KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / ICONARP International Journal Of Architecture And Planning / 2020 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2

A Review of Modernization: The Giresun Government House and Administrative Center

Özgür Demirkan
Selin Karaibrahimoğlu
Sayfa
431–460
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

This study is unique with contribution tostudies related to a city that hasnot been placed in manyurban, architectural, and historical studies and with its potential to increase sensitivity to periodical buildings in the city as one of the parts that complement the city's culture and identity.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:PurposeThe purpose of the study is to discuss the Government houses erected in the latter Ottoman period, and the administrative centers erected in time by other public buildings located around over the changes they made to the urban space and in particular over the Giresun province periodical as a necessity and symbol of administrative modernization.Design/Methodology/ApproachGiresun's modernization experience on the periphery was conducted by a periodic reading.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The Late Ottoman Period is defined as the ‘First Steps of Modernization (the end of the 19th century)’; the first years of the Republic as the ‘Fundamental Modernization (the early 20th century)’; today is defined as ‘New Searches / Tendencies in Modernization (late 20th-21st century)’.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:This study is unique with contribution tostudies related to a city that hasnot been placed in manyurban, architectural, and historical studies and with its potential to increase sensitivity to periodical buildings in the city as one of the parts that complement the city's culture and identity.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of the study is to discuss the Government houses erected in the latter Ottoman period, and the administrative centers erected in time by other public buildings located around over the changes they made to the urban space and in particular over the Giresun province periodical as a necessity and symbol of administrative modernization.Design/Methodology/ApproachGiresun's modernization experience on the periphery was conducted by a periodic reading. The Late Ottoman Period is defined as the ‘First Steps of Modernization (the end of the 19th century)’; the first years of the Republic as the ‘Fundamental Modernization (the early 20th century)’; today is defined as ‘New Searches / Tendencies in Modernization (late 20th-21st century)’. The method of the study was determined by the collection of verbal, written, and visual data Type the design/methodology/approach of the paper here.FindingsBuildings that were built, demolished, or changed their function in each period in the context of their ownhistoricalconditions,arepartofthecity'smodernizationprocess. Accordingly,theadministrative center, which was erected during the Ottoman period, continued its functional and symbolic meaning for many years, but has recently started to lose this feature and its structural quality and meaning.Research Limitations/ImplicationsGiresun is placed in the center of the study as a township in the Trabzon province in the late Ottoman period, and as a small port city in the Republican Age. The study focuses on the period from the late period of the Ottoman period to the present.Originality/Value Today, the building, which has begun to lose its effect, despite its urban, architectural, and symbolic value, should be evaluated in a way that respects the public interest and should continue to preserve its rightful value as an important part of the urban memory. This study is unique with contribution tostudies related to a city that hasnot been placed in manyurban, architectural, and historical studies and with its potential to increase sensitivity to periodical buildings in the city as one of the parts that complement the city's culture and identity.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Demirkan, Ö., Karaibrahimoğlu, S. (2022). A Review of Modernization: The Giresun Government House and Administrative Center. ICONARP International Journal Of Architecture And Planning, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2, 431–460. https://ajindex.com/articles/538266

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (21)

  1. Anonymous (1933). Cumhuriyet’in on yılında Giresun (1923-1933).Giresun Ticaret ve Sanayi Odası, Işık Publisher.
  2. Anonymous (1973). Cumhuriyetin 50. yılında Giresun. Giresun İl Yıllığı,Governorship of Giresun Publications. Aslanoğlu, İ., İdil, B., İnan, U., Karaaslan, M., Ortaylı, İ., Özbek, N., Yatman, A. (1984). Osmanlı’dan bugüne hükûmet konakları (Causerie) Güven Birkan (Chair), Mimarlık, 203 (5), 3-5.
  3. Avcı, Y. (2017). Osmanlı hüküme t konakları. Türk Tarih Vakfı Yayınları.
  4. Balcı, S. (2012). Giresun Rumları ve Gayrimüslim bir belediye başkanı. Libra Publications. Bekdemir, Ü. (2015).
  5. İmar Çalışmaları, Ulaşım, Afetler ve Çevre Sorunları. In Bekdemir, Ü. and Fatsa, M. (Eds.). Geçmişten günümüze Giresun, Giresun İl Özel İdaresi Kültür Serisi.4 (pp. 250-278).
  6. Mavi Ofset Publisher.
  7. Çadırcı, M. (1997). Tanzimat döneminde Anadolu kentlerinin sosyal ve ekonomik yapısı. Türk Tarih Kurumu Publications. Çelik, Z. (2012).
  8. İmparatorluk, Mimari ve Kent, Garanti Kültür Publications. Çetin, S. (2012). Geç Osmanlıdan Erken Cumhuriyete İç Batı Anadolu’da kentsel yapının değişimi: Manisa, Afyon, Burdur ve Isparta kentleri üzerine karşılaştırmalı bir inceleme, METU JFA 29(2), 89-126.
  9. Düzenli, H.İ. and Taşar, E.S. (2012). Mardin’de Tarih, Bina ve Mimarlık Katmanları:19. yy. Hükümet Konağından 21. yy. Mimarlık Fakültesine Dönüşümün Hikayesi, Arredamento Mimarlık, 2012(2), 64-78.
  10. Ersoy, A. (2009). Melezliğe Övgü; Tanzimat Dönemi Osmanlı Kimlik Politikaları ve Mimarlık, Toplumsal Tarih (189), 62-67.
  11. Emecen, F. (1997).
  12. Giresun tarihinin bazı meseleleri, In Giresun Historical SymposiumProceedings Book (pp.19-24).
  13. Önder Publications. Fatsa, M. and Sarıtaş, H.İ. (2012). Giresun merkezde Osmanlı Devri Vakıf Eser Kitabeleri, Vakıflar Dergisi, 38, 141-155.
  14. Göle, N. (2000). Melez Desenler. Metis Publisher.
  15. Hanioğlu, M.Ş. (2016).
  16. Modern Osmanlı Dönemi, In Heper, M. and Sayarı, S. (Eds.). Dünden bugüne Türkiye tarih, politika, toplum ve kültür, (pp. 17-26). Bilgi University Publications. Mardin, Ş. (1999). Türk modernleşmesi. İletişim Publisher.
  17. Işık, A. and Dervişoğlu, T., (2011). Ey Gidi Giresun. Özyurt Publisher.
  18. İltar, G. (2014).
  19. Giresun Kültür Envanteri, Giresun Valiliği Yayınları,
  20. Dönence Publications. İnalcık, H. (1962). Sened-i İttifak ve Gülhane Hatt-ı Hümayunu, Türk Tarih Kurumu; Belleten Dergisi, 112, 603-622.
  21. İnsel, A. (2001), Modern Türkiye’de siyasi düşünce, Kemalizm.İletişim Publications. Kabacaoğlu, G. and Dervişoğlu, T. (2019). Giresun Belediyesi ve Belediye Başkanları 1