KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / International Advanced Researches and Engineering Journal / 2021 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2

Application of the Muskingum-Cunge routing method with variable parameters in a gauged creek reach

Hülya ÇAKIR
Mustafa Erol KESKİN
Sayfa
268–274
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

In conclusion, observed and computed outflow hydrographs were compared and it was seen that the VPMC flood routing method was suitable for the gauged creek reach, which was the subject of this study.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:In general, the Muskingum-Cunge method is used to route floods when observed flood data are not available.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In this study, applicability of the Variable Parameter Muskingum-Cunge (VPMC) flood routing method was investigated in a gauged creek reach.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:In conclusion, observed and computed outflow hydrographs were compared and it was seen that the VPMC flood routing method was suitable for the gauged creek reach, which was the subject of this study.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Flood routing · HEC-HMS · Muskingum-Cunge

Abstract

In general, the Muskingum-Cunge method is used to route floods when observed flood data are not available. In this study, applicability of the Variable Parameter Muskingum-Cunge (VPMC) flood routing method was investigated in a gauged creek reach. The reach was between two stream gauging stations. Some physical characteristics of the reach, such as length, bed slope, cross sections, and Manning’s coefficient (n), were determined by using digital topographical map of the reach, inflow, and also outflow data of the two stream gauging stations. The HEC-HMS hydrological model was used to route the inflow hydrograph through using the VPMC method. In conclusion, observed and computed outflow hydrographs were compared and it was seen that the VPMC flood routing method was suitable for the gauged creek reach, which was the subject of this study.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ÇAKIR, H., KESKİN, M. E. (2022). Application of the Muskingum-Cunge routing method with variable parameters in a gauged creek reach. International Advanced Researches and Engineering Journal, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2, 268–274. https://ajindex.com/articles/539274

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (18)

  1. Chow, V.T., Maidment, D.R., Mays, L.W., Applied Hydrology. 1988, USA; McGraw-Hill Inc
  2. Zhang, S., L. Kang, L. Zhou, X. Guo, A new modified nonlinear Muskingum model and its parameter estimation using the adaptive genetic algorithm. Hydrology Research, 2016. 48(1): p. 17-27
  3. Heatherman, W.J., Flood routing on small streams: A review of Muskingum-Cunge, cascading reservoirs, and full dynamic solutions. The degree of Doctor of Philosophy, University of Kansas, 2008, USA
  4. Shaw, E.M., Hydrology in Practice. 2005, USA: Taylor&Francis Group
  5. McCarthy G.T., The unit hydrograph and flood routing. Unpublished m/s conference of US Army Corps of Engineers. 1938, USA
  6. Perumal, M., G. Tayfur, C.M. Rao, G. Gürarslan, Evaluation of a physically based quasi-linear and a conceptually based nonlinear Muskingum methods. Journal of Hydrology, 2017. 546: p. 437-449
  7. Todini, E., A mass conservative and water storage consistent variable parameter Muskingum-Cunge approach. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions, 2007. 11: p. 1645–1659
  8. Barati, R., G.H. Akbari, S. Rahimi, Flood routing of an unmanaged river basin using Muskingum–Cunge model; field application and numerical experiments. Caspian Journal of Applied Sciences Research, 2013. 2(6): p. 8-20
  9. Ponce, V.M., A. Lugo, Modeling looped ratings in Muskingum-Cunge routing. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 2001. 6(2): p. 119–125
  10. Szel, S., C. Gaspar, On the negative weighting factors in the Muskingum-Cunge scheme. Journal Of Hydraulic Research, 2000. 38(4): p. 299-306
  11. Perumal, M., B. Sahoo, Volume conservation controversy of the variable parameter Muskingum–Cunge method. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2008. 134(4): p. 475-485
  12. Price, R.K., Flood routing methods for British rivers. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, 1973. 55(12): p. 913-930
  13. Price, R.K., Flood routing. Developments in Hydraulic Engineering. 1985. 3: p. 129-173
  14. Ponce, V.M., V. Yevjevich, Muskingum-Cunge method with variable parameters. Journal of Hydr. Div., 1978. 104(12): p. 1663-1667
  15. Ponce, V.M., F.D. Theurer, Accuracy criteria in diffusion routing. J. Hydr.Div., 1982. 1086: p. 747-757
  16. Ponce, V.M., P.V. Chaganti, Variable-parameter Muskingum-Cunge method revisited. J. Hydrol., 1994. 162(3–4): p. 433-439
  17. Ponce, V.M., A.K. Lohani, C. Scheyhing, Analytical verification of Muskingum-Cunge routing. J. Hydrol., 1996. 174(3–4): p. 235-241
  18. Franchini, M., A. Bernini, S. Berbe