KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education / 2019 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 4

Classroom Response Systems as a Formative Assessment Tool: Investigation into Students’ Perceived Usefulness and Behavioural Intention

Muhittin ŞAHİN
Sayfa
693–705
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Based on these results, it can be said that students prefer to use technology-supported classroom response systems instead of the paper-based test.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Assessments are conducted to determine the effectiveness of learning.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:One type of these assessments are formative assessment, which aims to fill the gap between the learner's present situation and the desired situation by giving feedback to learners.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Based on these results, it can be said that students prefer to use technology-supported classroom response systems instead of the paper-based test.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Formative assessment · Classroom response systems · Perceived usefulness

Özet

Assessments are conducted to determine the effectiveness of learning. One type of these assessments are formative assessment, which aims to fill the gap between the learner's present situation and the desired situation by giving feedback to learners. For this purpose, Classroom Response Systems can be used in large groups. Paper-based tests, Kahoot, Quizizz, and, Plickers were used for formative assessment. Multiple-choice tests can be created for students with these applications. Students can connect to Kahoot and Quizizz applications via any computer, tablet or mobile phones with an internet connection and answer the questions in the test. For the Plickers application, the questions are displayed by the instructor in an area that all students can see. Students indicate their responses by lifting their paper which has QR code. The instructor scans these QR codes with the help of a mobile device and the students' answers are seen directly. In this context, the perceived usefulness and behavioral intention of the students to use different classroom response systems were investigated. The research was conducted with freshman students at a state university and continued for four weeks. Different applications were presented to the students as like that a paper-based test, Kahoot, Quizizz, and Plickers. When the findings were examined, it was found that students noted Kahoot, Quizizz, and Plickers applications were statistically more useful than the paper-based test. Based on these results, it can be said that students prefer to use technology-supported classroom response systems instead of the paper-based test.

Abstract

Assessments are conducted to determine the effectiveness of learning. One type of these assessments are formative assessment, which aims to fill the gap between the learner's present situation and the desired situation by giving feedback to learners. For this purpose, Classroom Response Systems can be used in large groups. Paper-based tests, Kahoot, Quizizz, and, Plickers were used for formative assessment. Multiple-choice tests can be created for students with these applications. Students can connect to Kahoot and Quizizz applications via any computer, tablet or mobile phones with an internet connection and answer the questions in the test. For the Plickers application, the questions are displayed by the instructor in an area that all students can see. Students indicate their responses by lifting their paper which has QR code. The instructor scans these QR codes with the help of a mobile device and the students' answers are seen directly. In this context, the perceived usefulness and behavioral intention of the students to use different classroom response systems were investigated. The research was conducted with freshman students at a state university and continued for four weeks. Different applications were presented to the students as like that a paper-based test, Kahoot, Quizizz, and Plickers. When the findings were examined, it was found that students noted Kahoot, Quizizz, and Plickers applications were statistically more useful than the paper-based test. Based on these results, it can be said that students prefer to use technology-supported classroom response systems instead of the paper-based test.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ŞAHİN, M. (2022). Classroom Response Systems as a Formative Assessment Tool: Investigation into Students’ Perceived Usefulness and Behavioural Intention. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 4, 693–705. https://ajindex.com/articles/540151

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (11)

  1. Andy, F. (2005). Discovering statistics using SPSS. Sage Publication Ltd. Bartsch, R. A., & Murphy, W. (2011). Examining the effects of an electronic classroom response system on student engagement and performance. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 44(1), 25-33.
  2. Bayrak, F., & Yurdugül, H. (2016). Web-tabanlı öz-değerlendirme sisteminde öğrenenlerin öz-müdahale algisi ve test alma davranişlarinin başari üzerine etkisi [The effect of self-intervention perception and test taking behaviour on success in web-based self-assessment system]. Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi, 7(1), 221-236.
  3. Bayrak, F., & Yurdugül, H. (2016). Web-tabanlı öz-değerlendirme sisteminde öğrenci uyarı indeksini temel alan öğrenme analitiği modülünün tasarlanması [Designing at the micro level learning analytics module for web-based self-assessment system]. Eğitim Teknolojisi Kuram ve Uygulama, 6(2), 85-99.
  4. Beatty, I. D., Gerace, W. J., Leonard, W. J., & Dufresne, R. J. (2006). Designing effective questions for classroom response system teaching. American Journal of Physics, 74(1), 31-39.
  5. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7-74.
  6. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). “How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School”, Expanded Edition,
  7. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  8. Deal, A. (2007). A teaching with technology white paper: classroom response systems. Office of Technology for Education. Eberly Center for Teaching Excellence. Retrieved June, 25, 2009.
  9. Feldman, A., & Capobianco, B. (2003). Real-time formative assessment: A study of teachers’ use of an electronic response system to facilitate serious discussion about physics concepts. In Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (Chicago, IL, 2003).
  10. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: an introduction to theory and research: Addison-Wesley, Reading MA. Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2011). How to design and evaluate research in education. New York: McGraw-Hill Humanities/Social Sciences/Languages. Fuller, J. S., & Dawson, K. M. (2017). Student response systems for formative assessment: Literature-based strategies and findings from a middle school implementation. Contemporary Educational Technology, 8(4), 370-389.
  11. Judson, E., & Sawada, D. (2002). Learning from past and present: Electronic response systems in college