Dergiler / Horticultural Studies / 2020 / Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 2

Effect of Irrigation Waters in Different Salinity Levelson Crop Yield and Energy Use in Greenhouse TomatoProduction in Turkey: A Case Study in KırklareliProvince

Sayfa
123–133
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

It was concluded that the optimum method should be on lowsalinity level and the irrigation water application should be on the level in orderto bring the current moisture level to the field capacity.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This study was carried out in a quonset type plastic covered unheatedgreenhouse on the lands of Atatürk Soil Water and Agricultural MeteorologyInstitute in Kırklareli, Turkey.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In the study, the effect of different salinity andirrigation water levels which were applied to tomato plant, irrigated by dripirrigation in greenhouse, on yield and energy use efficiency was evaluated andthe optimum irrigation application was determined.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:It was concluded that the optimum method should be on lowsalinity level and the irrigation water application should be on the level in orderto bring the current moisture level to the field capacity.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

This study was carried out in a quonset type plastic covered unheatedgreenhouse on the lands of Atatürk Soil Water and Agricultural MeteorologyInstitute in Kırklareli, Turkey. In the study, the effect of different salinity andirrigation water levels which were applied to tomato plant, irrigated by dripirrigation in greenhouse, on yield and energy use efficiency was evaluated andthe optimum irrigation application was determined. In the study, ‘Swanson $F^1$’type tomato was grown as plant material. The trial was carried out on 36 plots with three replications according to split plots experimental design and fourdifferent irrigation water salinity levels were on main plots and three irrigationlevels were on sub plots. The best result was obtained from $T_1S_2$ subject interms of yield and energy use efficiency. The average yield was determined as109 060 kg $ha^{-1}$ and energy output/input ratio, energy productivity and specificenergy were found as 1.51, 1.89 kg $MJ^{-1}$ and 0.53 MJ $kg^{-1}$ in $T_1S_2$ subject,respectively. It was concluded that the optimum method should be on lowsalinity level and the irrigation water application should be on the level in orderto bring the current moisture level to the field capacity.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

AYDIN, B., ÇEBİ, U., ÖZER, S., ÖZTÜRK, O. (2022). Effect of Irrigation Waters in Different Salinity Levelson Crop Yield and Energy Use in Greenhouse TomatoProduction in Turkey: A Case Study in KırklareliProvince. Horticultural Studies, Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 2, 123–133. https://ajindex.com/articles/538129

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (9)

  1. Abdel Gawad, G., Arslan, A., Gaihbe, A., & Kadouri F. (2005). The effects of saline irrigation water management and salt tolerant tomato varieties on sustainable production of tomato in Syria (1999- 2002). Agricultural Water Management, 78:39-53. Anonymous (2018a). http://bahcebitkileri.cu.edu.tr/uplod/ nturemis/turkiyeortualti.pdf (Data accessed April 25, 2018). Anonymous (2018b). www.tarim.gov.tr (Date accessed April 25, 2018).
  2. Atay, A.N. (2006). Harran ovası koşullarında damla sulama sistemi ile sulanan biberin tuza dayanımının belirlenmesi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Harran Üniversitesi, Şanlıurfa (in Turkish). Baran, M.F., & Gökdoğan, O. (2014). Karpuz ve kavun yetiştiriciliğinde enerji girdi-çıktı analizi: Kırklareli ili örneği. Anadolu Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, 29:217-224.
  3. Baran, M.F., Oğuz, H.İ., & Gökdoğan, O. (2016). Determining the energy usage efficiency of walnut (Juglans regia L.) cultivation in Turkey. ErwerbsObstbau, 59:77-82.
  4. Bilalis, D., Kamariari, P.E., Karkanis, A., Efthimiadou, A., Zorpas, A., & Kakabouki, I. (2013). Energy inputs, output and productivity in organic and conventional maize and tomato production, under Mediterranean conditions. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanica, 41:190-194.
  5. Cuartero, J., & Fernandez-Munoz, R. (1999). Tomato and salinity. Scientia Horticulture, 78:83-125.
  6. Çanakçı, M., & Akıncı, I. (2006). Energy use pattern analyses of greenhouse vegetable production. Energy, 31:1243-1256.
  7. Çanakçı, M., Topakçı, M., Akıncı, İ., & Özmerzi, A. (2005). Energy use pattern of some field crops and vegetable production: case study for Antalya region, Turkey. Energy and Conversion Management, 46:655-666.
  8. Çetin, B., & Vardar, A. (2008). An economic analysis of energy requirements and input costs for tomato production in Turkey. Renewable Energy, 33:428- 433. Darijani, F., Veisi, H., Khoshbakht, K., Liaghati, H., & Alipour, A. (2012). An input-output energy analysis in intensive agro-ecosystems: a case study of greenhouse cucumber production in Varamin county of Tehran province, Iran. Environmental Sciences, 10:79-90.
  9. De, D., Singh, S., & Chandra, H. (2001). Technological impact on energy consumption in rain fed soybean cultivation in Madhya Pradesh. Applied Energy, 70:193-213. Dimitrijević, A., Đević, M., Blažin, S., & Blažin, D. (2010). Energy efficiency of the lettuce greenhouse production. http:// agris.fao.org/agris -search.do? recordID (Data accessed: November 25, 2019). Dimitrijević, A., Blažin, S., Blažin, D., & Ponjican, O. (20