KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / ICONARP International Journal Of Architecture And Planning / 2019 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: Özel Sayı

An Interstitial Reading of Istanbul

Fatma Pelin EKDİ
Mahyar AREFİ
Sayfa
182–211
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Reading theseintricate layers of Istanbul’s ‘closed’ and ‘open’ city (Sennett, 2017) inclose proximity to a main transportation artery (D 100 highway) againstthe broader backdrop of its long history intertwined with geographicand socioeconomic push and pull forces provides a comprehensive toolfor adopting similar methods for reading other cities.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:As palimpsests of multiple layers of historic, geo-political, and socioeconomic complexity, contemporary cities demand innovative methodsof deciphering and unraveling their development.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Typically referred toas reading the city, these methods of delayering and synthesizing urbancomplexity have, for long, pre-occupied urban planners anddecisionmakers.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Reading theseintricate layers of Istanbul’s ‘closed’ and ‘open’ city (Sennett, 2017) inclose proximity to a main transportation artery (D 100 highway) againstthe broader backdrop of its long history intertwined with geographicand socioeconomic push and pull forces provides a comprehensive toolfor adopting similar methods for reading other cities.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:2017 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

As palimpsests of multiple layers of historic, geo-political, and socioeconomic complexity, contemporary cities demand innovative methodsof deciphering and unraveling their development. Typically referred toas reading the city, these methods of delayering and synthesizing urbancomplexity have, for long, pre-occupied urban planners anddecisionmakers. Drawing from its interdisciplinary literature, this paperexplores a comprehensive model of reading the city. Using a qualitativeapproach from both the archival and visual data sources, this studyprovides a better understanding of complex layers of urbanism thatguide urban planners, policy makers and decisionmakers in developingmore convenient solutions to urban problems. With multiple layers of itsurbanism, Istanbul makes a suitable case study for this purpose.Identifying three types of developments (controlled or top-down,partially controlled and outlawed, bottom-up), different interactivenetworks provide sufficient grounds for reading Istanbul. Reading theseintricate layers of Istanbul’s ‘closed’ and ‘open’ city (Sennett, 2017) inclose proximity to a main transportation artery (D 100 highway) againstthe broader backdrop of its long history intertwined with geographicand socioeconomic push and pull forces provides a comprehensive toolfor adopting similar methods for reading other cities.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

EKDİ, F. P., AREFİ, M. (2022). An Interstitial Reading of Istanbul. ICONARP International Journal Of Architecture And Planning, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: Özel Sayı, 182–211. https://ajindex.com/articles/538289

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (2)

  1. Akbulut M R, Başlık S, 2011, “Transformation of Perception of The Gecekondu Phenomenon” Metu Journal of Faculty of Architecture 28 (2) 1-44
  2. Akgün A A, Baycan T, 2012, “Gated communities in Istanbul: the new walls of the city” TPR 83 (1) 87-109 Akin N, 1998 19. Yuzyilin Ikinci Yarisinda Galata ve Pera (Istanbul Literatur) [Galata nad Pera in the Second Half of the 19 th Century] Aksoy A, Robins K, 1996, “Istanbul between civilization and discontent” City 5 (6) 6–33 Aksoy A, 2012, “Riding the storm: ‘new Istanbul’” City: analysis of urban trends, culture, theory, policy, action, 16 (1-2) 93- 111 Alexander C, Ishikawa S, Silverstein M, Jacobson M, Fiksdahl-King I, Angel S, 1977. A pattern language: Towns, Buildings, Construction (Oxford University Press, New York) Alpkokin P, Ergun M, 2012, “Istanbul Metrobüs: first intercontinental bus rapid transit” Journal of Transport Geography 24 58–66 Arefi M, 1999, “Crisis of local identity in a metropolitan area under neoliberal influences” Journal of Urban Design, 4(2) 175- 194 Arefi M, 2004, “The pedagogy of the American city: revisiting the concepts of place, non-place, and placelessness” URBAN DESIGN International 9 103–117 Arefi M, 2011, Order in Informal Settlements: A Case Study of Pinar, Istanbul,” Built Environment, 37 (1): 42-56. Arefi M, 2013. “The structure of visual difference: A comparative case study of Mariemont and Lebanon, Ohio” URBAN DESIGN International 1-17 Auge M, 1995 Non-Places: Introduction to an Anthropology of Supermodernity (New York, Verso). Ayataç H, 2007, “The International Diffusion of Planning Ideas: The Case of Istanbul, Turkey” Journal of Planning History, 6 114 – 137 Aysan M, Demir O, Altan Z, Dökmeci V, 1997, “Industrial Decentralization in Istanbul & its Impact on Transport” Journal of Urban Planning & Development 123 (3) Baharoglu D, Leitmann J, 1998, “Coping Strategies for Infrastructure: How Turkey's Spontaneous Settlements Operate in the Absence of Formal Rules” HABITATITNL 22 (2) 115-135 Banerjee T and Verma N, 2005, “Sprawl and Segregation: Another Side of the Los Angeles Debate”, in Desegregating the City Ed. D Varady (State University of New York Press), pp 200 – 212. Banham R, 1971 Los Angeles: The Architecture of Four Ecologies (Harper and Row, New York) Barnett J, 1995 The Fractured Metropolis: Improving The New City, Restoring The Old City, Reshaping The Region (HarperCollins, New York) Bilsel C, 2011 “Les Transformations d’Istanbul”: Henri Prost’s planning of Istanbul