Dergiler / ICONARP International Journal Of Architecture And Planning / 2019 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: Özel Sayı

Introducing Supergrids, Superblocks, Areas, Networks, and Levels to Urban Morphological Analyses

Sayfa
1–14
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

It introduces a conceptualframework for a multilevel structure of urban space using areas andnetworks and including supergrids and superblocks to guidemorphological analyses.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Urban morphological analyses have identified the parcel (plot), thebuilding type, or the plan unit (tessuto in Italian) as the basic elementsof urban form.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:As cities have grown in geographic sizedisproportionately to their growth in population over the past sevendecades, new elements have been introduced that structure their form.This essay describes these new elements and proposes that they beformally recognized in urban morphology.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:It introduces a conceptualframework for a multilevel structure of urban space using areas andnetworks and including supergrids and superblocks to guidemorphological analyses.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Urban morphological analyses have identified the parcel (plot), thebuilding type, or the plan unit (tessuto in Italian) as the basic elementsof urban form. As cities have grown in geographic sizedisproportionately to their growth in population over the past sevendecades, new elements have been introduced that structure their form.This essay describes these new elements and proposes that they beformally recognized in urban morphology. It introduces a conceptualframework for a multilevel structure of urban space using areas andnetworks and including supergrids and superblocks to guidemorphological analyses.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

MOUDON, A. V. (2022). Introducing Supergrids, Superblocks, Areas, Networks, and Levels to Urban Morphological Analyses. ICONARP International Journal Of Architecture And Planning, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: Özel Sayı, 1–14. https://ajindex.com/articles/538300

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (10)

  1. Berke, E.M., & Vernez-Moudon, A. (2014) Built environment change: A framework to support health-enhancing behaviour through environmental policy and health research. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 68(6), 586-590.
  2. Chen, X. (2017). A comparative study of supergrid and superblock urban structure in China and Japan, Rethinking the Chinese superblocks: Learning from Japanese experience. Doctor of Philosophy thesis, Faculty of Architecture, Design & Planning, The University of Sydney, Australia, http://hdl.handle.net/2123/17986
  3. Chow, R.Y. (2002). Suburban Space: The Fabric of Dwelling. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
  4. Duany, A., & Plater-Zyberk, E. (1991) Towns and town-making principles. New York: Rizzoli Dupuy, G. (1991). L'Urbanisme des réseaux: théories et méthodes. Paris: Armand Colin. Handy, S. (2002). Accessibility- vs. mobility-enhancing strategies for addressing automobile dependence in the U.S. Paper prepared for the European Conference of Ministers of Transport, May, http://www.des.ucdavis.edu/faculty/han dy/ECMT_report.pdf Hartshorn, T.R. (1980) Interpreting the city: An urban geography. New York: John Wiley & Sons Lu, D. (2006). Remaking Chinese urban form: Modernity, scarcity and space, 1949-2005. London: Routledge. Moudon, A.V. (1986a). Built for change: Neighborhood architecture in San Francisco. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  5. Moudon, A.V. (1986b). Platting versus planning: Housing at the household scale. Landscape 29, 30-38.
  6. Moudon, A.V. (1997) Urban morphology as an emerging interdisciplinary field. Urban Morphology. 1, 3-10 http://www.urbanform.org/pdf/moudon1997.pdf
  7. Moudon, A.V. (2002). Thinking about micro and macro urban morphology. Urban Morphology. 6(1), 37-39.
  8. Panerai, Ph., Castex, J., Depaule, J.C., (1977). Formes urbaines, de l’îlot à la barre. Paris: Éditions Parenthèses. Panerai, Ph., Depaule, J.C., & Demorgon, M. (1999). Analyse urbaine. Paris: Collection Eupalinos. Peponis, J., Park, J., & Feng, C. (2016) The city as interface of scales: Gangnam Urbanism. In S. H. Kim, E. Cinn, K. Ahn, S. Kim, I. Chung, D. E. Jeong, & R. Enos. (Eds.), The FAR game. Seoul, Korea: SPACE Books, 102–111.
  9. Perry, C. (1929). Neighborhood and community planning comprising three monographs: The Neighborhood Unit. New York, Regional Plan of New York and Its Environs. Sarraf, M. (2010).
  10. Vestiges of urban spirit, Isfahan’s urban fabric through socio-spatial transformations. Licentiate Thesis. KTH, Royal Institute of Technology, Scho