Dergiler / ICONARP International Journal Of Architecture And Planning / 2016 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1

The Implementation of Sustainable Approaches in the Architectural Design Studio Developing Architectural Designs Using the Solar Envelope Method

Sayfa
14–33
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The projects were all formed on the basis of the rhythm of nature, which attached more value and meaning to architecture.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Teaching students the notion of sustainability during their architectural education is of great importance.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The authors think that the limitations increased creativity and allowed interesting and unusual solutions.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The projects were all formed on the basis of the rhythm of nature, which attached more value and meaning to architecture.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Teaching students the notion of sustainability during their architectural education is of great importance. The architectural design studio course is the most important environment in which theory and practice can be brought together. In this study, the development of architectural design by using the solar envelope method–which can be considered within the scope of sustainable architecture–was examined in the architectural design studio course in the department of architecture in our university. In the design studio, students had the opportunity to directly observe the impact and use of scientific information that is often difficult to obtain and access. The advantages and disadvantages that appear during the application of this mentioned method was identified based on the observations that were made, and feedback was provided by the students. This method helped the students in conceiving architectural projects in the context of sustainability in a more applied way rather than as a superficial and solely theoretic concept. Through this method, students have gained additional sensitivity regarding solar architecture and perceived its effect on form and space. According to the feedback obtained from students, the most important disadvantage was design freedom. Students found it stringent to be bound to make their designs within very well established boundaries from the early stages. The authors think that the limitations increased creativity and allowed interesting and unusual solutions. The projects were all formed on the basis of the rhythm of nature, which attached more value and meaning to architecture.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

CANAN, F., TOSUNLAR, M. B. (2022). The Implementation of Sustainable Approaches in the Architectural Design Studio Developing Architectural Designs Using the Solar Envelope Method. ICONARP International Journal Of Architecture And Planning, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1, 14–33. https://ajindex.com/articles/538364

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (11)

  1. Canan, F., Korumaz, M. & Güleç, S.A. (2006). Vision evaluation of the Students in architecture about sustainable architecture in a local context in Konya / Turkey, Proceedings PLEA 2006,
  2. Hes.So, Université de Genève, Vol.2, pp. 785 -791. Canan, F. (2008). A trial of model for controlling the parameters in energy efficient architectural design, PhD thesis, Selçuk University, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Konya. Çakmak Yılmaz, B. (2015). Solar Energy Potential of Konya and Architectural Design Criterias for Solar Energy Efficiency, International Conference on Renewable Energy Research and Applications (ICRERA), Palermo. Capeluto, I.G. & Shaviv, E. (2001). On the use of solar volume for determining the urban fabric, Solar Energy, Vol. 70-3, pp. 275- 280. Capeluto, I.G. (2003). Energy performance of the self- shading building envelope, Energy and Buildings, Vol. 35, pp. 327-336.
  3. Capeluto, I.G., Yezioro, A. Bleiberg, T. & Shaviv, E. (2006). Solar rights in the design of urban spaces, Plea 2006, Proceedings PLEA 2006,
  4. Hes.So, Université de Genève, Vol.1, pp. 689-694.
  5. Cotton, J.F. (1996). Solid modeling as a tool for constructing solar envelopes, Automation in Construction, Vol. 5, pp. 185-192.
  6. De Herde, A. & Dartevelle, O. (2010). U.C.L. and sustainable architecture education in Belgium, Le Carré Bleu, Feuille Internationale d’Architecture, No. 3-4, pp.53-56.
  7. Dimitrova, E. (2014). The ‘sustainable development’ concept in urban planning education: lessons learned on a Bulgarian path, Journal of Cleaner Production,Vol. 62, pp. 120–127.
  8. El- Zeiny, R.M.A. (2010). Sustainability in the Education of Interior designers in Egypt, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 38, pp. 122 – 131. Forwood, B. (1994). Expressing sustainability in architectural form: energy and environment as architectural metaphors, Renewable Energy, Vol. 5, part 2, pp. 1132-1134.
  9. Karol, E. (2006). Using campus concerns about sustainability as an educational opportunity: a case study in architectural design, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 14, pp. 780–786.
  10. Granadeiro, V., Duarte, J. P., Correia, J.R. & Leal, V.M.S. (2013). Building envelope shape design in early stages of the design process: Integrating architectural design systems and energy simulation, Automation in Construction, Vol. 532, pp.196–209.
  11. Houpert, D. (2003). Approche inverse pour la résolution de contraintes solaires et visuelles dans le projet architectural et urbain- développement et application du l