KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / ICONARP International Journal Of Architecture And Planning / 2017 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2

Agglomerations, Human and Social Capital: The case of Manufacturing Industry in Konya-Turkey

Özer KARAKAYACI
Sayfa
216–233
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Therefore, it can be said that human-social-spatial resources within a region has had a major role in developing by essays of the new economic geography

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Over the last three decades, new planning paradigms have exploded the factors depending on socio-cultural characteristics of space, in contrary to regional science.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:These paradigms argue the strategy for economic, social development and growth of regions instead of traditional theories which focus on spatial analysis as distance, transportation cost, labour cost.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Therefore, it can be said that human-social-spatial resources within a region has had a major role in developing by essays of the new economic geography
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Over the last three decades, new planning paradigms have exploded the factors depending on socio-cultural characteristics of space, in contrary to regional science. These paradigms argue the strategy for economic, social development and growth of regions instead of traditional theories which focus on spatial analysis as distance, transportation cost, labour cost. Economic development has not been considered independently from space by these theories and it was emphasized importance of economic actors, institutional and economic infrastructure as well as geographic features for economic performance of a region. Space contributes to increase not only skilled workforce, knowledge spillover and distribution but also social relations and interaction. In other words, the social-cultural and humanity factors relating with geography are major factors affecting on the development and also growing of economic activities. Industrialization as engine of regional development has been benefiting from the advantages offered by spatial features, clustering of economic activities. In this context, clustering of economic activities has been one of the new areas of interest in economic geography. Therefore, it can be said that human-social-spatial resources within a region has had a major role in developing by essays of the new economic geography

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KARAKAYACI, Ö. (2022). Agglomerations, Human and Social Capital: The case of Manufacturing Industry in Konya-Turkey. ICONARP International Journal Of Architecture And Planning, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2, 216–233. https://ajindex.com/articles/538343

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Amin, A. (1999). An institutionalist perspective on regional economic development. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 23(2), 365-378.
  2. Asheim, B. T. (1996). Industrial districts as ‘learning regions’: A condition for prosperity. European Planning Studies, 4(4), 379-401.
  3. Belussi, F. (2006). In search of a useful theory of spatial clustering: agglomeration versus active clustering. In B. T. Asheim, P. Cooke, & R. Martin (Eds.), Clusters and regional development (pp. 69-89). UK: Routledge. Clercq, D. D., & Dakhli, M. (2003). Human capital, social capital, and innovation: A multi-country study. Gent: Vlerick Leuven Gent Management School. Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in and the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95-120.
  4. Crewe, L. (1996). Material culture: Embedded firms, organizational networks and the local economic development of a fashion quarter. Regional Studies, 30(3), 257-272.
  5. Devine, F., & Roberts, J. M. (2003). Alternative approaches to researching social capital: A comment on van Deth's measuring social capital. International journal of research methodology, 6, 93-100.
  6. Edwards, B., & Foley, M. (1999). Is it time to disinvest in social capital? Journal of Public Policy, 19(2), 141-173.
  7. Eser, K., & Gokmen, C. E. (2009). Beşeri sermaye’nin ekonomik gelişme üzerindeki etkileri: Dünya deneyimi ve Türkiye üzerine gözlemler. Sosyal ve Beşeri Bilimler Dergisi, 1(2), 1309-8012.
  8. Feser, E. J. (1998). Enterprises, external economies, and economic development. Journal of Planning Literature, 12(3), 283- 302. Field, J. (2006). Sosyal sermaye (B. Bilgen & B. Şen, Trans.). İstanbul: İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi.
  9. Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. London: Hamish Hamilton. Grootaert, C., & Bastelaer, V. T. (2002). The role of social capital in development: An empirical assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  10. Karagul, M., & Akcay, S. (2002). Ekonomik büyüme ve sosyal sermaye: Ampirik bir kanıt. İktisat İşletme ve Finans, 17(198), 82-90.
  11. Karakayacı, O. (2011). Role of social capital in success of industrial clusters: The case of mechanical engineering industry of Ankara and Konya. (PhD), Yildiz Technical University, İstanbul.
  12. Malmberg, A. (1996). Industrial geography: Agglomeration and local milieu. Progress in Human Geography, 20(3), 392- 403. Marshall, A. (1920). Principles of economics. London: MacMillan. Molina‐Morales, F. X. (2005). The territorial agglomerat