Dergiler / ICONARP International Journal Of Architecture And Planning / 2022 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1

Effects of Visual Environment on Students’ Adjustment to Stress

Sayfa
43–69
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

In general, in both stressed and unstressed conditions, the students gave the highest scores (>3.4) to convenience and the lowest score (

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The impact of stress on visual landscape perception was assessed in a photo-based survey.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In the main perceptual survey reactions to a selection of 22 landscape scenes photos were reported by ratings (1–5) of the extent to which each of six emotions was associated with each scene.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:In general, in both stressed and unstressed conditions, the students gave the highest scores (>3.4) to convenience and the lowest score (
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

The impact of stress on visual landscape perception was assessed in a photo-based survey. The survey was first performed when the student participants were expected to be stressed just prior to an important examination. The same students were asked to respond to the same questionnaire a month after the examination when they were expected to have a lower level of stress. Then respondents answered some daily activities, personal study habits, and feelings before an exam. They also provided ratings of how much a selection of environmental factors generally influence their ability to study and their academic success. In the main perceptual survey reactions to a selection of 22 landscape scenes photos were reported by ratings (1–5) of the extent to which each of six emotions was associated with each scene. Differences in emotions ratings for the represented landscapes during high-stress and low-stress periods were analyzed by multiple comparison and Pearson correlational methods using the SPSS 17.00 package. Stress tests confirmed higher stress in the first versus second survey and perceptual ratings showed significant statistical differences in emotion ratings between landscape scenes, as well as both main effects and interactions between high stress and low stress conditions. Scene ratings for each emotion were strongly positively correlated between high stress and lower stress conditions. At the same time, respondents generally gave slightly higher ratings for positive emotions -excited, relaxing, happiness-when in the high stress condition and moderately higher ratings for negative emotions -stressed, irritating, scary-, compared to their ratings when tested later under lower stress conditions. This study indicated that stress conditions affect perception, and stressed conditions gave higher emotionality overall than the unstressed condition. In general, in both stressed and unstressed conditions, the students gave the highest scores (>3.4) to convenience and the lowest score (

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Yılmaz, S. (2022). Effects of Visual Environment on Students’ Adjustment to Stress. ICONARP International Journal Of Architecture And Planning, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1, 43–69. https://ajindex.com/articles/538204

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (10)

  1. Adevi, A. A., & Lieberg, M. (2012). Stress rehabilitation through garden therapy: A caregiver perspective on factors considered most essential to the recovery process. Urban forestry & urban greening, 11(1), 51-58.
  2. Baltas-Baltas, Education. ( 1997). Counseling Center. Team Building and Development Seminar Manual Book. Character Color: İstanbul.
  3. Barton, J., & Pretty, J. (2010). What is the best dose of nature and green exercise for improving mental health? A multi-study analysis. Environmental science & technology, 44(10), 3947-3955.
  4. Babakhani, R. (2017). Color and light in architecture and its effects on spirits of space users in a psychological view. Journal of Architectural Engineering Technology, 6(1). Beil, K., & Hanes, D. (2013). The influence of urban natural and built environments on physiological and psychological measures of stress—A pilot study. International journal of environmental research and public health, 10(4), 1250-1267.
  5. Bergen, S. D., Ulbricht, C. A., Fridley, J. L., & Ganter, M. A. (1995). The validity of computer-generated graphic images of forest landscape. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15(2), 135-146.
  6. Billings, A. G., & Moos, R. H. (1981). The role of coping responses and social resources in attenuating the stress of life events. Journal of behavioral medicine, 4(2), 139-157.
  7. Bringslimark, T., Hartig, T., & Patil, G. G. (2009). The psychological benefits of indoor plants: A critical review of the experimental literature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(4), 422-433.
  8. Bostancı, S. H., & Oral, M. (2017). Experimental approach on the cognitive perception of historical urban skyline. ICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planning, 5, 45-59.
  9. Byrne, J., Sipe, N., & Searle, G. (2010). Green around the gills? The challenge of density for urban greenspace planning in SEQ. Australian Planner, 47(3), 162- 177. Carlson, A. (2010). Contemporary environmental aesthetics and the requirements of environmentalism. Environmental Values, 19(3), 289-314.
  10. Cao, J., Wang, J., Wu, X., Ding, C., Wang, W., & Wang, H. (2020). Post⁃ evaluation of urban river open space landscape restoration: a case study of the eastern part of the Inner Qinhuai River in Nanjing. Journal Of Nanjıng Forestry Unıversıty, 44(3), 195. Cerwén, G., Pedersen, E., & Pálsdóttir, A. M. (2016). The role of soundscape in nature-based rehabilitation: A patient perspective. International journal of environmental research and public health, 13(12), 1229. Cohen, S., Kam