KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education / 2020 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3

Validity and Reliability of The Cancer Loneliness and The Cancer-Related Negative Social Expectations Scale

İlgün ÖZEN ÇINAR
Ebru KARA
Sayfa
392–403
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

These scales are highly valid and reliable instruments for the Turkish society.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:There is a need for cancer-specific tools to evaluate loneliness and cancer-related negative social expectations before developing interventions for cancer patients.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Data were collected from 300 cancer patients registered to an oncology outpatient clinic of a University Hospital for this methodological study.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:These scales are highly valid and reliable instruments for the Turkish society.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Cancer · Loneliness · Negative Social Expectation

Özet

There is a need for cancer-specific tools to evaluate loneliness and cancer-related negative social expectations before developing interventions for cancer patients. The purpose of this study was to examine the reliability and validity of the Cancer Loneliness and the Cancer-related Negative Social Expectations Scale. Data were collected from 300 cancer patients registered to an oncology outpatient clinic of a University Hospital for this methodological study. In the data collection, Patient Information Form, Cancer Loneliness Scale and Cancer-related Negative Social Expectations Scale and the General Loneliness Scale were used. The Cronbach’s Alpha coefficient of the Cancer Loneliness Scale was found to be .88, Spearman-Brown correlation value was found to be .81, CFI, .98, GFI, .96, 𝑋2/SD, 2.99 and RMSEA .08. As for the Negative Social Expectations Scale, Cronbach alpha value was found as .82, Spearman-Brown correlation value .86, CFI 1.00, GFI 1.00, 𝑋2/SD 1.33 and RMSEA .02. The study revealed those both scales were highly reliable and indices of fit showed perfect fit. These scales are highly valid and reliable instruments for the Turkish society.

Abstract

There is a need for cancer-specific tools to evaluate loneliness and cancer-related negative social expectations before developing interventions for cancer patients. The purpose of this study was to examine the reliability and validity of the Cancer Loneliness and the Cancer-related Negative Social Expectations Scale. Data were collected from 300 cancer patients registered to an oncology outpatient clinic of a University Hospital for this methodological study. In the data collection, Patient Information Form, Cancer Loneliness Scale and Cancer-related Negative Social Expectations Scale and the General Loneliness Scale were used. The Cronbach’s Alpha coefficient of the Cancer Loneliness Scale was found to be .88, Spearman-Brown correlation value was found to be .81, CFI, .98, GFI, .96, 𝑋2/SD, 2.99 and RMSEA .08. As for the Negative Social Expectations Scale, Cronbach alpha value was found as .82, Spearman-Brown correlation value .86, CFI 1.00, GFI 1.00, 𝑋2/SD 1.33 and RMSEA .02. The study revealed those both scales were highly reliable and indices of fit showed perfect fit. These scales are highly valid and reliable instruments for the Turkish society.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ÇINAR, İ. Ö., KARA, E. (2022). Validity and Reliability of The Cancer Loneliness and The Cancer-Related Negative Social Expectations Scale. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3, 392–403. https://ajindex.com/articles/540143

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (11)

  1. Adams, R.N. (2016). Measures of Cancer-Related Loneliness and Negative Social Expectations: Development and Preliminary Validation, in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Doctoral dissertation). Indiana, Purdue University, 2016.
  2. Adams, R.N., Mosher, C.E., Rand, K.L., Hirsh, A.T., Monahan, P.O., Abonour, R. & Kroenke, K. (2017). The Cancer Loneliness Scale and Cancer-Related Negative Social Expectations Scale: Development and validation. Qual Life Res., 26(7), 1901 1913. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-017-1518-4
  3. Adams, R.N., Mosher, C.E., Winger, J.G., Abonour, R., & Kroenke, K. (2018). Cancer-related loneliness mediates the relationships between social constraints and symptoms among cancer patients, J Behav Med., 41(2), 243–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-017-9892-5
  4. Boyle, G. J., Saklofske, D. H., & Matthews, G. (2015). Criteria for Selection and Evaluation of Scales and Measures. In G. J. Boyle, D. H. Saklofske, & G. Matthews (Eds.), Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Constructs (p. 3–15). Elsevier Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-386915-9.00001-2
  5. Bray, F., Ferlay, J., Soerjomataram, I., Siegel, R.L., Torre, L.A., & Jemal, A. (2018). Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality World wide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin., 68(6), 394 424. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21492
  6. Brintzenhofe-Szoc, K.M., Levin, T.T., Li, Y., Kissane, D.W., & Zabora, J.R. (2009). Mixed anxiety/depression symptoms in a large cancer cohort: Prevalence by cancer type. Psychosomatics, 50(4), 383-391. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.psy.50.4.383
  7. Can, A. (2018). SPSS ile Bilimsel Araştırma Sürecinde Nicel Veri Analizi, Bir Ölçme Aracı ile Yapılan Ölçümün Güvenirliliğini Belirleme (p. 385-394). Ankara:
  8. Pegem Yayıncılık. Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G., & Büyüköztürk, Ş. (Eds). (2014). Sosyal Bilimler için Çok Değişkenli İstatistik SPSS ve LISREL Uygulamaları, Yapısal Eşitlik Modeli (p 251-407). Ankara:
  9. Pegem Yayıncılık. Davis, L. (1992). Instrument Review: Getting the Most From a Panel of Experts, Clinical Methods. Appl Nurs Res, 5(4), 194-197. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0897-1897(05)80008-4
  10. Deckx, L., Akker, M., & Buntinx, F. (2014). Risk factors for loneliness in patients with cancer: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Eur. J. Oncol. Nurs., 18(5), 466-477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejon.2014.05.002
  11. Demir, A. (1988). UCLA Yalnızlık Ölçeğinin Geçerlik ve G