Dergiler / Haydarpaşa Numune Medical Journal / 2021 / Cilt: 61 - Sayı: 2

Comparison of Femtosecond-Assisted Laser in Situ Keratomileusis and Wavefront-Guided Femtosecond- Assisted Laser in Situ Keratomileusis Procedures in Terms of High-Order Aberrations

Sayfa
160–165
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

FS-LASIK induces more spherical aberration, coma, and trefoil than WFG FS-LASIK procedure, meaning it causes more HOAs.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Introduction: To compare the results of femtosecond-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) and wavefront-guided FS-LASIK (WFG FS-LASIK) procedures in terms of high-order aberrations (HOAs).
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Methods: One hundred and twenty-eight eyes of 64 patients with myopia and/or myopic astigmatism who had undergone FS-LASIK procedure comprised Group I.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:FS-LASIK induces more spherical aberration, coma, and trefoil than WFG FS-LASIK procedure, meaning it causes more HOAs.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Introduction: To compare the results of femtosecond-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) and wavefront-guided FS-LASIK (WFG FS-LASIK) procedures in terms of high-order aberrations (HOAs). Methods: One hundred and twenty-eight eyes of 64 patients with myopia and/or myopic astigmatism who had undergone FS-LASIK procedure comprised Group I. Their mean age was 27.87±5.49 (19–41) years. Thirty-two of them were male (50%) and 32 (50%) were female. One hundred and twenty-eight eyes of 64 patients with myopia and/or myopic astigmatism who had undergone WFG FS-LASIK procedure comprised Group II. Their mean age was 28.56±6.01 (19–42) years. Thirty-two of them were male (50%) and 32 (50%) were female. Two groups are compared with each other in terms of HOAs. Results: In respect to age and sex, there was no significant difference between FS-LASIK and WFG FS-LASIK groups (p>0.050). Regarding pre-operative and post-operative spherical, cylindrical, and spherical equivalent values, uncorrected distance vi- sual acuity, and corrected distance visual acuity, there was no significant difference between two groups (p>0.050). FS-LASIK induced more spherical aberration, coma, and trefoil than WFG FS-LASIK (p=0.000). Discussion and Conclusion: In conclusion, both FS-LASIK and WFG FS-LASIK are effective and safe procedures in the treat- ment of myopia and myopic astigmatism. FS-LASIK induces more spherical aberration, coma, and trefoil than WFG FS-LASIK procedure, meaning it causes more HOAs.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ÇETİNKAYA, S. (2022). Comparison of Femtosecond-Assisted Laser in Situ Keratomileusis and Wavefront-Guided Femtosecond- Assisted Laser in Situ Keratomileusis Procedures in Terms of High-Order Aberrations. Haydarpaşa Numune Medical Journal, Cilt: 61 - Sayı: 2, 160–165. https://ajindex.com/articles/535929

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Hamill MB, Berdy GJ, Davidson RS, Majmudar PA, Randleman JB, Shamie N, et al. Refractive Surgery. San Francisco, Califor- nia, United States: American Academy of Ophthalmology; 2015. p. 74–5
  2. Du CX, Shen Y, Wang Y. Comparison of high-order aberration after conventional and customized ablation in myopic LASIK in different eyes of the same patient. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B 2007;8:177–80
  3. Mrochen M, Kammerer M, Mierdel P, Seiler T. Increased high- er-order optical aberrations after laser refractive surgery: Aproblem of subclinical decentration. J Cataract Refract Surg 2001;27:362–9
  4. Moreno-Barriuso E, Lloves JM, Marcos S, Navarro R, Llorente L, Barbero S. Ocular aberrations before and after myopic corneal refractive surgery: LASIK-induced changes measured with la- ser ray tracing. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2001;42:1396–403
  5. Zhang J, Zhou YH, Li R, Tian L. Visual performance after con- ventional LASIK and wavefront-guided LASIK with iris regis- tration: Results at 1 year. Int J Ophthalmol 2013;6:498–504
  6. Baek T, Lee K, Kagaya F, Tomidokoro A, Amano S, Oshika T. Fac- tors affecting the forward shift of posterior corneal surface af- ter laser in situ keratomileusis. Ophthalmology 2001;108:317–20
  7. Seitz B, Torres F, Langenbucher A, Behrens A, Suarez E. Poste- rior corneal curvature changes after myopic laser in situ ker- atomileusis. Ophthalmology 2001;108:666–72
  8. Wilson SE, Mohan RR, Hong JW, Lee JS, Choi R, Mohan RR. The wound healing response after laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy: Elusive control of biological variability and effect on custom laser vision correction. Arch Ophthalmol 2001;119:889–96
  9. Nuijts RM, Nabar VA, Hament WJ, Eggink FA. Wavefront-guid- ed versus standard laser in situ keratomileusis to correct low to moderate myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg 2002;28:1907–13
  10. Stonecipher KG, Kezirian GM. Wavefront-optimized versus wavefront-guided LASIK for myopic astigmatism with the Allegretto wave: Three-months results of a prospective FDA trial. J Refract Surg 2008;24:S424–30
  11. Klyce SD, Karon MD, Sonolek MK. Advantages and disad- vantages of Zernike expansion for representing wave aber- ration of the normal eye and aberrated eye. J Refract Surg 2004;20:S537–41
  12. Salmon TO, van de Pol C.Normal eye Zernike coefficents and root-mean-square wavefronr errors. J Cataract Refract Surg 2006;32:2064–74
  13. Jun I, Kang DS, Arba-Mosquera S, Choi JY, Lee HK, Kim EK, et al. Comparison between wavefront