KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education / 2018 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1

Development of Pamukkale Piano Learning Style Scale

Serhat SÜRAL
Serkan DEMİRTAŞ
Sayfa
89–104
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The original scale consists of four sub-dimensions, namely, independent, analytical, dependent and affective learning styles.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:In musical instrument training, piano has been taught as a compulsory instrument in all departments of Music Education.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The population of the study consisted of 170 music teacher candidates majoring in Music Education, including those who already took piano lessons.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The original scale consists of four sub-dimensions, namely, independent, analytical, dependent and affective learning styles.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Learning · Learning styles · Individual Differences

Abstract

In musical instrument training, piano has been taught as a compulsory instrument in all departments of Music Education. It is thought that as a major instrument, piano plays a crucial role in music education. Without question, it is highly vital to raise individuals' awareness of learning styles towards learning piano in effort to practice piano courses more efficiently and effectively. In this respect, the present study is of utmost importance as it will be a pioneer study and make a great deal of contributions to the relevant field. The current study was designed to develop a valid and reliable scale. The population of the study consisted of 170 music teacher candidates majoring in Music Education, including those who already took piano lessons. Although the study successfully accessed to the whole sample, only 133 scales were included to the research, due to inaccurate or incomplete data in subjects’ responses. To test the construct validity of the scale, explanatory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were used. The original scale consists of four sub-dimensions, namely, independent, analytical, dependent and affective learning styles.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

SÜRAL, S., DEMİRTAŞ, S. (2022). Development of Pamukkale Piano Learning Style Scale. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1, 89–104. https://ajindex.com/articles/540222

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (16)

  1. Altun, F., Yurga, C., Zahal, O., & Gürpınar, E. (2015). Music teacher candidates’ learning styles and the relationship between field achievement points. E-International Journal of Educational Research, 6(3), 46-70.
  2. Arslan, B. ve Babadoğan, C. (2005). Relationships between learning style preferences and gender, age and success level at 7th and 8th Grade. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 21(11), 35-48.
  3. Aşkar, P., & Akkoyunlu, B. (1993). Kolb learning style invorenment. Education and Science, 87, 37-47.
  4. Aydoğdu, M., ve Kesercioğlu, T. (2005). İlköğretimde fen ve teknoloji öğretimi. İstanbul:
  5. Anı Yayıncılık. Babacan, E. (2010). The Application of Perceptual Learning Styles in Beginning Piano Education. Unpublished Doctorate Thesis. Konya: Selçuk University The Institute of Education Sciences. Balcı, A. (1995). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntem, teknik ve ilkeler. Ankara:
  6. Pegem Yayıncılık. Baş, G. & Beyhan, Ö. (2013). Effects of learning styles based instruction on academic achievement, retention level and attitudes towards English course. Ankara University, Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences, 46(2), 133-158.
  7. Bütüner, Ö.S., & Gür, H. (2007). Development of an attitude scale for the V diagram. Journal of National Education, 176, Spring, 72–85.
  8. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2006). Sosyal Bilimler İçin Veri Analizi El Kitabı. Ankara:
  9. Pegem A Yayıncılık. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2015). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. Ankara:
  10. Pegem Akademi. Bozkurt, O., & Aydoğdu, M. (2009). A comparative analysis of the effect of Dunn and Dunn learning styles model and traditional teaching method on 6th grade students’ achievement levels and attitudes in science education lesson. İlköğretim Online, 8(3), 741-754.
  11. Can, A. (2014). SPSS ile bilimsel araştırma sürecinde nicel veri analizi. Ankara:
  12. Pegem Akademi. Demirtaş, S. (2017). The relationship between learning the styles of pre-service music teachers and academic achievement. Unpublished Doctorate Thesis. Uludağ University, The Institute of Social Sciences. Deniz, J. (2011). Learning Styles of Music teacher candidates. 2. International Conference of New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 950-956
  13. Duman, B. (2008). Comparison of learning strategies and learning styles that students use with their educational philosophy. Journal of the cukurova university institute of social sciences, 17(1), 203-224.
  14. Erden, M., Akman, Y. (2002). Gelişim ve Öğrenme. Arkadaş Yayınevi.
  15. Ankara.
  16. Gencel, İ.E. (2007). Kolb's learning