Dergiler / ICONARP International Journal Of Architecture And Planning / 2017 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2

Neighbourhood Patterns in Istanbul: From Historical Form to Manhattanization

Sayfa
172–190
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The present study investigates the selected neighbourhood patterns from historical to westernized, modern, postmodern (gated) and Manhattanized forms

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:During the last century, the transformation of Istanbul’s urban structure from monocentric to multi-centric and its rapid population growth resulted in neighbourhood patterns which are spread across a large spectrum according to their location and their cultural, socio-economic and historical backgrounds.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In urban settings, the potential environment is reinterpreted by its users, and is realized through the application of the space and time-specific societal norms within the context of technological advances.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The present study investigates the selected neighbourhood patterns from historical to westernized, modern, postmodern (gated) and Manhattanized forms
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

During the last century, the transformation of Istanbul’s urban structure from monocentric to multi-centric and its rapid population growth resulted in neighbourhood patterns which are spread across a large spectrum according to their location and their cultural, socio-economic and historical backgrounds. In urban settings, the potential environment is reinterpreted by its users, and is realized through the application of the space and time-specific societal norms within the context of technological advances. The present study investigates the selected neighbourhood patterns from historical to westernized, modern, postmodern (gated) and Manhattanized forms

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ERTEKİN, Ö., ORUÇ, G. D., DÖKMECİ, V., URBAN, P. D. (2022). Neighbourhood Patterns in Istanbul: From Historical Form to Manhattanization. ICONARP International Journal Of Architecture And Planning, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2, 172–190. https://ajindex.com/articles/538356

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Ahmad, N. (1992). Choice of location and mobility behavior of migrant in a third world city. Urban Studies, 29, 1147- 1157. Akgun, A.A. and Baycan, T. (2011). Gated communities in Istanbul: The new walls of the city. Town Planning Review, 83, 1, DOI: 10.3828/tpr.2012.5 Aksoy, O. (1968). Osmanlı Devri Istanbul Sıbyan Mektepleri Üzerine Bir İnceleme, Ph.D. Thesis. Istanbul Technical University. Asami, Y., Kubat, A.S. and Istek, C. (2000). Characterization of the street networks in the Turkish urban form. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 28, 5, 777-795.
  2. Audirac, I. (2002). Information technology on urban forms. Journal of Planning Literature, 17, 2, 213-256.
  3. Bardo, J.W. (1984). A reexamination of the neighbourhood as a socio-spatial schema. Social Inquiry, 54, 3, 346-357.
  4. Bardo, J. W. and Dokmeci, V. (1992). Modernization, traditionalization and the changing structure of community satisfaction in two sub-communities in Istanbul, Turkey: Procrastination analysis. Genetic, Social and General Psychology Monographs, 118, 273-292.
  5. Brower, S. (1992). Introduction: Influences on Urban form. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 9, 4 (Winter), 271-273.
  6. Bundhun, R. (2016). Moving up, to escape the crowd. International New York Times, March 4, p.12. Castells, M. (1994). European cities, the informational society, and the global economy. New Left Review, 204, 18-32.
  7. Celik, Z. (1993). The Remaking of Istanbul: Portrait of an Ottoman City in the Nineteenth Century. Berkeley and Los Angeles, California: University of California Press.
  8. Conzen, M.R.G. (2004). Thinking about Urban Form: Paper on Urban Morphology, 1932-1998. New York: Peter Lang. Coy, P. and Pöhler, M. (2002). Gated communities in Latin American mega cities: Case studies in Brazil, and Argentina. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 29, 355-370.
  9. Dix, G. (1990). Conservation and change in the city. Third World Planning Review, 12, 385-406.
  10. Dokmeci, V. and Berkoz, L. (1994). Transformation of Istanbul from a monocentric to a polycentric city. European Planning Studies,2, 2, 193-205.
  11. Dokmeci, V. and Ciraci, H. (1988). Pera: A threatened historic European city within Istanbul. Ekistics, 333, Nov.-Dec., 359-369.
  12. Dokmeci, V., Berkoz, L., Levent, H., Yürekli, H. and Cagdas, G. (1996). Residential preferences in Istanbul. Habitat International, 20, 2, 241-251.
  13. Dokmeci, V. and Ciraci, H. (1999). From westernization to globalization: An old district of Istanbul. Planning History, 21