Dergiler / Haydarpaşa Numune Medical Journal / 2021 / Cilt: 61 - Sayı: 3

The Reasons for High Reintubation Frequency in Intensive Care: A Retrospective Study

Sayfa
325–330
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Therefore, before plan- ning the extubation of patients, correcting the main problem causing respiratory support and reviewing other risk factors that may cause reintubation, will reduce the risk of reintubation.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Introduction: Mechanical ventilation is frequently applied in 3rd level intensive care units.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Reintubation causes increase in morbidity and mortality in intensive care.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Therefore, before plan- ning the extubation of patients, correcting the main problem causing respiratory support and reviewing other risk factors that may cause reintubation, will reduce the risk of reintubation.
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:2018 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Introduction: Mechanical ventilation is frequently applied in 3rd level intensive care units. Some patients may require reintu- bation due to positive fluid balance, electrolyte imbalances, prolonged mechanical ventilation, protein-energy imbalances, or age. Reintubation causes increase in morbidity and mortality in intensive care. Hence, we investigated the rates and causes of reintubation in our clinic. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the files of patients hospitalized in intensive care during the 18-month period from June 1, 2018, to January 1, 2019. We recorded patients with successful intubation and patients who were reintubated. Results: Eighty-four patients who met the criteria were included in the study. The patients were studied under two groups, namely, 43 reintubated patients (51.2%) and 41 successfully extubated patients (48.8%). Mean age, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Assessment II values, and comorbidity rates of the reintubation group were statistically significantly higher than of the successful extubation group. The rate of inotrope treatment (48.8%) in the reintubation group was statistically significantly higher than in the successful extubation group (14.6%). No statistically significant difference was found be - tween reintubation and successful extubation groups in terms of energy and protein intake. Discussion and Conclusion: Mechanical ventilation treatment in intensive care can usually be finished without any prob- lems. However, some patients may need mechanical ventilation treatment again. Reintubation can occur as an unexpected result of mechanical ventilation and increase mortality in intensive care. Reintubation-mortality relationship has been shown in many studies. Our study reports that mortality rate is approximately 2-fold in reintubated patients. Therefore, before plan- ning the extubation of patients, correcting the main problem causing respiratory support and reviewing other risk factors that may cause reintubation, will reduce the risk of reintubation.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

SARI, A., EKİNCİ, O., AKMAN, D. (2022). The Reasons for High Reintubation Frequency in Intensive Care: A Retrospective Study. Haydarpaşa Numune Medical Journal, Cilt: 61 - Sayı: 3, 325–330. https://ajindex.com/articles/535885

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Mancebo J. Weaning from mechanical ventilation. Eur Respir J 1996;9:1923–31
  2. Dries DJ. Weaning from mechanical ventilation. J Trauma 1997;43:372–84
  3. Boles JM, Bion J, Connors A, Herridge M, Marsh B, Melot C, et al. Weaning from mechanical ventilation. Eur Respir J 2007;29:1033–56
  4. Esteban A, Alía I, Ibañez J, Benito S, Tobin MJ. Modes of me - chanical ventilation and weaning. A national survey of Span- ish hospitals. The Spanish Lung Failure Collaborative Group. Chest 1994;106:1188–93
  5. Esteban A, Anzueto A, Frutos F, Alía I, Brochard L, Stewart TE, et al. Characteristics and outcomes in adult patients receiving mechanical ventilation: a 28-day international study. JAMA 2002;287:345–55
  6. Fujii E, Fujino K, Tanaka-Mizuno S, Eguchi Y. Variation of risk factors for cause-specific reintubation: a preliminary study. Can Respir J 2018;2018:3654251
  7. Esteban A, Alía I, Gordo F, Fernández R, Solsona JF, Vallverdú I, et al. Extubation outcome after spontaneous breathing tri- als with T-tube or pressure support ventilation. The Spanish Lung Failure Collaborative Group. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1997;156:459–65 8. Frutos-Vivar F, Ferguson ND, Esteban A, Epstein SK, Arabi Y, Apezteguía C, et al. Risk factors for extubation failure in pa- tients following a successful spontaneous breathing trial. Ch- est 2006;130:1664–71
  8. Thille AW, Boissier F, Ben Ghezala H, Razazi K, Mekontso- Dessap A, Brun-Buisson C. Risk factors for and prediction by caregivers of extubation failure in ICU patients: A prospective study. Crit Care Med 2015;43:613–20
  9. Peñuelas O, Frutos-Vivar F, Fernández C, Anzueto A, Epstein SK, Apezteguía C, et al. Characteristics and outcomes of ven- tilated patients according to time to liberation from mechani- cal ventilation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2011;184:430–7
  10. Ochoa ME, del Carmen Marín M, Frutos-Vivar F, Gordo F, La- tour-Pérez J, Calvo E, et al. Cuff-leak test for the diagnosis of upper airway obstruction in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med 2009;35:1171–9
  11. Coplin WM, Pierson DJ, Cooley KD, Newell DW, Rubenfeld GD. Implications of extubation delay in brain-injured patients meeting standard weaning criteria. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000;161:1530–6
  12. Thille AW, Cortés-Puch I, Esteban A. Weaning from the ventila- tor and extubation in ICU. Curr Opin Crit Care 2013;19:57–64
  13. Upadya A, Tilluckdharry L, Muralidharan V, Amoateng-Adje- pong Y, Manthous CA. Fluid balance and weaning out