Dergiler / International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education / 2018 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 4

Facebook as a Peer-Assessment Platform: A Case Study in Art Teacher Education Context

Sayfa
740–753
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The participants also emphasized some disadvantages of the practice of peer assessment on Facebook such as subjective feedback and poor quality of digitalized visuals.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This research intended to answer the question “Is Peer-Assessment on Facebook useful in visual art education?” in an intrinsic case study.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Ten volunteering prospective visual-art teachers were involved in the study during 2013-2014 academic year.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The participants also emphasized some disadvantages of the practice of peer assessment on Facebook such as subjective feedback and poor quality of digitalized visuals.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2013-2014 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Facebook · Peer assessment · Interactive learning environments

Özet

This research intended to answer the question “Is Peer-Assessment on Facebook useful in visual art education?” in an intrinsic case study. Participants were a group of prospective visual-art teachers, who regularly share and comment on the photographs of their paintings in a special group they created on Facebook. Ten volunteering prospective visual-art teachers were involved in the study during 2013-2014 academic year. Focus group interviews were conducted with the participants to collect data in addition to online digital documents, including photographs of students’ paintings and comments on them. In general, participants stated that Facebook-based peer assessment is beneficial, since it helps them notice their deficiencies, look at their works from a different perspective and improve their artistic skills. Thanks to the productive feedback, their motivation and self-confidence are boosted. It was also found that peer-assessment on Facebook has the advantage of ubiquity, allowing more peer involvement, easy and objective criticism, and sustainable learning opportunities in the long-run. The participants also emphasized some disadvantages of the practice of peer assessment on Facebook such as subjective feedback and poor quality of digitalized visuals.

Abstract

This research intended to answer the question “Is Peer-Assessment on Facebook useful in visual art education?” in an intrinsic case study. Participants were a group of prospective visual-art teachers, who regularly share and comment on the photographs of their paintings in a special group they created on Facebook. Ten volunteering prospective visual-art teachers were involved in the study during 2013-2014 academic year. Focus group interviews were conducted with the participants to collect data in addition to online digital documents, including photographs of students’ paintings and comments on them. In general, participants stated that Facebook-based peer assessment is beneficial, since it helps them notice their deficiencies, look at their works from a different perspective and improve their artistic skills. Thanks to the productive feedback, their motivation and self-confidence are boosted. It was also found that peer-assessment on Facebook has the advantage of ubiquity, allowing more peer involvement, easy and objective criticism, and sustainable learning opportunities in the long-run. The participants also emphasized some disadvantages of the practice of peer assessment on Facebook such as subjective feedback and poor quality of digitalized visuals.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ŞAD, S. N., ERSÖZ, Y. (2022). Facebook as a Peer-Assessment Platform: A Case Study in Art Teacher Education Context. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 4, 740–753. https://ajindex.com/articles/540240

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (11)

  1. Bay, E. (2011). The Opinions of Prospective Teachers about Peer Assessment. Gaziantep Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 5(2), 909 -925. Chang, C., Tseng, K., Chou, P., & Chen, Y. (2011). Reliability and validity of Web-based portfolio peer assessment: A case study for a senior high school’s students taking computer course. Computers & Education, 57, 1306–1316.
  2. Cooke, S. (2017). Social teaching: Student perspectives on the inclusion of social media in higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 22(1), 255-269.
  3. Creswell, J.W.(2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage. Creswell, J.W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative (4th edition). Baston: Pearson Education, Inc. Hocevar, K.P. (2013). What is social about social media users? How social media efficacy impacts information evaluation online. (Unpublished master thesis) University of California, Santa Barbara. Hummel, K.A., & Hlavacs, H. (2003). Anytime, anywhere learning behavior using a web-based platform for a university lecture. In Proceedings of the SSGRR 2003
  4. Winter Conference, L’Aquila, Italy. Koc, C. (2011). The Views of Prospective Class Teachers about Peer Assessment in Teaching Practice, Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 11(4), 1979-1989.
  5. Lau, W. W. (2017). Effects of social media usage and social media multitasking on the academic performance of university students. Computers in Human Behavior, 68, 286-291.
  6. Liang, J., & Tsai C. (2010). Learning through science writing via online peer assessment in a college biology course. Internet and Higher Education, 13, 242–247.
  7. Lin, K.C., Yang, S.H., Hung, J. C., & Wang, D.M. (2006). Web-based appreciation and peer-assessment for visual-art education. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies, 4(4), 5-14.
  8. Lin, S., Liu, E., & Yuan, S.M. (2001). Web-based peer assessment: feedback for students with various thinking-styles. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 17, 420-432.
  9. Liu, E., & Lee, C. (2013). Using peer feedback to improve learning via online peer assessment. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 12(1), 187-199.
  10. Loureiro, M.J., Pombo, L. & Moreira, A. (2012). The quality of peer assessment in a wiki-based online context: a qualitative study. Educational Media International, 49(2), 139-149.
  11. Lu, J., & Law, N. (2012). Online peer assessment: effects of cognitive and affective feedback. Instr Sci, 40, 257–275. L