Dergiler / Insight Turkey / 2022 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 01

The Problem of Overextension: Analyzing America’s Black Sea Policies through Jentleson’s 4 Ps Framework

Sayfa
229–248
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The article argues that this transformation was problematic because of two obstacles –the illusion of the unipolar moment and the growing polarization in American domestic politics– which prevented the U.S. from following an effective policy in the Black Sea region.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Historically, the U.S. strategy in the Black Sea region has been stable, limited, and not ambitious as American administrations prioritized certain foreign policy objectives over other interests.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:This careful strategy was transformed during the Clinton Administration in the mid-1990s as the U.S. started following an extensive foreign policy framework, which included all American national interests, formulated by Bruce Jentleson in his 4Ps framework: power, peace, prosperity, and principles.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The article argues that this transformation was problematic because of two obstacles –the illusion of the unipolar moment and the growing polarization in American domestic politics– which prevented the U.S. from following an effective policy in the Black Sea region.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Historically, the U.S. strategy in the Black Sea region has been stable, limited, and not ambitious as American administrations prioritized certain foreign policy objectives over other interests. This careful strategy was transformed during the Clinton Administration in the mid-1990s as the U.S. started following an extensive foreign policy framework, which included all American national interests, formulated by Bruce Jentleson in his 4Ps framework: power, peace, prosperity, and principles. The article argues that this transformation was problematic because of two obstacles –the illusion of the unipolar moment and the growing polarization in American domestic politics– which prevented the U.S. from following an effective policy in the Black Sea region.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KÖSE, İ., ÜLGÜL, M. (2022). The Problem of Overextension: Analyzing America’s Black Sea Policies through Jentleson’s 4 Ps Framework. Insight Turkey, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 01, 229–248. https://ajindex.com/articles/539146

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (7)

  1. Andrew Roth, “Ukraine President Warns Russia Tensions Could Lead to ‘Full-Scale War,’” The Guardian, (November 28, 2018), retrieved June 1, 2021, from https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/nov/27/ russia-to-charge-ukrainian-sailors-as-kerch-crisis-deepens
  2. Brett Samuels, “GOP Senator: ‘I Think We Need to Do More’ to Respond to Russian Aggression toward Ukraine,” The Hill, (December 2, 2018), retrieved June 1, 2021, from https://thehill.com/homenews/sunday-talk-shows/419340-gop-senator-i-think-we-need-to-do-more-to-respond-to-russian. 3. “USS Donald Cook Departs Odessa, Ukraine,” United States Navy, (February 27, 2019), retrieved June 1, 2021, from
  3. Noah Weiland, “5 Times the Trump Administration Has Been Tougher than Trump on Russia,” New York Times, (January 21, 2019), retrieved June 1, 2021, from
  4. Bruce W. Jentleson, American Foreign Policy: The Dynamics of Choice in the 21st Century, (New York: W. W. Norton and Company, 2010), p. 9
  5. Laura Silver, “Americans Differ from People in Other Societies Over Some Aspects of U.S. ‘Hard’ and ‘Soft’ Power,” Pew Research Center, (November 1, 2021), retrieved January 4, 2022, from https://www. pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2021/11/01/americans-differ-from-people-in-other-societies-over-someaspects-of-u-s-hard-and-soft-power/. 7. “In a Politically Polarized Era, Shard Divides in Both Partisan Coalitions,” Pew Research Center, (December 17, 2019), retrieved January 4, 2022, from https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2019/12/17/ 6-views-of-foreign-policy/. 8. “In a Politically Polarized Era, Shard Divides in Both Partisan Coalitions.
  6. Bradley Jones, “Americans Are Generally Positive about Free Trade Agreements, More Critical of Tariff Increases,” Pew Research Center, (May 10, 2018), retrieved January 4, 2022, from https://www. pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/05/10/americans-are-generally-positive-about-free-trade-agreements-more-critical-of-tariff-increases/
  7. James W. Skillen, “Three Zionisms in the Shaping of American Foreign Policy,” in Jonathan Chaplin and Robert Joustra (eds.), God and Global Order: The Power of Religion in American Foreign Policy, (Texas: Baylor University Press, 2010), p. 90. 11. “Conflicting Partisan Priorities for U.S. Foreign Policy,” Pew Research Center, (November 29, 2018), retrieved January 4, 2022, from https://www.pewresearch.org