KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / ICONARP International Journal Of Architecture And Planning / 2018 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2

Determining a Strategy for Sustainable Development of Local Identity: Case of Birgi (İzmir/Turkey)

Kadriye DENİZ TOPÇU
Sayfa
371–398
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

In conclusion, it was found that“Entering to Slow City Movement” planning strategy is the mostappropriate and important strategy between prioritized planningstrategies for the sustainability of Birgi’s local identity.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Today, it is difficult to retain and strengthen local character in theglobalizing world.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:From this point, taking theadvantage of Birgi’s (Izmir/Turkey) having strong natural, man-madeand cultural identity, this study aims to find out the most appropriateplanning strategy for the sustainability of Birgi’s (İzmir-Turkey) localcharacter and identity which was selected as a case study.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:In conclusion, it was found that“Entering to Slow City Movement” planning strategy is the mostappropriate and important strategy between prioritized planningstrategies for the sustainability of Birgi’s local identity.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Today, it is difficult to retain and strengthen local character in theglobalizing world. Showing the advantages of small towns and tostrengthen their identities with focusing on ‘small realities in aglobalizing world’’ by increasing the value of local differences is animportant subject in the global atmosphere. From this point, taking theadvantage of Birgi’s (Izmir/Turkey) having strong natural, man-madeand cultural identity, this study aims to find out the most appropriateplanning strategy for the sustainability of Birgi’s (İzmir-Turkey) localcharacter and identity which was selected as a case study. This studymade some on-site observations for establishing the existing localidentity potentials of Birgi. After these observations, within the scope ofthe study, first of all, strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats(SWOT factors) of the settlement were identified. Additionally, todetermine the most appropriate planning strategy, a numerical SWOTanalysis called A’WOT analysis which is the combination of AnalyticalHierarchy Process (AHP) and SWOT analysis was used. Then, identifiedSWOT factors prioritized by an expert group (35 person) using A’WOTanalysis. After finding general and local priority values of SWOT factors,four planning strategies were displayed by using TOWS matrix. Then, themost appropriate strategy among these planning strategies was chosen according to their priority values. In conclusion, it was found that“Entering to Slow City Movement” planning strategy is the mostappropriate and important strategy between prioritized planningstrategies for the sustainability of Birgi’s local identity.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

TOPÇU, K. D. (2022). Determining a Strategy for Sustainable Development of Local Identity: Case of Birgi (İzmir/Turkey). ICONARP International Journal Of Architecture And Planning, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2, 371–398. https://ajindex.com/articles/538322

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (25)

  1. Abel, C. (1997).
  2. Architecture and Identity, Towards a Global Eco- Culture, Architectural Press.
  3. Altınoluk, Ü. (1997).
  4. Su Şehri Birgi, İlgi dergisi, sayı:89, sf. 3-7,
  5. İstanbul.
  6. Altınoluk, Ü. (1998).
  7. Selvi ve Birgi, İlgi dergisi, sf.14, İstanbul.
  8. Altınoluk, Ü. (2001). The Field Studies in Birgi: The Example of Industrial Archeology, Traditional Environments in a New Millennium, Amasya. Altınoluk, Ü. (2007).
  9. Geleneksel Kent Dokusu Birgi, Ege yayınları, İstanbul.
  10. Aly, S.S.A. (2011). Modernization and Regionalism: Approaches for Sustainable Revival of Local Urban Identity, Procedia Engineering 21, 503-512, Elsevier. Anonymous, (2001).
  11. Birgi, Kültür Bakanlığı yayınları, sf.3. Ankara.
  12. Appleyard, D. Jacobs, A. (1982).
  13. Toward an Urban Design Manifesto, IURD Working Paper 384., University of California, Berkeley. Ayan, M. (1985).
  14. Konut Alanları Tasarım İlkesi, Kent Koop. Yay. 52, Ankara.
  15. Bozoğlu, T. (1996). İzmir İlinde Bir Kültür Merkezi: Birgi, Arkitekt Dergisi, sayı 440, sf. 86-95.
  16. Clare, C. M. & Francis, C. (1997). People Places: Design Guidelines for Urban Open Space, Wiley; 2nd Edition.
  17. Deniz, K. (2004). Konya’da Farklı Üç Kentsel Mekanda Kent Kimliği Üzerine Bir Araştırma, Basılmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Selçuk Ünv., Fen Bilimleri Ens., Konya. Eruzun, C. (2000). Türkiye’de katılımcı korumaya bir örnek Birgi Yaz Okulu modeli, Tasarım+Kuram, sayı.2, sf.13-26.
  18. Featherstone, M. (1993).
  19. Global and Local Cultures, Mapping the Futures: Local Cultures, Global Change (eds. John Bird et al.), 169–87. London: Routledge. Gençsoylu, Z. (2009). 17 ve 18. Yüzyıllarda Birgi Kazası, Adnan Menderes Ünv., Sosyal Bilimler Ens., Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Aydın. Hough, M. (1990).
  20. Out of Place, Yale Unv. Pres. Kajanus, M. Kangas, J. and Kurttila, M. (2004). The Use of Value Focused Thinking and A’WOT Hybrid Method in Tourism Management, Tourism Management, Volume: 25, pp: 499- 506. Kangas, J. Pesonen, M. Kurttila, M. & Kajanus, M. (2001). A’WOT: Integrating the AHP with SWOT Analysis, ISAHP 2001,
  21. Berne, Switzerland, pp. 189-198.
  22. Keskin, E. B. (2012). Sürdürülebilir Kent Kavramına Farklı Bir Bakış: Yavaş Şehirler (Cittaslow), Paradoks Ekonomi, Sosyoloji ve Politika Dergisi, cilt: 8, sayı: 1, 81-99.
  23. Knox, P.L. (2005). Creating Ordinary Places: Slow Cities in a Fast World, Journal of Urban Design, vol.10, no.1, pp. 1-11,
  24. Routledge. Kotler, P. and Gertner, D. (2002).
  25. Country as a Brand, Product and Beyond: A Place Marketing and Brand Management Perspective, Journal of Brand Management, vol. 9