KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education / 2022 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 3

Investigation of education value perception scale's psychometric properties according to CTT and IRT

Harun DİLEK
Ufuk AKBAŞ
Sayfa
548–564
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

In the test-retest applications performed at 20-day intervals, the stability coefficient was found to be.81.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The purpose of this study is to develop Education Value Perception Scale (EVPS) based on Bronfenbrenner's Ecological Theory and to investigate its psychometric properties according to Classical Test Theory (CTT) and Item Response Theory (IRT).
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The data were collected from 2872 secondary school students by stratified purposeful sampling method.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:In the test-retest applications performed at 20-day intervals, the stability coefficient was found to be.81.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to develop Education Value Perception Scale (EVPS) based on Bronfenbrenner's Ecological Theory and to investigate its psychometric properties according to Classical Test Theory (CTT) and Item Response Theory (IRT). The data were collected from 2872 secondary school students by stratified purposeful sampling method. Measurement invariance of EVPS was tested by multigroup confirmatory factor analysis based on gender, and scalar invariance was observed to have been provided. The estimations based on IRT were conducted based on Graded Response Model. While high positive correlations were found between the item discriminations estimated according to different test theories, high negative correlations were identified between item means. McDonald’s Omega was calculated to be .79 according to CTT from reliability estimation methods, marginal reliability coefficient was determined to be .77 according to IRT. In the test-retest applications performed at 20-day intervals, the stability coefficient was found to be.81.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

DİLEK, H., AKBAŞ, U. (2022). Investigation of education value perception scale's psychometric properties according to CTT and IRT. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 3, 548–564. https://ajindex.com/articles/540046

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (11)

  1. Akbaş, U., & Koğar, H. (2020). Nicel araştırmalarda kayıp veriler ve uç değerler: çözüm önerileri ve SPSS uygulamaları [Missing data and outliers in quantitative research; solution suggestions and SPSS applications]. Pegem Akademi. Aliyev, R., Akbaş, U., & Özbay, Y. (2021). Mediating role of internal factors in predicting academic resilience. International Journal of School & Educational Psychology, 3(29), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/21683603.2021.1904068
  2. Arı, R. (2008). Eğitim psikolojisi [Educational psychology]. Nobel. Arıcak, O.T., Avcu, A., Topçu, F., & Tutlu, M.G. (2020). Use of item response theory to validate cyberbullying sensibility scale for university students. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Educaiton, 7(1), 18-29. https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.629584
  3. Arıcı, İ. (2007). The effective factors on the students in the religious culture and ethics course [Doctoral dissertation]. Hacettepe University, Ankara. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezSorguSonucYeni.jsp
  4. Aslantürk, İ. (2018). Ecological system theory development of a basic school safety measurement [Master’s dissertation] Ahi Evran Universtiy, Kırşehir. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezSorguSonucYeni.jsp
  5. Ayre, C., & Scally, A.J. (2014). Critical values for Lawshe’s content validity ratio: Revisiting the original methods of calculation. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 47(1), 79-86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0748175613513808
  6. Baker, F.B. (2001). The basic of item response theory. ERIC. Başusta, N.B., & Gelbal, S. (2015). Gruplararası karşılaştırmarda ölçme değişmezliğinin test edilmesi: PISA öğrenci anketi örneği [Testing measurement invariance in comparisons between groups: Pisa student survey sample]. Hacettepe U. Journal of Education, 30(4), 80-90.
  7. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1977). Toward experimental ecology of human development. American Psychogist, 32(7), 513-531. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.32.7.513
  8. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and desing. Harvard Universty Press.
  9. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1986). Ecology of the family as a context for human development: Research perspectives. Developmental Psychology, 22(6), 723 742. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.22.6.723
  10. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1994). Ecological models of human development. International Encyclopedia of Education, 3(2), 37-43.
  11. Bronfenbrenner, U., & Ceci, S.J. (2004). Nature-nurture reconceptualized in developmental perspective: A bioe