Dergiler / Maden Tetkik ve Arama Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 148 - Sayı: 148

POSSIBLE INCISION TIME OF THE LARGE VALLEYS IN SOUTHERN MARMARA REGION, NW TURKEY

Sayfa
1–17
Yayın Tarihi
2014-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

High altitudinal difference between sourceand depositional areas caused acceleration of the erosion.1.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Surface water and sediments derived from the southern Marmara region (= SusurlukDrainage basin- SDH) transport to lakes Manyas and Ulubat first and then go to the Sea ofMarmara via the Kocasu River only.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The present drainage system of the SDH provides a goodopportunity to study erosion rate and subsequently occurrence times of large-scale valleys inthe region.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:High altitudinal difference between sourceand depositional areas caused acceleration of the erosion.1.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Marmara · morphology · large valleys

Abstract

Surface water and sediments derived from the southern Marmara region (= SusurlukDrainage basin- SDH) transport to lakes Manyas and Ulubat first and then go to the Sea ofMarmara via the Kocasu River only. The present drainage system of the SDH provides a goodopportunity to study erosion rate and subsequently occurrence times of large-scale valleys inthe region. To achieve it, depositional characteristics and ion contents of the ancientlacustrine sediment has been investigated and re-interpreted using cores taken from LakeUlubat. The boron content of these sediments increased upward suddenly at the 4 m level,most probably due to starting of erosion at Emet borate beds in the drainage basin. Takinginto consideration equilibrium between natural erosion and sedimentation, the incision ratein the Emet valley was found 1.4 cm.yr-1. From here one can calculate a time span of 75 kyfor the formation of the whole valley itself. However, it is known that working of the geologicalprocesses was not monotonous in the past; hence, this date is not absolute. Newertheless,formation of the large valleys of the southern Marmara region shouldn’t be older than 300kyrs. An important reason on rapid erosion was likely lowered base-level as the Marmara Seawas a closed lake during the last Glacial Period. High altitudinal difference between sourceand depositional areas caused acceleration of the erosion.1. Girifl

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KAZANCI, N., EMRE, Ö., ERTURAÇ, K., LEROY, S. A., ÖNCEL, S., İLERİ, Ö., TOPRAK, Ö. (2014). POSSIBLE INCISION TIME OF THE LARGE VALLEYS IN SOUTHERN MARMARA REGION, NW TURKEY. Maden Tetkik ve Arama Dergisi, Cilt: 148 - Sayı: 148, 1–17. https://ajindex.com/articles/54048

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Aksu, A.E., Hiscott, R.N., Yaşar, D. 1999. Oscillating Quaternary water levels of the Marmara Sea and vigorous outflows into the Aegean Sea from the Marmara Sea-Black Sea drainage corridor. Marine Geology 153, 275–302.
  2. Ambraseys, N. 2009. Earthquakes in the Mediterranean and Middle East; a Multidisciplinary Study of Seismicity up to 1900.
  3. Cambridge University Press, ISBN 978-0-521-87292-8.
  4. Ambraseys, N., Finkel, C. 1991. Long-term seismicity of Istanbul and the Marmara Sea region. Terra Nova 3, 527-539.
  5. Ardel, A. 1943. Marmara bölgesinin güneydoğu havzalarının morfolojik karakterleri. Türk Coğrafya Dergisi 2, 160-171.
  6. Baş, H. 1987. Tavşanlı - Domaniç (Kütahya) volkanitlerinin özellikleri ve batı Anadolu Senozoyik volkanizmasındaki önemi. Türkiye Jeoloji Bülteni 30, 67-80.
  7. Bingöl, E., Akyürek, B., Korkmazer, B. 1973. Biga Yarımadasının jeolojisi ve Karakaya Formasyonunun bazı özellikleri. Cumhuriyetin 50. Yılı Yerbilimleri Kongresi Tebliğleri Kitabı, s. 70- 76, Ankara.
  8. Chorley, R.J., Schumm, S.A., Sugden, D.E. 1984.
  9. Geomorphology. Methuen, London, 605 s. Clayton, K. M. 1998. The rate of denudation of some British lowland landscapes. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 22, 721-731.
  10. Çağatay, M.N., Görür, N., Algan, O., Eastoe, C., Tchapalyga, A., Ongan, D., Kuhn, T., Kuscu, I. 2000. Last glacial-Holocene palaeoceanography of the Sea of Marmara: timing of last connections with the Mediterranean and the Black Seas. Marine Geology 167, 191-206.
  11. Çelenli, A. 2000. Uluabat Gölü Çevre Jeokimyası. İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul, Doktora Tezi (unpublished). Dalkıran, N., Karacaoğlu, D., Dere, S., Şentürk, E., Torunoğlu, T. 2006. Factors affecting the current status of a eutrophic shallow lake (Lake Uluabat, Turkey): Relationships between water physical and chemical variables. Chemical Ecology 22, 279-298.
  12. Darkot, B., Tuncel, M. 1981. Marmara Bölgesi coğrafyası. İstanbul Üniversitesi Coğrafya Enstitüsü Yayını, No 118, İstanbul.
  13. Eastwood, W. J., Roberts, C. N., Lamb, H. F., Tibby, J.C. 1999. Holocene environmental change in southwest Turkey; a palaeoecological record of lake and catchment-related changes. Quaternary Science Reviews 18, 671-695. EIE, 1993. Türkiye Akarsularında Sediment Gözlemleri ve Sediment Taşınım Miktarları. EIEI Genel Müdürlüğü, Yayın no 87-44, Ankara. EIE, 1996. Türkiye Akarsularında Su Kalitesi Gözlemleri. EIEI Genel Müdürlüğü, Yayın no 96-4, Ankara. EIE, 2000. Türkiye Akarsularinda Suspanse Sediment Gözlemleri ve