According to the character of artistic creativity, contact with nature can have a positive influence on art students' environmental satisfaction.
📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale
🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This study seeks to explore the role of university campus quality in artstudents' satisfaction.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Satisfaction and dissatisfaction fromthe art students' point of view can be used as criteria for the campusplanning, design and management to improve participation inenvironmental interaction and desire to more artistic performance.Data collection of the research was undertaken through a field studyusing photography, behavior monitoring and a questionnaire filled inby a sample of art students in Tabriz Islamic Art University.Descriptions and analysis of the results shows that the art students'satisfaction with their university campus environment is at a mid-levelidentity and legibility, access in the campus, sociability, livability,territoriality & control are of the main physical-psychological factors that may influence students' environmental satisfaction.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:According to the character of artistic creativity, contact with nature can have a positive influence on art students' environmental satisfaction.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri
Abstract
This study seeks to explore the role of university campus quality in artstudents' satisfaction. Environmental satisfaction is one of the keycriteria by which the extent of university educational quality may bedetermined. An educational environment of high quality campusconveys a sense of satisfaction with university environment that maybe physical, social and symbolic. Satisfaction and dissatisfaction fromthe art students' point of view can be used as criteria for the campusplanning, design and management to improve participation inenvironmental interaction and desire to more artistic performance.Data collection of the research was undertaken through a field studyusing photography, behavior monitoring and a questionnaire filled inby a sample of art students in Tabriz Islamic Art University.Descriptions and analysis of the results shows that the art students'satisfaction with their university campus environment is at a mid-levelidentity and legibility, access in the campus, sociability, livability,territoriality & control are of the main physical-psychological factors that may influence students' environmental satisfaction. According to the character of artistic creativity, contact with nature can have a positive influence on art students' environmental satisfaction.
🔖
Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap
KHALEGHİMOGHADDAM, N. (2022). Assessment of Satisfaction and Environmental Preferences of Students. ICONARP International Journal Of Architecture And Planning, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2, 96–107. https://ajindex.com/articles/538374
Baba, Y., Austin D. M., (1989). Neighborhood environmental satisfaction: Victimization and social participation as determinants of perceived neighborhood safety, Environment and Behaviour, Vol.21, No.6. Bell, P. A., Greene, T.C., Fisher, J. D. & Baum, A. (2001). Environmental Psychology. Journal of Environment and Behavior(The Soft Classroom). Craik, K., Feimer, N. R. (1987). Environmental assessment. In D. Stokols & Altman (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (pp 891-918). NewYork: Wiley. Daneshpoor, A., (2004). Recognition of The Identity of The Manmade Environment, Journal of Bagh-I-Nzar, No.1 Tehran. Iran. Dober, R., (1963). Cmpus Planning. New York: Reinhold Publishing Co. Gharavi, M., (2008). Qualitative Evaluation of University ofTehran. Journal of Fine Arts, University of Tehran, No(35), Autumn, pp. 75-84.
Responsive Environments., Routledge; Revised ed. Isiaka, A., & Siong, H. C. (2008). Developing Sustainable Index For University Campus. Paper presented at the EASTS International Symposium on Sustainable Transportation incorporating Malaysian Universities Transport Research Forum Conference. Kaplan, S., & Kaplan, R. (2003). Health, supportive environments, and the reasonable person model. American Journal of Public Health, 93(9), 1484-1489.
Kopec, D. (2006). Environmental Psychology for design. Rafieian M., Khodaei Z., (2009). Evaluation Criteria and Standards Affecting The Satisfaction of Citizens in Urban Public Spaces, Journal of Rahbord, No.53. pp. 227-248.
Razak, M. Z. A., Abdullah, N. A. G., Nor, M. F. I. M., Usman, I. M., & Che-Ani, A. I. (2011). Toward a sustainable campus: Comparison of the physical development planning of research university campuses in Malaysia. Journal of Sustainable Development, 4(4), 210. Rezazadeh, R., (2002). New urban design strategies for pedestrian safety in Tehran, 16th international conference on safe communities, Iran. Shamsuddin, S., Sulaiman, A. B., Lamit, H., Omar, R., Aziz, N. A., & Noor, M. M. (2007). Kriteria Reka Bentuk Persekitaran Kampus Yang Kondusif Bagi Institusi Pengajian Tinggi Di Malaysia. University Teknologi Malaysia (2007 (b). Sharghi, A., (2011). Effects of University Campus Landscapes on Learning Quality of Students (Functional Analysis of Attention Restoration Theory), Journal of Bagh-e Nazar, Vol.8/No.18. pp. 25-36.
Tehran. Iran. Sommer, R., Olsen, H., (1980). The soft classroom. Journal of Environment and Behavi