Dergiler / International Advanced Researches and Engineering Journal / 2022 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2

Research on the success of unsupervised learning algorithms in indoor location prediction

Sayfa
148–153
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Although performances indicators are very close to each other according to the internal indexes, it can be stated that the model obtained using the Manhattan distance measure and the k-Means algorithm has higher performance in terms of clustering success.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:With location-based smart applications, the flow of life can be facilitated and support can be provided in case of security and emergency situations.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The obtained methods performances have been evaluated with internal and external indices.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Although performances indicators are very close to each other according to the internal indexes, it can be stated that the model obtained using the Manhattan distance measure and the k-Means algorithm has higher performance in terms of clustering success.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Custering · External indices · Fuzzy c-Means

Abstract

With location-based smart applications, the flow of life can be facilitated and support can be provided in case of security and emergency situations. Indoor location detection provides various conveniences in complex structures such as hospitals, schools, shopping centers, etc. Indoor location detection studies are carried out by using data related to location and signal and machine learning methods. Machine learning has become frequently used as a solution method in this field, as in many other fields. When the studies in the literature are examined, it is seen that the studies are mainly focused on producing solutions with supervised machine learning algorithms. Unsupervised algorithms are frequently used to determine the labels of data groups that do not have labels. In this direction, it can be seen as the first step in labeling the data collected in indoor positioning studies and then using it for training predictive models to be developed with supervised learning methods. For this reason, the results to be obtained regarding the success and usefulness of cluster analysis will constitute an important basis for further studies. In this study, it is aimed to examine the success of unsupervised learning, in other words, clustering algorithms. The Wireless Indoor Localization Data Set and well-known k-Means and Fuzzy c-Means algorithms have been used with different distance measure. The obtained methods performances have been evaluated with internal and external indices. The results show that the clustering algorithms can cluster correctly data points in the range of 93-95% according to the accuracy and F measure value. Although performances indicators are very close to each other according to the internal indexes, it can be stated that the model obtained using the Manhattan distance measure and the k-Means algorithm has higher performance in terms of clustering success.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KOÇOĞLU, F. Ö. (2022). Research on the success of unsupervised learning algorithms in indoor location prediction. International Advanced Researches and Engineering Journal, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2, 148–153. https://ajindex.com/articles/539248

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Hazas, M., J. Scott, and J. Krumm, Location-aware computing comes of age. Computer, 2004. 37(2): p. 95–97
  2. Oguntala, G., R. Abd-Alhameed, S. Jones, J. Noras, M. Patwary, and J. Rodriguez, Indoor location identification technologies for real-time IoT-based applications: An inclusive survey. Computer Science Review, 2018. 30: p. 55–79
  3. Curran, K. E. Furey, T. Lunney, J. Santos, D. Woods, and A. McCaughey, An evaluation of indoor location determination technologies. Journal of Location Based Services, 2011. 5(2): p. 61–78
  4. Nath, R.K., R. Bajpai, and H. Thapliyal, IoT based indoor location detection system for smart home environment, in IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics (ICCE). 2018. Las Vegas, USA: p. 1-3
  5. Roy P. and C. Chowdhury, A survey of machine learning techniques for indoor localization and navigation systems. J Intell Robot Syst, 2021. 101(3): p. 63
  6. Jedari, E., Z. Wu, R. Rashidzadeh, and M. Saif, Wi-Fi based indoor location positioning employing random forest classifier, in International Conference on Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation (IPIN), 2015. Calgary, Canada: p. 1–5
  7. Tabbakha, N.E., W.-H. Tan, and C.-P. Ooi, Indoor location and motion tracking system for elderly assisted living home, in International Conference on Robotics, Automation and Sciences (ICORAS), 2017. Melaka, Malaysia: p. 1–4
  8. Chao C. and M. Xiaoran, An innovative indoor location algorithm based on supervised learning and wifi fingerprint classification, in Signal and Information Processing, Networking and Computers, 2018. Singapore: pp. 238–246
  9. Nuño-Maganda, M.A., H. Herrera-Rivas, C. Torres-Huitzil, H. Marisol Marín-Castro, and Y. Coronado-Pérez, On-device learning of indoor location for wifi fingerprint approach. Sensors, 2018. 18(7)
  10. Elbes, M., E. Almaita, T. Alrawashdeh, T. Kanan, S. AlZu’bi, and B. Hawashin, An indoor localization approach based on deep learning for indoor location-based services, in IEEE Jordan International Joint Conference on Electrical Engineering and Information Technology (JEEIT), 2019. Amman, Jordan: p. 437–441
  11. Dai, P., Y. Yang, M. Wang, and R. Yan, Combination of DNN and improved KNN for indoor location fingerprinting. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 2019. p. e4283857
  12. Ouameur, M.A., M. Caza-Szoka, and D. Massicotte, Machine learning enabled tools and methods for indoor localization using low power wireless network. Internet of Things, 2020. 12: 100300
  13. Polak, L., S.