Dergiler / Haydarpaşa Numune Medical Journal / 2020 / Cilt: 60 - Sayı: 3

Does the Surgical Technique Affect the Results of Partial Nephrectomy Performed for Renal Cell Carcinoma? Single-center 'MIC' Score and 'Trifecta' Results

Sayfa
234–240
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy is the most powerful alternative technique for open partial nephrectomy with low complication rates, shorter operation time, similar ischemia durationsand oncologic outcomes.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Introduction: To report the MIC scores and trifecta rates in patients who underwent partial nephrectomy with open (OPN),laparoscopic (LPN) and robot-assisted techniques (RPN) due to kidney tumor.Methods: Demographic characteristics, tumor characteristics, peri-and post-operative data and complications of the patients who underwent OPN (n=58), LPN (n=32) and RPN (n=126) between 2007 and August 2018 due to kidney tumor andhistopathological features were evaluated retrospectively in this study.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:To report oncological and functional outcomes ofnephron-sparing surgery for renal tumors, MIC (surgical margin negativity, ischemia duration less than 20 minutes and lackof complication) and Trifecta (surgical margin negativity, perioperative complications and glomerular filtration rate (GFR)>90% protection rate) were used.Results: RPN was superior to OPN technique in hospitalization and estimated bleeding.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy is the most powerful alternative technique for open partial nephrectomy with low complication rates, shorter operation time, similar ischemia durationsand oncologic outcomes.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2007 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Introduction: To report the MIC scores and trifecta rates in patients who underwent partial nephrectomy with open (OPN),laparoscopic (LPN) and robot-assisted techniques (RPN) due to kidney tumor.Methods: Demographic characteristics, tumor characteristics, peri-and post-operative data and complications of the patients who underwent OPN (n=58), LPN (n=32) and RPN (n=126) between 2007 and August 2018 due to kidney tumor andhistopathological features were evaluated retrospectively in this study. To report oncological and functional outcomes ofnephron-sparing surgery for renal tumors, MIC (surgical margin negativity, ischemia duration less than 20 minutes and lackof complication) and Trifecta (surgical margin negativity, perioperative complications and glomerular filtration rate (GFR)>90% protection rate) were used.Results: RPN was superior to OPN technique in hospitalization and estimated bleeding. Transfusion rate and all complications were similar in all three techniques. Although OPN had shorter operation time and ischemia time, there was a higheramount of blood loss and hospital stay. No significant difference was found between all three techniques for surgical marginpositivity and >90% preservation of GFR. The mean duration of warm ischemia was 23.6 minutes with the longest LPN, followed by a mean of 18.4 minutes with an RPN and a mean of 16.6 minutes with OPN (p=0.003). It was significantly longer.Our MIC score was 79% in OPN, 71% in LPN and 81.7% in RPN (p=0.04). Our Trifectaoranes were 87% in OPN, 87.5% in LPNand 93.6% in RPN (p=0.128).Discussion and Conclusion: Both the 'MIC score system 'and the 'Trifecta' system are easy to use and reproducible systemsfor reporting partial nephrectomy results for renal tumors. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy is the most powerful alternative technique for open partial nephrectomy with low complication rates, shorter operation time, similar ischemia durationsand oncologic outcomes.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KÜÇÜK, E. V., İNKAYA, A., TAHRA, A., SOBAY, R., BOYLU, U. (2022). Does the Surgical Technique Affect the Results of Partial Nephrectomy Performed for Renal Cell Carcinoma? Single-center 'MIC' Score and 'Trifecta' Results. Haydarpaşa Numune Medical Journal, Cilt: 60 - Sayı: 3, 234–240. https://ajindex.com/articles/535939

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Siegel R, Ma J, Zou Z, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin 2014;64:9–29
  2. Asimakopoulos AD, Miano R, Annino F, Micali S, Spera E, Iorio B, Vespasiani G, Gaston R. Robotic radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review. BMC Urol 2014;14:75
  3. Robson CJ, Churchill BM, Anderson W. The results of radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 1969;101:297– 301
  4. Weight CJ, Lieser G, Larson BT, Gao T, Lane BR, Campbell SC, et al. Partial nephrectomy is associated with improved overall survival compared to radical nephrectomy in patients with unanticipated benign renal tumours. Eur Urol 2010;58:293–8
  5. Ljungberg B, Bensalah K, Canfield S, Dabestani S, Hofmann F, Hora M, et al. EAU guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: 2014 update. Eur Urol 2015;67:913–24
  6. Gill IS, Kavoussi LR, Lane BR, Blute ML, Babineau D, Colombo JR Jr, et al. Comparison of 1,800 laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomies for single renal tumors. J Urol 2007;178:41–6
  7. Patel VR, Coelho RF, Chauhan S, Orvieto MA, Palmer KJ, Rocco B, et al. Continence, potency and oncological outcomes after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: early trifecta results of a high-volume surgeon. BJU Int 2010;106:696–702
  8. Buffi N, Lista G, Larcher A, Lughezzani G, Ficarra V, Cestari A, et al. Margin, ischemia, and complications (MIC) score in partial nephrectomy: a new system for evaluating achievement of optimal outcomes in nephron-sparing surgery. Eur Urol 2012;62:617–8
  9. Hung AJ, Cai J, Simmons MN, Gill IS. "Trifecta" in partial nephrectomy. J Urol 2013;189:36–42
  10. Masson-Lecomte A, Yates DR, Hupertan V, Haertig A, ChartierKastler E, Bitker MO, et al. A prospective comparison of the pathologic and surgical outcomes obtained after elective treatment of renal cell carcinoma by open or robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. Urol Oncol 2013;31:924–9
  11. Ricciardulli S, Ding Q, Zhang X, Li H, Tang Y, Yang G, et al. Evaluation of laparoscopic vs robotic partial nephrectomy using the margin, ischemia and complications score system: a retrospective single center analysis. Arch Ital Urol Androl 2015;87:49–55
  12. Benway BM, Bhayani SB. Surgical outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. BJU Int 2011;108:955–61
  13. Deane LA, Lee HJ, Box GN, Melamud O, Yee DS, Abraham JB, et al. Robotic versus standard laparoscopic partial/wedge nephrectomy: a comparison of intraoperative and perioperative results from a single institution. J Endourol 2008;22:947– 52