Dergiler / International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education / 2020 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3

Reliability and Validity of TPACK Instruments in EFL

Sayfa
343–360
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The findings revealed that60% of the reviewed studies did not provide any index of reliability, and similarlyover 80% of the studies presented no evidence of validity.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:In this study, issues of validity and reliability of a wide range ofinstruments used to measure technological pedagogical content knowledge level ofEnglish teachers were discussed.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:As aresult of applying a set of criteria to publications retrieved from the databases, 60studies (including 40 articles, 14 dissertations and 6 conference papers) were foundsuitable for analysis in the current study.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The findings revealed that60% of the reviewed studies did not provide any index of reliability, and similarlyover 80% of the studies presented no evidence of validity.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

In this study, issues of validity and reliability of a wide range ofinstruments used to measure technological pedagogical content knowledge level ofEnglish teachers were discussed. To this end, the search in the databases of ERIC,ScienceDirect, Scopus, EBSCOhost, and Web of Science was conducted. As aresult of applying a set of criteria to publications retrieved from the databases, 60studies (including 40 articles, 14 dissertations and 6 conference papers) were foundsuitable for analysis in the current study. A two-level analysis was conducted. Firstone was study-level analysis focusing on general characteristics of each study andthe second one was an instrument-level analysis that focuses on target audienceand research instruments. As a consequence of the analysis at the study-level, 128instruments were classified into five types of instruments including, open-endedquestionnaire, observation, performance assessment, interview, and self-reportinstruments. At the instrument-level analysis, issues of validity and reliability ofthose instruments and target audience were investigated. The findings revealed that60% of the reviewed studies did not provide any index of reliability, and similarlyover 80% of the studies presented no evidence of validity.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ARSLAN, A. (2022). Reliability and Validity of TPACK Instruments in EFL. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3, 343–360. https://ajindex.com/articles/540124

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (8)

  1. Abera, B. (2014). Applying a technological pedagogical content knowledge framework in Ethiopian English language teacher education. In Multicultural Awareness and Technology in Higher Education: Global Perspectives, 286-301.
  2. IGI Global. Agyei, D. D., &Voogt, J. (2012). Developing technological pedagogical content knowledge in pre-service mathematics teachers through collaborative design. Australasian journal of educational technology, 28(4), 547-564.
  3. Alahmari, A. S. (2013). An investigation of Saudi Arabian EFL teachers' engagement with technology. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://monash.figshare.com/ 4701100_monash_120645.pdf Alhababi, H. H. (2017). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) effectiveness on English teachers and students in Saudi Arabia. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://digscholarship.unco.edu/dissertations/456/
  4. Ansyari, M. H. (2012). The development and evaluation of a professional development arrangement for technology integration to enhance communicative approach in English language teaching (unpublished master's thesis). Retrieved from https://essay.utwente.n l/62294/1/MSc_Ansyari_M.F._-_S1084712.pdf Ansyari, M. F. (2015). Designing and evaluating a professional development programme for basic technology integration in English as a foreign language (EFL) classrooms. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 31(6), 699-712.
  5. Archambault, L., & Crippen, K. (2009). Examining TPACK among K-12 online distance educators in the United States. Contemporary issues in technology and teacher education, 9(1), 71-88.
  6. Aşık, A., Eroğlu İnce, B., & Şarlanoğlu Vural, A. (2018). Investigating learning technology by design approach in pre-service language teacher education: Collaborative and reflective experiences. Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi,6(1), 37-53.
  7. Baser, D., Kopcha, T. J., &Ozden, M. Y. (2016). Developing a technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) assessment for preservice teachers learning to teach English as a foreign language. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29, 749–764.
  8. Berg, B. L. (2001). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon. Bordens, K. S., & Abbott, B. B. (2002). Research design and methods: A process approach. McGraw-Hill. Bowers, J. S., & Stephens, B. (2011). Using technology to explore mathematical relationships: A framework for orienting mathematics courses for prospective teachers. Journa