KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / ICONARP International Journal Of Architecture And Planning / 2017 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1

Urban DNA: Morphogenetic Analysis of Urban Pattern

Fulin BÖLEN
H Serdar KAYA
Sayfa
10–41
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

As the proposed model shows essential morphological characteristics of urban pattern as a morphological DNA, outputs of this model has a potential to be used in different areas such as comparative analysis of geometrically different cities, analyzing irregularities in urban pattern, controlling growth and density by controlling parameter values, creating urban sub-systems by combining components in different scales.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Urban pattern is the result of a dynamic transformation process, which can follow two different trajectories: planned interventions generally produces clear geometrical patterns in large areas, however, unplanned transformation process needs more time and has relatively smaller and partial effects on the urban pattern but creates more complex urban patterns.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Highly complex spatial structure of urban pattern governed by local and global forces should be analyzed via advanced methods that corresponds the complexity of the pattern.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:As the proposed model shows essential morphological characteristics of urban pattern as a morphological DNA, outputs of this model has a potential to be used in different areas such as comparative analysis of geometrically different cities, analyzing irregularities in urban pattern, controlling growth and density by controlling parameter values, creating urban sub-systems by combining components in different scales.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Urban pattern is the result of a dynamic transformation process, which can follow two different trajectories: planned interventions generally produces clear geometrical patterns in large areas, however, unplanned transformation process needs more time and has relatively smaller and partial effects on the urban pattern but creates more complex urban patterns. Highly complex spatial structure of urban pattern governed by local and global forces should be analyzed via advanced methods that corresponds the complexity of the pattern. Analyses of the dynamic structure of the multidimensional urban system shows the necessity of using advanced methods and several parameters together. The aim of this paper is developing a new method to analyze and represent highly complex urban pattern via evaluating geometrical, topological, and mathematical parameters to evaluate essential characteristics of cities. Physical space is analyzed by ‘geometrical parameters’, ‘topological parameters’, ‘parameters related to use and perception’ and ‘parameters related to complexity’. Calculation results gives two main information about urban structure: Firstly, values gives information about spatial characteristics and diversity of urban pattern. Secondly, the spatialdistribution map of changing urban pattern reflects the unique structure of settlements, which resembles DNA of living creatures. In this paper, Istanbul was selected as case study area because of the rich historical background and dynamic urban growth process resulting various types of settlements including historical settlements, old villages, unplanned development, squatter areas and gated communities with different densities. As the proposed model shows essential morphological characteristics of urban pattern as a morphological DNA, outputs of this model has a potential to be used in different areas such as comparative analysis of geometrically different cities, analyzing irregularities in urban pattern, controlling growth and density by controlling parameter values, creating urban sub-systems by combining components in different scales.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

BÖLEN, F., KAYA, H. S. (2022). Urban DNA: Morphogenetic Analysis of Urban Pattern. ICONARP International Journal Of Architecture And Planning, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1, 10–41. https://ajindex.com/articles/538352

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (16)

  1. Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S., & Silverstein, M. (1977). A pattern language: towns, buildings, construction. New York: Oxford University Press.
  2. Ashihara, Y. (1983).
  3. The Aesthetic Townscape. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  4. Bacon, E. N. (1975). Design of cities: Thames and Hudson London. Bar-Yam, Y. (2003). Dynamics of Complex Systems: Westview Press.
  5. Batty, M. (2008). Generating Cities from the Bottom-Up: Using Complexity Theory for Effective Design. Cluster. Retrieved from http://www.cluster.eu/v2/editions/batty/
  6. Batty, M., & Rana, S. (2004). The automatic definition and generation of axial lines and axial maps. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 31, 615-640.
  7. Boccaletti, S., Latora, V., Moreno, Y., Chavez, M., & Hwang, D. U. (2006). Complex networks: Structure and dynamics. Physics Reports, 424(4-5), 175-308.
  8. Bolliger, J., Lischke, H., & Green, D. G. (2005). Simulating the spatial and temporal dynamics of landscapes using generic and complex models. Ecological Complexity, 2(2), 107-116.
  9. Çağdaş, G. (1996). A shape grammar: the language of traditional Turkish houses. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 23, 443-464.
  10. Chen, Y., & Zhou, Y. (2003). The rank-size rule and fractal hierarchies of cities: mathematical models and empirical analyses. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 30, 799-818.
  11. Chen, Y., & Zhou, Y. (2004). Multi-fractal measures of city-size distributions based on the three-parameter Zipf model. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 22(4), 793-805.
  12. Chen, Y., & Zhou, Y. (2008). Scaling laws and indications of selforganized criticality in urban systems. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 35(1), 85-98.
  13. Cheng, Q. (1999). Multifractality and spatial statistics. Computers & Geosciences, 25(9), 949-961.
  14. Figueiredo, L., & Amorim, L. (2005). Continuity lines in the axial system. Paper presented at the Proceedings 5th International Symposium on Space Syntax, Delft University of Technology, Delft. Filho, M. B., & Sobreira, F. (2005). Assessing Texture Pattern in Slums Across Scales. Casa Working Paper Series, No. 87. Centre for Advanced Planning Analysis, University College London. London. Retrieved from http://www.casa.ucl.ac.uk/working_papers/paper87.pdf
  15. Frankhauser, P. (1998a). The Fractal Approach. A New Tool for the Spatial Analysis of Urban Agglomerations. Population: An English Selection, 10(1), 205-240.
  16. Frankhauser, P. (1998b). Fractal geometry of urban patterns and their morphogenesis. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2(2), 127