Dergiler / International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education / 2019 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1

Performance Evaluation Using the Discrete Choquet Integral: Higher Education Sector

Sayfa
138–153
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Our results indicate that the entropy-based Choquet integral outperforms the complexity-based Choquet and k-means method in most of the cases.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Performance evaluation functions as an essential tool for decision makers in the field of measuring and assessing the performance under the multiple evaluation criteria aspect of the systems such as management, economy, and education system.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Besides, academic performance evaluation is one of the critical issues in higher institution of learning.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Our results indicate that the entropy-based Choquet integral outperforms the complexity-based Choquet and k-means method in most of the cases.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Performance evaluation · Fuzzy measure · Discrete Choquet integral

Özet

Performance evaluation functions as an essential tool for decision makers in the field of measuring and assessing the performance under the multiple evaluation criteria aspect of the systems such as management, economy, and education system. Besides, academic performance evaluation is one of the critical issues in higher institution of learning. Even though the academic evaluation criteria are inherently dependent, most of the traditional evaluation methods take no account of the dependency. Currently, the discrete Choquet integral can be proposed as a useful and effective aggregation operator due to being capable of considering the interactions among the evaluation criteria. In this paper, it is aimed to solve an academic performance evaluation problem of students in a university in Turkey using the discrete Choquet integral with the complexity-based method and the entropy-based method. Moreover, the k-means method, which has been widely used for evaluating students’ performance over 50 years, is used to compare the effectiveness and the success of two different frameworks based on discrete Choquet integral in the robustness check. Our results indicate that the entropy-based Choquet integral outperforms the complexity-based Choquet and k-means method in most of the cases.

Abstract

Performance evaluation functions as an essential tool for decision makers in the field of measuring and assessing the performance under the multiple evaluation criteria aspect of the systems such as management, economy, and education system. Besides, academic performance evaluation is one of the critical issues in higher institution of learning. Even though the academic evaluation criteria are inherently dependent, most of the traditional evaluation methods take no account of the dependency. Currently, the discrete Choquet integral can be proposed as a useful and effective aggregation operator due to being capable of considering the interactions among the evaluation criteria. In this paper, it is aimed to solve an academic performance evaluation problem of students in a university in Turkey using the discrete Choquet integral with the complexity-based method and the entropy-based method. Moreover, the k-means method, which has been widely used for evaluating students’ performance over 50 years, is used to compare the effectiveness and the success of two different frameworks based on discrete Choquet integral in the robustness check. Our results indicate that the entropy-based Choquet integral outperforms the complexity-based Choquet and k-means method in most of the cases.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

SÜLKÜ, S. N., KOÇAK, D. (2022). Performance Evaluation Using the Discrete Choquet Integral: Higher Education Sector. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1, 138–153. https://ajindex.com/articles/540190

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (7)

  1. Angilella, S., Arcidiacono, S.G., Corrente, S,, Greco, S., & Matarazzo, B. (2017). An application of the SMAA–Choquet method to evaluate the performance of sailboats in offshore regattas. Operational Research, doi:10.1007/s12351-017-0340-7.
  2. Angilella, S., Corrente, S., & Greco, S. (2015). Stochastic multiobjective acceptability analysis for the Choquet integral preference model and the scale construction problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 240(1), 172-182, doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2014.06.031. Baker, R.S.J.D., & Yacef, K. (2009). The state of educational data mining in 2009: A review and future visions. Journal of Educational Data Mining, 1(1), 3-17.
  3. Branke, J., Corrente, S., Greco, S., Słowiński, R., & Zielniewicz, P. (2016). Using Choquet integral as preference model in interactive evolutionary multiobjective optimization. European Journal of Operational Research, 250(3), 884-901, doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2015.10.027. Calvo, T., Mayor, G., & Mesiar, R. (2002). Aggregation operators: New trends and applications. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg, New York. Catlett, J. (1991). On changing continuous attributes into ordered discrete attributes. Kodratoff, Y. (Eds) Machine Learning Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. Chang, H.J., Liu, H.C., Tseng, S.W., & Chang, F.M. (2009). A comparison on Choquet integral with different information-based fuzzy measures. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics (pp. 3161-3166).
  4. Chmielewski, M.R., & Grzymala-Busse, J.W. (1996). Global discretization of continuous attributes as preprocessing for machine learning. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 15(4), 319-331. doi: 10.1016/S0888-613X(96)00074-6.
  5. Choquet, G. (1954). Theory of capacities. Annals of Institute of Fourier, 5, 131–295.
  6. Cui, L., & Li, Y. (2008). Linguistic quantifiers based on Choquet integrals. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 48(2), 559-582. doi: 10.1016/j.ijar.2007.11.001. Dougherty, J., Kohavi, R., & Sahami, M. (1995). Supervised and unsupervised discretization of continuous features. In 12th International Conference on Machine Learning. Los Altos, CA: Morgan Kaufmann, (pp. 194-202).
  7. Flynt, A., & Dean, N. (2016) A survey of popular R packages for cluster analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 41(2), 205-225. doi: 10.3102/1076998616631743. Garcia, S., Luengo, J., Saez, A., Lopez, V., & Herrera, F. (2013). A survey of discretization techniqu