Dergiler / ICONARP International Journal Of Architecture And Planning / 2019 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2

Policy Recommendations for the Planning of Multi- Level Redevelopment and Social Housing Practices

Sayfa
540–567
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

This study argues that whether focused onrenewal, regeneration, transformation, slum removal, or earthquakepreparedness, redevelopment activities should pursue planning policiesat both the general and local levels when designing a project and takeinto consideration the affected community’s inclusion and wellbeing incorresponding policies, including those of social housing.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Considering the urgent need for intervention in areas affected byproblems such as gecekondu settlement and earthquake risk,redevelopment is inevitable in Istanbul.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The study aims to fill this gap through areview of these practices, a close examination of the hands-onredevelopment experience, and the lessons derived from two pioneeringredevelopment projects in Istanbul: the gecekondu renewal of Ayazma-Tepeüstü and the earthquake-based regeneration in Sümer. 26 in-depthinterviews were carried out with actors who influenced redevelopmentdecisions and those who were influenced by them.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:This study argues that whether focused onrenewal, regeneration, transformation, slum removal, or earthquakepreparedness, redevelopment activities should pursue planning policiesat both the general and local levels when designing a project and takeinto consideration the affected community’s inclusion and wellbeing incorresponding policies, including those of social housing.
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Considering the urgent need for intervention in areas affected byproblems such as gecekondu settlement and earthquake risk,redevelopment is inevitable in Istanbul. Such interventions, however,have proven problematic in meeting the local community’s needs. Thereis a gap between the Istanbul experience and Western—in particularWestern European—redevelopment practices, after which the Turkishexperience has been modelled. The study aims to fill this gap through areview of these practices, a close examination of the hands-onredevelopment experience, and the lessons derived from two pioneeringredevelopment projects in Istanbul: the gecekondu renewal of Ayazma-Tepeüstü and the earthquake-based regeneration in Sümer. 26 in-depthinterviews were carried out with actors who influenced redevelopmentdecisions and those who were influenced by them. Data triangulationwas employed to compare the two cases and reveal conflicting opinionsand claims. Based on insights from informed practitioners (i.e. centralgovernment and metropolitan-level housing providers, localmunicipalities, and NGOs) and residents, the article analyzes thephysical, financial, and community aspects of local redevelopment projects. It then derives policy sets for the planning of multi-levelredevelopment and social housing practices as suggested by the projectpractitioners and community. This study argues that whether focused onrenewal, regeneration, transformation, slum removal, or earthquakepreparedness, redevelopment activities should pursue planning policiesat both the general and local levels when designing a project and takeinto consideration the affected community’s inclusion and wellbeing incorresponding policies, including those of social housing.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

WAİTE, İ. A. (2022). Policy Recommendations for the Planning of Multi- Level Redevelopment and Social Housing Practices. ICONARP International Journal Of Architecture And Planning, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2, 540–567. https://ajindex.com/articles/538292

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (9)

  1. Aksoy, A. (2012). Riding the storm: ‘new Istanbul.’ City: analysis of urban trends, culture, theory, policy, action, 16(1-2), 93- 111. Bakçay-Çolak, E. (2012). Istanbul, a rebelling city under construction, Housing in Europe: Time to evict the crisis, 7, 34-40.
  2. Balaban, M. Ş. (2019). Hazard-prone cities and recent challenges in the case of urban transformation experience of Turkey. In Ö. B. Özdemir Sarı, S. Özdemir & N. Uzun (Eds.), Urban and regional planning in Turkey (pp. 235-259).
  3. Springer, Cham. Bartu-Candan, A., & Kolluoğlu, B. (2008). Emerging spaces of neoliberalism: A gated town and a public housing project in Istanbul, New perspectives on Turkey, 39, 5-46.
  4. Couch, C. (1990). Urban renewal theory and practice. Basingstroke, UK: MacMillan. DETR (Department of Environment, Transport and the Regions). (2000). Our towns and cities–the future: Delivering an urban Renaissance. London: DETR/Stationery Office. DOE (Department of Environment). (1997). Planning policy guidance: General policy and principles (Report No. PPG1). London: DOE/Stationery Office. Ecumenopolis. (2012). Ecumenopolis: City without limits. Documentary written and directed by İmre Azem. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=maE cPKBXV0M. Egercioğlu, Y., & Özdemir, S. (2007). Changing dynamics of urban transformation process in Turkey: Izmir and Ankara cases. In Proceedings of the 47th International congress of the European Regional Science Association, Paris, France, 29 August-2 September, 1, 254-256.
  5. Erdik, M., & Durukal, E. (2008). Earthquake risks and its mitigation in Istanbul, Natural Hazards, 44(2), 181-197.
  6. Ersoy, M. (2001). Democratization through de-centralization? The Turkish case. Paper presented in the 1st World Planning Schools Congress, Shanghai, China, July. Evans, G. (2005). Measure for measure: Evaluating the evidence of culture’s contribution to regeneration, Urban Studies, 42(5), 959-983.
  7. Ezme, A. T. (2017). A Reading of Gecekondu as a Tool of Rapid Urbanization and Cheap Economic Development. In S. Çelik, O. Küçükahmetoğlu & J. Dobreva (Eds.), Contemporary Studies in Social, Economic & Financial Analysis (pp. 63-86). London: IJOPEC Publication Limited. Gordon, C. (2003). Blighting the way: Urban renewal, economic development, and the elusive definition of blight. Fordham Urban Law Journal, 31, 305-337.
  8. Gül, H., & Dulupçu, M. A. (2010).
  9. Local Economic Development, Urban Change and Regeneration in Turkey: Possibilities for Transcending Beyond Modernism. In J.