KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Hitit Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 2

IS OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE EFFECTIVE IN TAKING RISKS OF BANKS? THE CASE OF TURKEY

Şenol BABUŞCU
Adalet HAZAR
M. Oğuz KÖKSAL
Sayfa
385–407
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

In the framework of the data obtained from the analysis, there was no effect of capital ownership and capital concentration on the risk taking tendency of the banks in the Turkish Banking Sector.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:In this study, the relationship between the capital ownership and risk taking tendency of banks is analysed.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The data of each bank for the end of 2008-2017 are taken into consideration.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:In the framework of the data obtained from the analysis, there was no effect of capital ownership and capital concentration on the risk taking tendency of the banks in the Turkish Banking Sector.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2008-2017 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

In this study, the relationship between the capital ownership and risk taking tendency of banks is analysed. The data of multi-branch deposit banks from the banks operating during the analysis period were included in the study. The data of each bank for the end of 2008-2017 are taken into consideration. A total of 2800 variables consisting of 14 different variables belonging to 20 deposit banks covering 10 years were used in the analysis. From the 20 banks taken into account in the analysis; 3 are public, 11 are domestic private and 6 are foreign banks with private capital. One of the most striking points in the study is that the derivative financial instruments / equity variable included in the analysis as an independent variable and 3 risk indicators are in a meaningful relationship. In the framework of the data obtained from the analysis, there was no effect of capital ownership and capital concentration on the risk taking tendency of the banks in the Turkish Banking Sector.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

BABUŞCU, Ş., HAZAR, A., KÖKSAL, M. O. (2022). IS OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE EFFECTIVE IN TAKING RISKS OF BANKS? THE CASE OF TURKEY. Hitit Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 2, 385–407. https://ajindex.com/articles/537783

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (7)

  1. Aghion, P., Tirole, J. (1997). Formal and real authority in organizations. Journal of Political Economy, 55, 1–27. doi: https://doi.org/10.1086/262063
  2. Altunbas, Y., Evans L., and Molyneux, P. (2001). Bank ownership and efficiency. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 33(4), 926-954. Retrieved from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2673929?seq=1
  3. Altunbas, Y., Gardener, E. P.M., Molyneux, P., and Moore, B. (2001). Efficiency in European banking. European Economic Review, 45(10), 1931–1955. doi.org/10.1016/S0014- 2921(00)00091-X Anderson, R. C., and Fraser, D. R.(2000), Corporate control, bank risk taking, and the health of the banking industry. Journal of Banking & Finance, 24, 1383-1398. doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4266(99)00088-6
  4. Angkinand, A., and Wihlborg,C. (2010). Deposit insurance coverage, ownership, and banks’ risktaking in emerging markets. Journal of International Money and Finance, 29, 252–274. doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2009.08.001 Barry,T.A., Lepetit,L., and Tarazi,A. (2011). Ownership structure and risk in publicly held and privately owned banks. Journal of Banking & Finance, 35, 1327-1340. doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2010.10.004 Berger, A., Clarke, G., Cill, R., Klapper, L., and Udell, G. (2005). Corporate governance and bank performance: a joint analysis of the static, selection, and dynamic effects of domestic, foreign, and state ownership. Journal of Banking and Finance, 29, 2179–2221. doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-3632
  5. Bliss, R., and Flannery, M. (2002). Market discipline in the governance of US bank holding companies: monitoring vs. influencing. European Finance Review, 6(3), 361– 396. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022021430852
  6. Bonin, J.P., Hasan, I., and Wachtel, P. (2005). Bank performance, efficiency and ownership in transition countries. Journal of Banking and Finance, 29, 31–54. doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2004.06.015 Caprio, G., and Martinez-Peria, M.S. (2000). Avoiding disaster: policies to reduce the risk of banking crises. Egyptian Center for Economic Studies (ECES).Working Paper 47. Publication Number: ECESWP47-E Retrieved from: http://www.eces.org.eg/cms/NewsUploads /Pdf/2019_1_7-22_22_38SSS.pdf Claessens, S., Demirguc-Kunt, A., and Huizinga, H. (2001). How does foreign entry affect the domestic banking market?, Journal of Banking and Finance, 25, 891–911. Retrieved from: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2894623
  7. Clarke, G. R. G., Cull, R., and Shirley, M. M. (2005). Bank privatization in developing countries: A summary of les