Dergiler / ICONARP International Journal Of Architecture And Planning / 2020 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2

Assessment of The Rural Economic Structure of Güdül Town (Ankara) by Quantified Swot Analysis

Sayfa
672–702
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Various strategies supporting the rural development and also institutions responsible for the implementation of these strategies were designated in light of the needs of Güdül and the expectations of the local people living in rural areas.Research Limitations/ImplicationsThe version of the questionnaire forms compatible with the SWOT-AHP technique, the scarcity of local manager surveys, the lack of answers to the questions of the local people are among the main difficulties encountered.Originality/ValueThis study is quite original in that it is the first strategic rural development plan model made specifically for Güdül, related to the participation of indigenous people in planning initiatives and transparently reflects the sometimes combined and sometimes changing views of local people, experts and local administrators about the importance of SWOT groups has a quality.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:PurposeRather than solely having agricultural production at its core, rural development comprises of a multiaxial structure in which the socio-economic structure develops, non-agricultural economic diversification is assured, and a governance-based approached is adopted in the organization and participation mechanisms.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The applicability and consistency of these intertwined axes entail an integrated approach to efforts in rural development.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Various strategies supporting the rural development and also institutions responsible for the implementation of these strategies were designated in light of the needs of Güdül and the expectations of the local people living in rural areas.Research Limitations/ImplicationsThe version of the questionnaire forms compatible with the SWOT-AHP technique, the scarcity of local manager surveys, the lack of answers to the questions of the local people are among the main difficulties encountered.Originality/ValueThis study is quite original in that it is the first strategic rural development plan model made specifically for Güdül, related to the participation of indigenous people in planning initiatives and transparently reflects the sometimes combined and sometimes changing views of local people, experts and local administrators about the importance of SWOT groups has a quality.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

PurposeRather than solely having agricultural production at its core, rural development comprises of a multiaxial structure in which the socio-economic structure develops, non-agricultural economic diversification is assured, and a governance-based approached is adopted in the organization and participation mechanisms. The applicability and consistency of these intertwined axes entail an integrated approach to efforts in rural development. With the purpose of uncovering the critical points of the process, creating strategies intended for rural economic development within the axes valued by different stakeholders, and strengthening the participation mechanisms, SWOT Analysis, Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) integrated method, and TOWS matrix have been used to identify the Güdül rural economic development model. Design/Methodology/ApproachIn this study, the hierarchical structure established for the economic structure of Güdül is placed on the foundations of a SWOT analysis, quantified through Analytic Hierarchy Process, and evaluated within the framework of the three stakeholder’s perceptions (local people, experts, and local governments) according to their priority values.FindingsThus, the extent of the respective effects of important factors in rural economic development has been identified. In conclusion, the decisive role of quantified methods in the identification of strategies and policies utilized in the process of Güdül’s rural economic development has been manifested. Various strategies supporting the rural development and also institutions responsible for the implementation of these strategies were designated in light of the needs of Güdül and the expectations of the local people living in rural areas.Research Limitations/ImplicationsThe version of the questionnaire forms compatible with the SWOT-AHP technique, the scarcity of local manager surveys, the lack of answers to the questions of the local people are among the main difficulties encountered.Originality/ValueThis study is quite original in that it is the first strategic rural development plan model made specifically for Güdül, related to the participation of indigenous people in planning initiatives and transparently reflects the sometimes combined and sometimes changing views of local people, experts and local administrators about the importance of SWOT groups has a quality.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Gündüz, E., Dereyurt, B. Ş. (2022). Assessment of The Rural Economic Structure of Güdül Town (Ankara) by Quantified Swot Analysis. ICONARP International Journal Of Architecture And Planning, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2, 672–702. https://ajindex.com/articles/538273

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (9)

  1. Akbulak, C. (2016). Ardahan ilinde kırsal turizm potansiyelinin sayısallaştırılmış SWOT analizi ile değerlendirilmesi. doi:10.20304/husbd.86882 Aksoy, H. H., & Elmacı, D. (2009). Örneklem seçimi ve hesaplaması Retrieved from 80.251.40.59/education.ankara.edu.tr/aksoy/eay/eay/b0506/delmaci.doc. Retrieved 19 Temmuz 2019 80.251.40.59/education.ankara.edu.tr/aksoy/eay/eay/b0506/delmaci.doc Anonymous. (2017). Güdül district research report. Retrieved from Ankara: Anonymous. (2019a, 17 Temmuz 2019). Gudul investigation of development aspects. Retrieved from https://www.ankaraka.org.tr/tr/arama?q=g%C3%BCd%C3%BCl Anonymous. (2019b). Gudul technical infrastructure. Retrieved from https://gudul.bel.tr/
  2. Baycan Levent, T., Gülümser, A. A., & Nıjkamp, P. (2010). Türkiye’nin kırsal yapısı: AB düzeyinde bir karşılaştırma. İtü Dergisi/a, 9(2), 133-144.
  3. Cengiz, T., & Çelem, H. (2005). Hızlı kırsal değerlendirme yöntemi: Alpağut köyü örneği (Seben, Bolu). Kafkas Üniversitesi Artvin Orman Fakültesi Dergisi, 6(1-2), 161-170.
  4. Champion, T., & Hugo, G. (2004). New forms of urbanization: beyond the urbanrural dichotomy. Aldershot: Ashgate. Çelik, N., & Murat, G. (2008). Sayısallaştırılmış SWOT analizi ile Bartın ilinin ekonomik yapısını değerlendirme Paper presented at the 2. Ulusal İktisat Kongresi, İzmir.
  5. Geray, C. (2011). Dünden bugüne kırsal gelişme politikaları. Ankara.
  6. Gülçubuk, B. (2015). Dünya’da Avrupa Birliği’nde ve Türkiye’de kırsal kalkınma yaklaşımlarında değişimler Retrieved from https://acikders.ankara.edu.tr/mod/resource/view.php?id=8616Retrieved 12 Haziran 2019, from Ankara Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Tarım Ekonomisi Bölümü https://acikders.ankara.edu.tr/mod/resource/view.php?id=8616
  7. Ilbery, B. W. (1998). The geography of rural change. London.Kangas, J., Kurtilla, M., & Kajanus, M. (2003). Evaluating the management strategies of a forestland estate - the S–O–S approach. Journal of Environmental Management, 69, 349-358.
  8. Kaplan, H. (2007). Kentsel sit alanı bulunan Anadolu kasabalarında turizm seçeneği olarak eko turizm – Güdül örneği.(Uzmanlık Tezi). Gazi Üniversitesi, Ankara. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/302460439_KENTSEL_SIT_ALANI_BULUNAN_ANADOLU_KASABALARINDA_TURIZM_SECENEGI_OLARAK_EKO_TURIZM_-_GUDUL_ORNEGI_-_ECO_TOURISM_AS_A_TOURIST_DEVELOPMENT_ALTENATIVE_FOR_ANATOLIAN_SMALL_TOWNS_WITH_A_CONSERVATION_AREA-_G
  9. Kurtilla, M., Pesonen, M., Kangas, J., & Kajanus, M. (2000). Utilizing the analytic hierarchy process AHP in SWOT analysis –