KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / IOJET / 2020 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 4

AN ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECT OF PEER AND TEACHER FEEDBACK ON EFL LEARNERS’ ORAL PERFORMANCES AND SPEAKING SELF-EFFICACY LEVELS

Hong Yu Connie Au
Mehmet BARDAKÇI
Dergi
IOJET
Sayfa
1453–1468
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

This maysuggest that the sample size was insufficient to observe such a relationship.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This quasi-experimental study aims to determine EFL learners’ speaking self-efficacylevels and to examine the changes in oral performances after receiving feedback in threemodule courses.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The relationship between speaking self-efficacy and oral performances afterreceiving feedback was also studied.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:This maysuggest that the sample size was insufficient to observe such a relationship.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

This quasi-experimental study aims to determine EFL learners’ speaking self-efficacylevels and to examine the changes in oral performances after receiving feedback in threemodule courses. The relationship between speaking self-efficacy and oral performances afterreceiving feedback was also studied. Quantitative method was applied in this study. Thestudy was conducted among thirty-three EFL prep-school participants in a state university inTurkey. The research began with the implementation of a speaking self-efficacy scale (pretest) and a speaking test. This process was followed by three oral treatments followingteacher and peer feedback and the same speaking test. Repeated treatments and the samespeaking test were conducted in the other two modules, as well as a final speaking selfefficacy scale (post-test). The results of the speaking self-efficacy scale revealed that studentsgenerally possess high speaking self-efficacy level. The findings also showed that studentsdemonstrated significant changes in their oral performances following feedback treatment inboth groups. In the final speaking test, participants who received teacher and peer feedbackimproved by 212.36% and 161.20% respectively compared to the first speaking test.However, no significant correlation between the two variables was observed. This maysuggest that the sample size was insufficient to observe such a relationship.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Au, H. Y. C., BARDAKÇI, M. (2022). AN ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECT OF PEER AND TEACHER FEEDBACK ON EFL LEARNERS’ ORAL PERFORMANCES AND SPEAKING SELF-EFFICACY LEVELS. IOJET, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 4, 1453–1468. https://ajindex.com/articles/540184

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (11)

  1. Alawiyah, T. (2018). Speaking self-efficacy and EFL student teachers’ speaking achievement. Journal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran, 5(1), 87-96.
  2. Asakereh, A., & Dehghannezhad, M. (2015). Student satisfaction with EFL speaking classes: relating speaking self-efficacy and skills achievement. Issues in Educational Research, 25(4), 345-363.
  3. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioural change. Psychological Review. 84(2), 191-215.
  4. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York. Freeman. Bailey, K. M., & Savage, L. (1994). New ways in teaching speaking. Alexandria, VA. Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages. Cinkara, E., & Tılfarlıoğlu, F. Y. (2009). Self-efficacy in EFL: Differences among proficiency groups and relationships with success. Novitas-ROYAL, 3(2), 129-142.
  5. Dasmo, D., & Sundari, H. (2014). The effect of speaking self-efficacy and gender in speaking activities. Bahasa & Sastra, 14(2), 205-217.
  6. Gürsoy, E., & Karaca, N. (2018). The effect of speaking anxiety on speaking self-efficacy of children in EFF context. International Journal of Language Academy, 6(3), 194-210.
  7. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research. 77(1), 81-112.
  8. Konold, K. E., Millers, S. P., & Konold, K. B. (2004). Using teacher feedback to enhance student learning. Teaching Exceptional Children. 36(6), 64-69.
  9. Leeming, P. (2017). A longitudinal investigation into English speaking self-efficacy in a Japanese language classroom. Asia-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 2(12), 7-35.
  10. Liu, M. X. (2013). English bar as a venue to boost students’ speaking self-efficacy at the tertiary level. English Language and Teaching, 6(12), 27-37
  11. Lynch, T., & Maclean, J. (2003). Effects of feedback on performance: A study of advanced learners on an ESP speaking course. Edinburgh Working Papers In Applied Linguistics, 12. Marzano, R. J., Pickering, D. J., & Pollock, J. E. (2001). Classroom instruction that works: research-based strategies for increasing student achievement. ASCD, 187. Mills, N. (2014). Self-efficacy in second language acquisition. In S. Mercer & M. Williams (Eds.), Multiple perspectives on the self in SLA (p.6-19). Bristol: Multilingual Matters. Murillo-Zamorano, L.R. & Montanero, M. (2017). Oral presentations in Higher Education: a compariso