Dergiler / International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education / 2021 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3

Development of the Hostility in Pandemic Scale (HPS): A Validity and Reliability Study

Sayfa
475–486
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Results of the analysis revealed that, the Hostility Scale in Pandemic Process provides valid and reliable results.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The aim of this research is to develop Hostility in Pandemic Scale (HPS) for Turkey Population to determine the hostility levels of individuals, which is a factor affecting the mental well-being of the society during the pandemic.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The study group consists of 855 individuals between the ages of 18-65 from different genders, and have experienced the pandemic process.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Results of the analysis revealed that, the Hostility Scale in Pandemic Process provides valid and reliable results.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Hostility in pandemic · Pandemic · Hostility

Özet

The aim of this research is to develop Hostility in Pandemic Scale (HPS) for Turkey Population to determine the hostility levels of individuals, which is a factor affecting the mental well-being of the society during the pandemic. The study group consists of 855 individuals between the ages of 18-65 from different genders, and have experienced the pandemic process. For the construct validity of the scale results, exploratory factor analysis was conducted and a one-dimensional structure consisting of 22 items was revealed. It was determined that the variance explained by the scale showing a one-dimensional structure was 41.5%. As a result of the confirmatory factor analysis performed through a separate study group, it was revealed that all items have significant t values, and the model established according to model fit indexes has meaningful and acceptable fit values. Buss-Perry Aggression Scale was applied with HPS for the criterion validity. As a result of the criterion validity analysis, a significant relationship was found between the scale scores. The Cronbach Alpha was calculated to analyses internal consistency of the scale and a reliability level of 0.93 was obtained. The test-retest reliability results were found as 0.89. In addition, item statistics revealed that all of the scale items can discriminate well among the respondents. Results of the analysis revealed that, the Hostility Scale in Pandemic Process provides valid and reliable results.

Abstract

The aim of this research is to develop Hostility in Pandemic Scale (HPS) for Turkey Population to determine the hostility levels of individuals, which is a factor affecting the mental well-being of the society during the pandemic. The study group consists of 855 individuals between the ages of 18-65 from different genders, and have experienced the pandemic process. For the construct validity of the scale results, exploratory factor analysis was conducted and a one-dimensional structure consisting of 22 items was revealed. It was determined that the variance explained by the scale showing a one-dimensional structure was 41.5%. As a result of the confirmatory factor analysis performed through a separate study group, it was revealed that all items have significant t values, and the model established according to model fit indexes has meaningful and acceptable fit values. Buss-Perry Aggression Scale was applied with HPS for the criterion validity. As a result of the criterion validity analysis, a significant relationship was found between the scale scores. The Cronbach Alpha was calculated to analyses internal consistency of the scale and a reliability level of 0.93 was obtained. The test-retest reliability results were found as 0.89. In addition, item statistics revealed that all of the scale items can discriminate well among the respondents. Results of the analysis revealed that, the Hostility Scale in Pandemic Process provides valid and reliable results.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

TUNÇ, E. B., PARLAK, S., ULUMAN, M., ERYİGİT, D. (2022). Development of the Hostility in Pandemic Scale (HPS): A Validity and Reliability Study. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3, 475–486. https://ajindex.com/articles/540096

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (9)

  1. Bartos, V., Bauer, M., Cahlikova, J., Chytilová, J. (2020). Covid-19 Crisis Fuels Hostility Against Foreigners. CESifo Working Paper No. 8309, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3618833 Becerra-García. J.A., Giménez Ballesta, G., Sánchez-Gutiérrez, T., Barbeito Resa, S., Calvo Calvo, A. (2020). Psychopathological symptoms during Covid-19 quarantine in spanish general population: a preliminary analysis based on sociodemographic and occupational-contextual factors. Revista Espanola de Salud Publica, 94:e202006059. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbaa074
  2. Becker, E. W., & Lesiak, W. J. (1977). Feelings of hostility and personal control as related to depression. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 33(3), 654 657. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4679
  3. Buss, A. H., & Durkee, A. (1957). An inventory for assessing different kinds of hostility. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 21(4), 343–349. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046900
  4. Buss, A. H., & Perry, M. (1992). The aggression questionnaire. Journal of personality and social psychology, 63(3), 452. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.3.452
  5. Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications and programming. Taylor and Francis Group. Contrada, R. J. (1994). Personality and anger in cardiovascular disease: Toward a psychological model. In A. Siegman, & T. Smith (Eds.), Anger, hostility, and the heart (pp. 149-170).
  6. Erlbaum. Cook, W. W. & Medley, D. M. (1954) Proposed hosulity and Pharisaic-virtue scales for the MMPI. Journal of Applied Psychology, 38, 414-418.
  7. Crocker, L., and Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. Fort Worth: Holt, Rinehart and Winston Inc. Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G., Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2012). Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik: SPSS ve LISREL uygulamaları [Multivariate statistics for social sciences: SPSS and LISREL applications]. Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık. Demirtaş-Madran, H. A. (2012). Buss-Perry saldırganlık ölçeği’nin Türkçe formunun geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması [Reliability and Validity of the Buss-Perry Aggression Questionnaire-Turkish Version]. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 24(2), 1-6.
  8. Duan, H., Yan, L., Ding, X., Gan, Y., Kohn, N., & Wu, J. (2020). Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health in the general Chinese population: Changes, predictors and psychosocial correlates. Psychiatry Research, 293, 113396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113396
  9. World Health Organization (2020). Statement on the second mee