Dergiler / Haydarpaşa Numune Medical Journal / 2021 / Cilt: 61 - Sayı: 3

Comparison of "Onlay" and "Sublay" Methods of Mesh Repair of Incisional Hernia in Terms of Early and Late Period Wound Complications

Sayfa
304–309
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Both methods can be applied with similar efficacy and safety.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Introduction: Different approaches are used depending on placement of mesh in the surgical treatment of incisional hernia.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Methods: Patients who underwent mesh repair of incisional hernia in our hospital for a 2-year retrospective study were eval- uated.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Both methods can be applied with similar efficacy and safety.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Introduction: Different approaches are used depending on placement of mesh in the surgical treatment of incisional hernia. These methods have controversial results in terms of wound complications and recurrence. In this study, it was aimed to compare open mesh repair of incisional hernia using the approaches of "onlay" and "sublay" mesh placement in terms of complications and recurrence. Methods: Patients who underwent mesh repair of incisional hernia in our hospital for a 2-year retrospective study were eval- uated. The patients were divided into two groups according to the placement of the polypropylene mesh: "onlay" (Group O, n=27) and "sublay" (Group S, n=25). Demographic and clinical data of the patients were recorded. Postoperative early (seroma, hematoma, wound infection) and late (chronic pain, recurrence) complications were compared between groups. Results: There were 52 patients in the study with a mean age of 60.4±12 years. There was no difference between the groups in terms of demographic and clinical characteristics (p>0.05). The mean duration of the surgery in Group S was significantly longer than Group O (p=0.02). Although the length of hospital stay was longer in Group S, there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of the length of hospital stay (p=0.067). There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of early and late wound complications (p>0.05). Discussion and Conclusion: There is no significant difference between early and late wound complications after mesh repair of incisional hernia with "onlay" and "sublay" methods. Both methods can be applied with similar efficacy and safety.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

BİLSEL, Y., OKUYAN, G. Ç. (2022). Comparison of "Onlay" and "Sublay" Methods of Mesh Repair of Incisional Hernia in Terms of Early and Late Period Wound Complications. Haydarpaşa Numune Medical Journal, Cilt: 61 - Sayı: 3, 304–309. https://ajindex.com/articles/535908

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Acar T, Acar N, Sür Y, Kamer E, Atahan K, Genç H, et al. The ef- fects of operation technique on recurrence of incisional her - nia repair. Sisli Etfal Hastan Tip Bul 2020
  2. 23–8. [Turkish] 2. Abdollahi A, Maddah GH, Mehrabi BM, Jangjoo A, Forghani MN, Sharbaf N. Prosthetic incisional hernioplasty: clinical ex- perience with 354 cases. Hernia 2010
  3. 569–73. 3. Eriksson A, Rosenberg J, Bisgaard T. Surgical treatment for gi- ant incisional hernia: a qualitative systematic review. Hernia 2014
  4. 31–8. 4. Chand B, Indeck M, Needleman B, Finnegan M, Van Sickle KR, Ystgaard B, et al. A retrospective study evaluating the use of Permacol™ surgical implant in incisional and ventral hernia re- pair. Int J Surg 2014
  5. 296–303. 5. Ayik N, Klein P, Grützmann R, Demir R. Long-term Outcome of incisional hernia repairs using the Erlangen Inlay Onlay Mesh (EIOM) Technique. J Surg Res 2019
  6. 14–22. 6. Köckerling F, Hoffmann H, Mayer F, Zarras K, Reinpold W, Fortelny R, et al. What are the trends in incisional hernia re- pair? Real-world data over 10 years from the Herniamed reg- istry. Hernia 2021
  7. 255–65. 7. Martín-Cartes JA, Tamayo-López MJ, Bustos-Jiménez M. 'Sandwich' technique in the treatment of large and complex incisional hernias. ANZ J Surg 2016
  8. 343–7. 8. Kingsnorth AN, Sivarajasingham N, Wong S, Butler M. Open mesh repair of incisional hernias with significant loss of do - main. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2004
  9. 363–6. 9. Holihan JL, Nguyen DH, Nguyen MT, Mo J, Kao LS, Liang MK. Mesh location in open ventral hernia repair: a systematic re- view and network meta-analysis. World J Surg 2016
  10. 89–99. 10. Ibrahim R, Abounozha S, Alshehri T. Is the surgical site infec- tion rate higher in sublay or onlay mesh repair of incisional hernia? Ann Med Surg (Lond) 2021
  11. 200–2. 11. Ibrahim R, Alshehri T, Abounozha S. Is the recurrence rate of incisional hernia is affected by mesh positioning? Ann Med Surg (Lond) 2021
  12. 92–4. 12. Ibrahim R, Abounozha S, Kheder A, Alshahri T. Incidence of seroma in sublay versus onlay mesh repair of incisional hernia. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 2020
  13. 155–7. 13. Cano-Valderrama O, Porrero JL, Quirós E, Bonachia O, Castillo MJ, Cervantes N, et al. Is onlay polypropylene mesh repair an available option for incisional hernia repair? a retrospective cohort study. Am Surg 2019
  14. 183–7. 14. Rogmark P, Petersson U, Bringman S, Eklund A, Ezra E, Sevo- nius D, et al. Short-term outcomes for open and laparoscopic midline incisional hernia repair: a