Dergiler / International Journal of Automotive Engineering and Technologies / 2018 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3

Comparative Exergy Analysis of Fuel Additives Containing Oxygen and HC based in a Spark-Ignition (SI) engine

Sayfa
124–133
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The results also revealed that the gasoline blends containing a 10% methanol, ethanol, and solketal were an unfavorable choice from the second-law perspective, due to the reduction in the exergy.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The effects of fuel additives have been investigated based on the second law (exergy analysis) of thermodynamic in an SI engine.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Test results showed that when compared with gasoline operation, the peak cylinder pressure for M10, E10, and S10 was increased by 18.65%, 12.75% and 15.52%, respectively, and also shifted towards to TDC.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The results also revealed that the gasoline blends containing a 10% methanol, ethanol, and solketal were an unfavorable choice from the second-law perspective, due to the reduction in the exergy.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

The effects of fuel additives have been investigated based on the second law (exergy analysis) of thermodynamic in an SI engine. Exergy terms such as the total cylinder exergy, exergy transfers via heat transfer and work, fuel chemical exergy and irreversibility were computed for closed part of the engine cycle. Additionally, the exergy distributions, the brake power, brake specific fuel consumption (BSFC), first (energy) and second law (exergy) efficiencies were determined. The experimental data, especially the measured cylinder pressure data, were used to calculate the exergy terms with a home-made code. Test results showed that when compared with gasoline operation, the peak cylinder pressure for M10, E10, and S10 was increased by 18.65%, 12.75% and 15.52%, respectively, and also shifted towards to TDC. In addition, the energy and exergy efficiency decreased with the addition of methanol, ethanol, and solketal. The maximum reduction in the exergy efficiency occurred for the S10, and this reduction was determined as about an 8.42%. The results also revealed that the gasoline blends containing a 10% methanol, ethanol, and solketal were an unfavorable choice from the second-law perspective, due to the reduction in the exergy.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ÖZCAN, H., ÇAKMAK, A. (2022). Comparative Exergy Analysis of Fuel Additives Containing Oxygen and HC based in a Spark-Ignition (SI) engine. International Journal of Automotive Engineering and Technologies, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3, 124–133. https://ajindex.com/articles/540342

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (9)

  1. M. Abu-Zaid, O. Badran, and J. Yamin, "Effect of Methanol Addition on the Performance of Spark Ignition Engines," Energy & Fuels, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 312-315, 2004/03/01 2004. M. Al-Hasan, "Effect of ethanol– unleaded gasoline blends on engine performance and exhaust emission," Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 44, no. 9, pp. 1547-1561, 6// 2003.
  2. S. Babazadeh Shayan, S. M. Seyedpour, F. Ommi, S. H. Moosavy, and M. Alizadeh, "Impact of Methanol–Gasoline Fuel Blends on the Performance and Exhaust Emissions of a SI Engine," (in eng %@ 2008-9899 %[ 2011), International Journal of Automotive Engineering, Research vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 219227, 2011. A. Bilgin and İ. Sezer, "Effects of Methanol Addition to Gasoline on the Performance and Fuel Cost of a Spark Ignition Engine," Energy & Fuels, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 2782-2788, 2008/07/01 2008. R. C. Costa and J. R. Sodré, "Hydrous ethanol vs. gasoline-ethanol blend: Engine performance and emissions," Fuel, vol. 89, no. 2, pp. 287-293, 2// 2010.
  3. P. Danaiah, P. R. Kumar, and D. V. Kumar, "Effect of methanol gasoline blended fuels on the performance and emissions of SI engine," International Journal of Ambient Energy, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 175-180, 2013/12/01 2013.
  4. W.-D. Hsieh, R.-H. Chen, T.-L. Wu, and T.-H. Lin, "Engine performance and pollutant emission of an SI engine using ethanol–gasoline blended fuels," Atmospheric Environment, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 403-410, 1// 2002.
  5. M. Koç, Y. Sekmen, T. Topgül, and H. S. Yücesu, "The effects of ethanol–unleaded gasoline blends on engine performance and exhaust emissions in a spark-ignition engine," Renewable Energy, vol. 34, no. 10, pp. 21012106, 10// 2009.
  6. S. Liu, E. R. Cuty Clemente, T. Hu, and Y. Wei, "Study of spark ignition engine fueled with methanol/gasoline fuel blends," Applied Thermal Engineering, vol. 27, no. 11–12, pp. 1904-1910, 8// 2007.
  7. I. Schifter, L. Diaz, R. Rodriguez, J. P. Gómez, and U. Gonzalez, "Combustion and emissions behavior for ethanol–gasoline blends in a single cylinder engine," Fuel, vol. 90, no. 12, pp. 3586-3592, 12// 2011.
  8. C.-W. Wu, R.-H. Chen, J.-Y. Pu, and T.H. Lin, "The influence of air–fuel ratio on engine performance and pollutant emission of an SI engine using ethanol–gasoline-blended fuels," Atmospheric Environment, vol. 38, no. 40, pp. 7093-7100, 12// 2004.
  9. H. S. Yücesu, A. Sozen, T. Topgül, and E. Arcaklioğlu, "Comparative study of mathematical and experimental analysis of spark ignition engine performance used ethanol–gasoline blend fuel