Dergiler / ICONARP International Journal Of Architecture And Planning / 2019 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: Özel Sayı

Roots of Urban Morphology

Sayfa
15–36
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

As the formation and development of the urbanlandscape becomes ever more diverse, it is necessary to revisit and use the concepts and methods established by Caniggia and Conzen in themanagement of urban landscape changes.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This paper provides a comprehensive review of the research field ofurban morphology: the study of urban form.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Urban morphology is agrowing field of cross-disciplinary research, attracting worldwideinterest among scholars in architecture, geography and planning.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:As the formation and development of the urbanlandscape becomes ever more diverse, it is necessary to revisit and use the concepts and methods established by Caniggia and Conzen in themanagement of urban landscape changes.
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

This paper provides a comprehensive review of the research field ofurban morphology: the study of urban form. Urban morphology is agrowing field of cross-disciplinary research, attracting worldwideinterest among scholars in architecture, geography and planning. It aimsto decipher the physical form, the urban landscape or townscape ofcomplex contemporary cities. This paper discusses the evolution ofurban morphology, from its conceptual foundations in research on thephysical form of urban areas. Interestingly, the roots of urbanmorphology can be traced back to different disciplines in differentcountries. This discussion will cast light on various researchperspectives of urban morphology, as well as discussing similarities anddifferences between the geographical and the architectural approachesto urban form studies. This is followed by a closer look at the theoriesdeveloped by Gianfranco Caniggia and MRG Conzen. Their work has beenan inspiration for many practitioners and researchers, includingWhitehand, Maffei, and Moudon to name a few. Finally, a schematicdiagram is presented, which reflects the heightened activity of researchon physical form that is currently occurring in several disciplinessimultaneously, and showing the relationships between researchtraditions and authors. As the formation and development of the urbanlandscape becomes ever more diverse, it is necessary to revisit and use the concepts and methods established by Caniggia and Conzen in themanagement of urban landscape changes.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KRİSTİANSDOTTİR, S. (2022). Roots of Urban Morphology. ICONARP International Journal Of Architecture And Planning, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: Özel Sayı, 15–36. https://ajindex.com/articles/538310

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (7)

  1. Alexander, C., S. Ishikawa, and M. Silverstein, with M. Jacobson & S.A Fiksdahl-King (1977). A Pattern Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  2. Aymonino, C.M., Brusatin, M., Fabbri, G., Lena, M., Loverro, P., Lucianetti, S., & Rossi, A. (1966). La Citta di Padova, saggio di analisi urbana. Roma: Offician edizoni. Caniggia, G. (1963). Lettura di una Citta: Como. Rome: Centro Studi di Storia Urbanistica. Caniggia, G. (1997).
  3. Ragionamenti di tipologia, Operativita della tipologia processuale in architettura. (English translation by Nicola Marzot) Firenze: ALINEA. Caniggia, G. & Maffei, G.L. (1979). Composizione Architettonica e Tipologia Ediliza: 1. Lettura dell’Edilizia di Base Venezia: Marsilio. Caniggia, G. & Maffei, G.L. (1984). Composizione Architettonica e Tipologia Ediliza: 2. Il Progetto nell’Edilizia di Base. Venezia: Marsilio. Caniggia, G. & Maffei, G.L. (2001). Composizione architettonica e tipologia edilizia. Lettura dell’edilizia di base. (English translation by Susan Jane Fraser) Firenze: ALINEA. Castex, J. (2013). The City as the Only Model. A Critical Study a Century after Muratori´s Birth. In Cataldi, G. (ed.) Saverio Muratori Architetto (Modern 1910 – Roma 1973) a centro anni dalla nascita. Firenze: Aión Edizioni. Cataldi, G. (ed.) (2013). Saverio Muratori Architetto (Modern 1910 – Roma 1973) a centro anni dalla nascita. Firenze: Aión Edizioni. Cataldi, G. (1998). Designing in stages: theory and design in the typological concept of the Italian school of Saverio Muratori. In Petruccioli, A. (ed), Typological Process and Design Theory, pp. 35-54. Aga Khan Program for Islamic Architecture at Harvard University and Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Cataldi, G. (2003). From Muratori to Caniggia: the origins and development of the Italian school of design typology. Urban Morphology, 7, 19-34.
  4. Cataldi, G. (2015).
  5. Abitazioni Primitive, Il processo evolutivo dei tipi edilizi nel mondo. Primitive Dwellings, The evolutionary process of building types in the world. Firenze: Aión Edizioni. Cataldi, G., Maffei, G.L., & Vaccaro P. (2002). Saverio Muratori and the Italian school of planning typology. Urban Morphology, 6, 3-14.
  6. Conzen, M.R.G. (1960).
  7. Alnwick, Northumberland: a study in townplan analysis (Institute of British Geographers Publication 27). London: Georg Philip. Conzen, M. R. G. (1962). The plan analysis of an English city centre. In K. Norborg (ed.), Proceedings of the IGU Symposium in Urban Geography, Lund 1960. Lund: Gleerup. Conzen, M