Dergiler / International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education / 2018 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1

Middle School Mathematics Teachers' Opinions on Feedback

Sayfa
32–49
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Based on the findings some suggestions about the usage of feedback were provided

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:During instruction, providing feedbacks improves students’ academic achievements as well as motivates them to actively engage in lesson activities.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Twelve mathematics teachers working in 12 different schools in a central district of Kırşehir voluntarily participated in the study during the 2015-2016 academic year.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Based on the findings some suggestions about the usage of feedback were provided
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:2015-2016 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

During instruction, providing feedbacks improves students’ academic achievements as well as motivates them to actively engage in lesson activities. Feedback is very important for teaching. Feedback is not only a functional tool to provide active involvement of the students to the learning process but also affects the academic success of the student. In this study, it is important to analyze in-service mathematics teachers' opinions on feedback. This study is conceptualized as a qualitative study. The data of this study included in-service teachers’ responses to a semi-structured questionnaire, which created by the researchers. In-service teachers’ responses to the interview questions were audio taped and later transcribed verbatim to conduct a content analysis. Twelve mathematics teachers working in 12 different schools in a central district of Kırşehir voluntarily participated in the study during the 2015-2016 academic year. The data of the study were obtained conducting face-to-face interviews with the mathematics teachers. Teachers’ responses to the questionnaire items were analyzed thematically and classified under the following seven headings: style of the feedback, scope of the feedback, principles of providing the feedback, difficulties experienced when providing the feedback, reasons for providing insufficient feedback, the benefits of the feedback, and the significance of the feedback in learning. The results are presented in relation to the literature in the area.Teachers agree that it is not possible to complete students’ gaps in Mathematics with the courses offered in the collective education system. Based on the findings some suggestions about the usage of feedback were provided

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

BEYDOĞAN, H. Ö. (2022). Middle School Mathematics Teachers' Opinions on Feedback. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1, 32–49. https://ajindex.com/articles/540215

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (17)

  1. Akyol, H. (2007).
  2. Vygotsky, Piaget ve Yapılandırmacı Okuma Eğitimi. VI. Ulusal Sınıf Öğretmenliği Kongresi Bildiri Kitabı, Eskişehir. Black, P. & William, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment Education, 5 (1), pp.7-74.
  3. Brookhart, S.M. (2011). Educational assessment knowledge and skills for teachers. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 3(1), pp. 3-12.
  4. Clark, K., & Dwyer, F. M. (1998). Effect of different types of computer-assisted feedbacks strategies on achievement and response confidence. International Journal of Instructional Media, 25(1), pp.55-63.
  5. Carvalhoa, C., Santosa J., Conboya, J. & Martinsa D. (2014). Teachers´ feedback: Exploring differences in students´ perceptions. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 159, pp. 169-173.
  6. Crooks, T.J. (1988). The impact of classroom evaluation on students. Review of Educational Research, 5, pp.438-481.
  7. Dempsey J.V., Litchfield B.C., & Driscoll M.P., (1993).
  8. Feedback, Retention, Discrimination Error, and Feedback Study Time, Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 25: 3, pp. 303-326.
  9. Duhon, G., House, S., Hastings, K., Poncy, B., & Solomon, B. (2015). Adding immediate feedback to explicit timing: An option for enhancing treatment ıntensity to ımprove mathematics fluency. Journal of Behavioral Education, 24(1), pp. 74-87.
  10. Eraz, G., & Öksüz, C. (2015). Sınıf öğretmenlerinin öğrencilerin ders dışı matematik etkinliklerine ilişkin uyguladıkları geribildirimlerin etkisi. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 36, ss.105-119.
  11. Erişen, Y. (1997). Öğretim elemanlarının dönüt ve düzeltme davranışlarını yerine getirme dereceleri. Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Yönetimi Dergisi, 3(1), ss. 45-62.
  12. Foote, C.J. (1999). Attribution feedback in the elementary classroom. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 13(2), 155-166.
  13. Hattie, J. & Timperley, H. (2007).
  14. The power of feedback, Review of Educational Research, 77 (1), pp. 81-112.
  15. Kluger, A.N. & Denisi, A. (1996). The Effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 2(2), pp. 254-284.
  16. Köğce, D. & Baki, A. (2012). İlköğretim matematik öğretmenlerinin geribildirim kavramına ilişkin inanışları, X. Ulusal Fen Bilimleri ve Matematik Eğitimi Kongresi, 27-30
  17. Haziran, Niğde. Labuhn, A.S., Zimmerman, B.J., & Hasselhorn, M. (2010). Enhancing students’ self-regulation and mathematics performance: The influence of feedback