Dergiler / International Journal of Automotive Engineering and Technologies / 2019 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3

Determination of effects of compression ratio variation on performance and emission characteristics of a diesel engine fueled with EDTA-doped sunflower biodiesel-petrodiesel

Sayfa
140–149
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Smoke opacity values were 16%, 12% and 10% forB100+EDTA; 21%, 18% and 16% for B100 under CRs of 16, 17 and 18,respectively.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This experimental study focuses on unraveling the effects of compression ratio(CR) variation on performance and emission characteristics of a variablecompression ratio (VCR) diesel engine under various loads.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The engine wasfueled with 100% sunflower biodiesel (B100) and B100 withEthylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA, C10H16N2O8) additive(B100+EDTA), separately, to determine fuel effect.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Smoke opacity values were 16%, 12% and 10% forB100+EDTA; 21%, 18% and 16% for B100 under CRs of 16, 17 and 18,respectively.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

This experimental study focuses on unraveling the effects of compression ratio(CR) variation on performance and emission characteristics of a variablecompression ratio (VCR) diesel engine under various loads. The engine wasfueled with 100% sunflower biodiesel (B100) and B100 withEthylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA, C10H16N2O8) additive(B100+EDTA), separately, to determine fuel effect. Subsequent todetermination of fuel properties, effects of these two fuels were comparedunder 3 different CRs. High hydrogen and oxygen contents, negligiblechemical inactivity and high cetane number (CN) made EDTA an attractiveadditive for B100 in the context of engine characteristics. It was observed that,B100+EDTA depicted higher average t values of 24.3%, 25.7% and 26.5%whereas they were 17.3%, 18.7% and 19.4% for B100 under CRs of 16, 17 and18, respectively. In terms of BSFC, average B100 values were 17.3, 16.1, 14.8(kJ/kWh) whereas 10.1, 9.2, 7.9 (kJ/kWh) for B100+EDTA under CRs of 16,17 and 18, respectively. Te values were 265ºC, 252ºC and 234ºC forB100+EDTA and 296ºC, 281ºC and 267ºC for B100 at CRs of 16, 17 and 18,respectively. CO values were 110, 103 and 96 (ppm) for B100; 82, 74 and 65(ppm) for B100+EDTA under under in-question CRs. UHC values of 124, 115and 98 (ppm) for B100+EDTA; 141, 134 and 119 (ppm) for B100 wereobtained under CRs of 16, 17 and 18, respectively. CO2 emission values were4.2%, 5.7% and 6.3% (by vol.) for B100+EDTA; 3.4%, 3.9% and 5.1% forB100 under CRs of 16, 17 and 18, respectively. NOx values were 170, 192 and210 (ppm) for B100+EDTA; 104, 126 and 137 (ppm) for B100 under CRs of16, 17 and 18 respectively. Smoke opacity values were 16%, 12% and 10% forB100+EDTA; 21%, 18% and 16% for B100 under CRs of 16, 17 and 18,respectively.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

YILMAZ, A. C. (2022). Determination of effects of compression ratio variation on performance and emission characteristics of a diesel engine fueled with EDTA-doped sunflower biodiesel-petrodiesel. International Journal of Automotive Engineering and Technologies, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3, 140–149. https://ajindex.com/articles/540316

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (15)

  1. Ali, Y., & Hanna, M.A. “Alternative diesel fuels from vegetable oils”, Bioresource Technology, 50(2), 153–63, 1994
  2. Balat, M., & Balat, H. “Progress in biodiesel processing”, Appl Energy, 87(6), 1815–1835, 2010
  3. Beck, A., Pölczmann, G., Eller, Z., & Hancsók, J. “Investigation of the effect of detergent–dispersant additives on the oxidation stability of biodiesel, diesel fuel and their blends”, Biomass and Bioenergy, 66, 328-336, 2014
  4. Bora, B.J., Saha, U.K., Chatterjee, S., & Veer, V. “Effect of compression ratio on performance, combustion and emission characteristics of a dual fuel diesel engine run on raw biogas”, Energy Convers. Manag., 87, 2014
  5. Bora, B.J., & Saha, U.K. “Experimental evaluation of a rice bran biodiesel biogas run dual fuel diesel engine at varying compression ratios”, Renewable Energy, 87(1), 782-790, 2015
  6. Bora, B.J., & Saha, U.K. “Comparative assessment of a biogas run dual fuel diesel engine with rice bran oil methyl ester, pongamia oil methyl ester and palm oil methyl ester as pilot fuels”, Renew. Energy, 81, 490-498, 2015
  7. Caynak, S., Guru, M., Bicer, A., Keskin, A., & Icingur, Y. “Biodiesel production from pomace oil and improvement of its properties with synthetic manganese additive”, Fuel, 88(3), 534–538, 2009
  8. Chen, H., Wang, J., Shuai, S., & Chen, W. “Study of oxygenated biomass fuel blends on a diesel engine”, Fuel, 87(15-16), 3462– 3468, 2008
  9. Danilov, A.M. “Development and use of fuel additives during 2006-2010”, Chemistry and Technology of Fuels and Oils, 47(6), 470- 484, 2012
  10. Demirbas, A. “Biomass resource facilities and biomass conversion processing for fuels and chemicals”, Energy Conversion Management, 42(11), 1357–1378, 2001
  11. Demirbas, A. “Importance of biodiesel as transportation fuel”, Energy Policy, 35(9). 4661–4670, 2007
  12. Franco, Z., & Nguyen, Q.D. “Flow properties of vegetable oil–diesel fuel blends”, Fuel, 90(2), 838–843, 2011
  13. Gerhartz, W., Yamamoto, Y.S., Kaudy, L., Rounsaville, J.F., & Schulz G. “Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry, 5th ed., Weinheim, Germany, 2000
  14. Goodrum, J.W., & Law, S.E. “Rheological properties of peanut oil–diesel fuel blends”, Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, 25(4),897–900, 1982
  15. Hirkude, J., & Padalkar, A.S. “Experimental investigation of the effect of compression ratio on performance and emissions of CI engine operated with waste fried methyl ester blend”, Fuel Process. Techn