Dergiler / ICONARP International Journal Of Architecture And Planning / 2021 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1

Evaluation of Ecological Design Principles in Traditional Houses in Mersin

Sayfa
25–52
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

FindingsIt is observable from the analysis that traditional vernacular architecture of Mersin has various qualities that are compatible with ecological design criteria of our day.Research Limitations/Implications30 traditional houses which have not been restored, have been chosen in Mersin old city centre.Originality/Value The results presented in charts and diagrams are aimed to serve as design recommendations in today’s architectural practice in the area and as an ecological pattern in sustainable development projects performed in the future.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Purpose Advancesintechnologyandrapidlydevelopingbuiltenvironmentleadtoincreasedenergyconsumption and depletion of natural resources while harming the environment.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The concept of ecological architecture emerged to generate solutions to these problems and various characteristics of traditional architecture, such as use of local and natural materials, energy saving etc. became important for contemporary ecological architecture.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:FindingsIt is observable from the analysis that traditional vernacular architecture of Mersin has various qualities that are compatible with ecological design criteria of our day.Research Limitations/Implications30 traditional houses which have not been restored, have been chosen in Mersin old city centre.Originality/Value The results presented in charts and diagrams are aimed to serve as design recommendations in today’s architectural practice in the area and as an ecological pattern in sustainable development projects performed in the future.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Purpose Advancesintechnologyandrapidlydevelopingbuiltenvironmentleadtoincreasedenergyconsumption and depletion of natural resources while harming the environment. The concept of ecological architecture emerged to generate solutions to these problems and various characteristics of traditional architecture, such as use of local and natural materials, energy saving etc. became important for contemporary ecological architecture. This paper addresses, from an ecological perspective,vernaculartraditionalarchitectureinMersin,whichhasrapidlygrownintoametropole from a 19th century Mediterranean port town. This study focuses on the ecological design components among traditional Mersin houses. The objective of this study is to reveal the relationships between vernacular traditional houses of Mersin and ecological architecture and to serve as a guide and reference for architects to design and construct in a way that they do not harm the natural environment and ecological balance by learning from vernacular architecture. Design/Methodology/ApproachFor the case study, 30 traditional houses located in Mersin old city centre, have been chosen to be inspected in terms of storey height, structural system, materials used for the construction, roof shape and materials, topography, selection of orientation, vegetation pattern, building form, spatial organisation,buildingenvelope,useofrenewableenergysources,sanitaryinstallationandcirculation systems. Yes and no scaled checklists were used to assess 30 traditional houses to identify the components of their ecological status and the quantitative data drawn from these checklists were used for the analyses of the urban texture. FindingsIt is observable from the analysis that traditional vernacular architecture of Mersin has various qualities that are compatible with ecological design criteria of our day.Research Limitations/Implications30 traditional houses which have not been restored, have been chosen in Mersin old city centre.Originality/Value The results presented in charts and diagrams are aimed to serve as design recommendations in today’s architectural practice in the area and as an ecological pattern in sustainable development projects performed in the future.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Birer, E., Gündoğdu, E. (2022). Evaluation of Ecological Design Principles in Traditional Houses in Mersin. ICONARP International Journal Of Architecture And Planning, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1, 25–52. https://ajindex.com/articles/538228

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (11)

  1. Adıyeke,N., Adıyeke,N. (2004).Modernleşmenin Doğurduğu Kent: Mersin.Sırtı Dağ, Yüzü Deniz: Mersin, Yapı Kredi Yayınları,
  2. Prep. Filiz Özdem, İstanbul, 69-89. Akdeniz Kent Araştırmaları Merkezi Raporu, (2005),
  3. MEÜ Mimarlık Fakültesi, Mersin Kültür Envanteri: Kentsel Kültür Varlıkları Belgeleme Projesi 1, Selim Ofset. Akkaya, Y. (2004). 19. Yüzyıldan 20. Yüzyıla Mersin Ekonomisi, Sırtı Dağ, Yüzü Deniz: Mersin, (Hazırlayan: Filiz Özdem), Yapı Kredi Yayınları, İstanbul, 335. Baran, M., M. Yıldırım, and A. Yılmaz, (2011). Evaluation of Ecological Design Strategies in Traditional Houses in Diyarbakir, Turkey,Journal of Cleaner Production19.6-7: 609-619.
  4. Bovea, M.D., Pérez-Belis, V., (2012). A Taxonomy of Ecodesign Tools for Integrating Environmental Requirements into the Product Design Process, Journal of Cleaner Production, 20: 61-71
  5. Buldum, B., Külekçi M., K.(2008). Mersin İlinin Güneş Enerjisi Potansiyeli ve Mevcut Durumu, VII. Ulusal Temiz Enerji Sempozyumu,İstanbul.
  6. Chandel, S. S., Sharma, V., Marwah, B. M. (2016). Review of Energy Efficient Features in Vernacular Architecture for Improving Indoor Thermal Comfort Conditions, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,65, pp. 459-477
  7. Crowther, R.L., (1992).
  8. Ecologic Architecture. Butterworth, Boston. Develi, Ş. (2001).Dünden Bugüne Mersin, 1836-1837, Mersin Ticaret ve Sanayi Odası Yayını, 143. Dizdar, İ. (2009). Mübadele ve Konut Bağlamında Mersin İhsaniye Mahallesi, TÜBA-KED, no:7, 125. Erdoğan, E., Yıldız, E.N. (2017).
  9. The Evaluation of Kayseri, Ağırnas Traditional Houses in the Frame of Ecological Design, Eurasian Journal of Agricultural Research, VOL1/1, 64-72.
  10. Gunewardene, N. (2016). Documentation of Vernacular Heritage in Architectural Education: ‘Measured Drawing of Devala Buildings’ with Level 1 Students of Architecture, University of Moratuwa, Sri Lanka, International Journal of Environmental Studies 73: 502–511. doi:10.1080/00207233.2016.1178983. Gültekin, A., Bengu A, (2011). Ecological Building Design Criteria: A Case Study in Ankara. Gazi University Journal of Science24.3, 605-616.
  11. Kaptanoğlu, İ.Z., Mıhçıoğlu Bilgi, E. (2018). Conservation of Historic Sarıyer District in Istanbul: Improving Sustainability and Energy Efficiency of A Bosphorus Village, Megaron, v.4, 1. Karahan, F., Davardoust, S., (2020). Evaluation of Vernacular Architecture of Uzundere District (Architectural Typology And Physical Form of Building) in Relation To Ecological Sustainable Development,Journal of Asian Architecture and