayfa
1206–1224
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

It is recommended to perform studies on improving the screen interface and screen reading skills.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This research was carried out to determine whether the comprehension level differs according to the reading environment by examining the studies comparing the comprehension level according to reading from the screen and from the paper by using meta-analysis method.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The data of the study were obtained from 12 studies (29 comparisons).
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:It is recommended to perform studies on improving the screen interface and screen reading skills.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

This research was carried out to determine whether the comprehension level differs according to the reading environment by examining the studies comparing the comprehension level according to reading from the screen and from the paper by using meta-analysis method. Meta-analysis method was used in this research. The data of the study were obtained from 12 studies (29 comparisons). All of these studies are studies in which Turkish texts are used in reading. The analysis of the obtained data was carried out using the Comprehensive MetaAnalysis software. In the interpretation of the studies, random effects model was taken as basis. As a result of the analyses performed, a significant and medium effect size (g=-0.423, p=0.003) was found in favor of reading from the paper. Therefore, this result shows that comprehension achievement is higher in reading from the paper than reading from the screen. In addition, it was determined that the effect sizes did not differ significantly according to the publication year, grade level, text type and digital tool. It is recommended to perform studies on improving the screen interface and screen reading skills.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

NAYCİ, Ö., ÖZTOP, F. (2022). DOES THE DIGITAL GENERATION COMPREHEND BETTER FROMTHE SCREEN OR FROM THE PAPER?: A META-ANALYSIS. IOJET, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2, 1206–1224. https://ajindex.com/articles/540634

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (6)

  1. Aloqaili A. S. (2011). The relationship between reading comprehension and critical thinking: A theoritical study. Journal of King Saud University-Languange and Translation, 24, 35- 41. doi: doi:10.1016/j.jksult.2011.01.001 Aydemir, Z., Öztürk, E., & Horzum, M. B. (2013). Ekrandan okumanın 5. sınıf öğrencilerinin bilgilendirici ve öyküleyici metin türünde okuduğunu anlama düzeylerine etkisi [The Effect of Reading from Screen on The 5th Grade Elementary Students’ Level of Reading Comprehension on Informative and Narrative Type of Texts]. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 13(4), 2263-2276.
  2. Baron, N. S. (2015). Words onscreen: The fate of reading in a digital world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  3. Başaran, M. (2014). 4. sınıf seviyesinde ekrandan ve kâğıttan okumanın okuduğunu anlama, okuma hızı ve metne karşı geliştirilen tutum üzerindeki etkisi [Effect of reading on screen and paper on elementary school 4th grade students' reading comprehension reading speed and their attitudes]. Uşak Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 7(2), 248-268. Baştuğ M., & Keskin, H. K. (2012). Okuma becerilerinin okuma ortamı açısından karşılaştırılması: ekran mı kâğıt mı? [Comparison of reading skills in terms of the reading environment: screen vs. paper] Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 16 (3), 73-83.
  4. Batluralkız, Ç. (2018). Basılı ve dijital ortamlarda ortaokul öğrencilerinin okuduğunu anlama becerilerinin karşılaştırılması [Comparing the reading comprehension skills of primary school students ın print vs digital setting]. Unpublished master's thesis, Kütahya Dumlupınar Üniversitesi,
  5. Kütahya. Becker, B. J. (2005). Failsafe n or file-drawer number. In H. Rothstein, A. J. Sutton, and M. Borenstein (Ed.), Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustment (s. 111-125). Chichester: John Wiley and Sons Ltd Begg, C.B., & Mazumdar, M. (1994) Operating Characteristics of a Rank Correlation Test for Publication Bias. Biometrics, 50(4), 1088-1101.
  6. Borenstein, M. (2005). Software for publication bias. In H. Rothstein, A. J. Sutton, and M. Borenstein (Ed.), Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustment (s. 193–220). Chichester: John Wiley and Sons Ltd Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Calhoon, M.B. (2005). Effects of a peer-mediated phonological skill and reading comprehension program on reading skill acqu