Dergiler / ICONARP International Journal Of Architecture And Planning / 2020 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3

“Inherited Gentrification”: Changing Profiles ofGentrifiers via Inheritance, The Case of Bozcaada

Sayfa
143–168
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

However, the case examined provides a basis for future work that may validate its findings in different contexts.Originality/ValueThispapercontributestotheruralgentrificationliteraturebyintroducinganewtypeofgentrification process, the ‘inherited gentrification’ with the identification of the second-generation gentrifiers of the island, who are the direct descendants of the first gentrifiers.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:PurposeRural areas have been through structural changes.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Differently, the second-generation newcomers have shown diversity in terms ofbothmotivationandsocio-economicclass.Thisstudyarguesthatthesecond-generation newcomers took part naturally in the gentrification process not because they inherited their parents’ properties, but also they play an important role in the significant socio-economic and cultural changes that are still taking place on the island.Research Limitations/Implications The fact that the research is based on a single case study is a limitation for its generalisation.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:However, the case examined provides a basis for future work that may validate its findings in different contexts.Originality/ValueThispapercontributestotheruralgentrificationliteraturebyintroducinganewtypeofgentrification process, the ‘inherited gentrification’ with the identification of the second-generation gentrifiers of the island, who are the direct descendants of the first gentrifiers.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

PurposeRural areas have been through structural changes. The reorganisation of the rural economy from agriculturetoservices,inadditiontoimprovementsintransportationandinfrastructures,migration patterns have started to reverse in some regions and hence to change the social composition of those regions’ rural areas. These changes and their implications have been largely debated in the rural gentrification literature, mainly by re-presenting cases from the Anglo-Saxon world. This paper contributes to the rural gentrification literature by presenting an empirical study on a socio-cultural and demographic change that, together with a local economic shift, is taking place in a location other than the Global North.Design/Methodology/Approach A qualitative case study examining the changes on the socio-spatial structure of a small Turkish island,Bozcaada,ispresentedthroughthefollowingprincipalindicatorsofcountrysidegentrification: the change in the socio-economic composition of its citizens; the emphasis on cultural or national heritage and aesthetics; the emergence of new institutions leading to the closure of older ones; the diversification of products and services; and the change in properties’ value.FindingsThefirst-generationnewcomerswereinlinewiththetypicalgentrifier’sprofileofruralgentrification studies. Differently, the second-generation newcomers have shown diversity in terms ofbothmotivationandsocio-economicclass.Thisstudyarguesthatthesecond-generation newcomers took part naturally in the gentrification process not because they inherited their parents’ properties, but also they play an important role in the significant socio-economic and cultural changes that are still taking place on the island.Research Limitations/Implications The fact that the research is based on a single case study is a limitation for its generalisation. However, the case examined provides a basis for future work that may validate its findings in different contexts.Originality/ValueThispapercontributestotheruralgentrificationliteraturebyintroducinganewtypeofgentrification process, the ‘inherited gentrification’ with the identification of the second-generation gentrifiers of the island, who are the direct descendants of the first gentrifiers.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Okumuş, D. (2022). “Inherited Gentrification”: Changing Profiles ofGentrifiers via Inheritance, The Case of Bozcaada. ICONARP International Journal Of Architecture And Planning, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3, 143–168. https://ajindex.com/articles/538265

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (15)

  1. Akgün, A. A., Baycan-Levent, T., Nijkamp, P., & Poot, J. (2011). Roles of Local and Newcomer Entrepreneurs in Rural Development: A Comparative Meta-analytic Study. Regional Studies, 45(9), 1207–1223. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343401003792500
  2. Argent, N., Tonts, M., & Stockdale, A. (2014).
  3. Rural Migration, Agrarian Change, and Institutional Dynamics: Perspectives from the Majority World. Population, Space and Place, 20(4), 299–302. https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.1827
  4. Aydın, Z. (2002).
  5. The New Right, Structural Adjustment And Turkish Agriculture, Rural Responses And Survival Strategies. European Journal of Development Research, 14(2), 183–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/714000427
  6. Başaran Uysal, A., & Sakarya, I. (2018). Rural Gentrification in the North Aegean Countryside (Turkey). ICONARP, International Journal of Architecture & Planning, 6(1), 99–125. https://doi.org/10.15320
  7. Behar, D., & İslam, T. (2006). İstanbul’da Soylulastırma: Eski Kentin Yeni Sahipleri. Bilgi University Publications. Best, P., & Shucksmith, M. (2006). Homes for Rural Communities: Report of the Joseph Rowntree Foundation Rural Housing Policy Forum.Joseph Rowntree Foundation. Bijker, R. A., Haartsen, T., & Strijker, D. (2012). Migration to less-popular rural areas in the Netherlands: Exploring the motivations. Journal of Rural Studies, 28(4), 490–498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2012.07.003
  8. Butler, T. (2007). Re-urbanizing London Docklands: Gentrification, suburbanization and new urbanizim? International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 31(4), 759–781.
  9. Cloke, P. (1983). An Introduction to Rural Settlement Planning. Methuen. Cloke, P., Phillips, M., & Thrift, N. (1995). The new middle classes and the social constructs of rural living. In T. Butler & M. Savage (Eds.). Social Change and the Middle Classes(pp. 220–238).
  10. UCL Press.
  11. Darling, E. (2005). The city in the country: Wilderness gentrification and the rent gap. Environment and Plannning A, 37, 1015–1032.
  12. Davidson, M., & Lees, L. (2005). New-build “gentrification” and London’s riverside renaissance. Environment and Planning A, 37(7), 1165–1190. http://www.envplan.com/abstract.cgi?id=a3739
  13. Dinçer, Y., & Dinçer, İ. (2005).
  14. Historical Heritage, Conservation, Restoration in Small Towns and Question of Rural Gentrification in Turkey. ICOMOS 15th General Assembly and Scientific Symposium, 621–627.
  15. Enlil, Z. (2000). Yeniden İslevlendirme ve Soylulastırma: Bir Sınıfsal Proje Olarak Eski Kent Merkezlerinin ve Tarihi Konut Dokusunun Ye