KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Haydarpaşa Numune Medical Journal / 2022 / Cilt: 62 - Sayı: 2

How Effective and Safe is Limberg Flap in the Treatment of Pilonidal Sinus

Tuğrul KESİCİOĞLU
İsmail AYDIN
Sayfa
150–156
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Furthermore, the surgical method to be chosen should be Limberg flap that is a reliable and effective procedure with its low recurrence rates, short hospitalization period, and low rate of complications.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Introduction: A pilonidal sinus (PS) is a disease that arises from chronic irritation and secondary inflammation of hair follicles located in the sacrococcygeal and natal region.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Methods: The files of patients who were operated in our clinic between January 2015 and October 2019 with the diagnosis of PS were examined retrospectively.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Furthermore, the surgical method to be chosen should be Limberg flap that is a reliable and effective procedure with its low recurrence rates, short hospitalization period, and low rate of complications.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2015 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Introduction: A pilonidal sinus (PS) is a disease that arises from chronic irritation and secondary inflammation of hair follicles located in the sacrococcygeal and natal region. The purpose of this study was to determine the results of patients who underwent Limberg flap with the diagnosis of PS and the effectiveness of Limberg flap. Methods: The files of patients who were operated in our clinic between January 2015 and October 2019 with the diagnosis of PS were examined retrospectively. In addition to the demographical features of patients who have applied Limberg flap, type of the disease, the duration of the surgery, the hospitalization duration, the existence of complications after the surgery, and recurrence of the disease were analyzed. Results: Of 212 patients included in the study, 158 (74.5%) were male and 54 (25.4%) were female. The average age of the patients was 26.3 (18–44). 8 (3.73%) of the patients had Type-1, 48 (22.6%) had Type-3, 101 (47.6%) had Type-4, and 29 (13.6%) had Type-5 diseases. Patients who had Type-5 disease were found to recur after different surgical techniques. Due to the Type-2 disease, 26 (12.2%) patients underwent abscess drainage and Limberg flap approximately 3 weeks later. The average surgery period was 42.5 (32–78) min. Wound infection has been seen in 12 (5.6%) patients and wound dehiscence has been seen in 7 (3.3%) patients. Wet dressing and primary repair were performed at the lower edge of the flap because of the local recurrence to 5 (2.3%) patients. Discussion and Conclusion: Nowadays, though it is stated that minimal invasive methods are effective for the treatment of the disease, we believe that surgical methods are more appropriate for the treatment. Furthermore, the surgical method to be chosen should be Limberg flap that is a reliable and effective procedure with its low recurrence rates, short hospitalization period, and low rate of complications.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KESİCİOĞLU, T., AYDIN, İ. (2022). How Effective and Safe is Limberg Flap in the Treatment of Pilonidal Sinus. Haydarpaşa Numune Medical Journal, Cilt: 62 - Sayı: 2, 150–156. https://ajindex.com/articles/535854

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (19)

  1. da Silva JH. Pilonidal cyst: Cause and treatment. Dis Colon Rectum 2000;43:1146–56
  2. Karydakis GE. New approach to the problem of pilonidal sinus. Lancet 1973;2:1414–5
  3. Templeton HJ. Foreign body granuloma or interdigital cysts with hair formation. Arch Dermatol Suyph 1942;46:157-8
  4. Karydakis GE. Easy and successful treatment of pilonidal sinus after explanation of its causative process. Aust N Z J Surg 1992;62:385–9
  5. Akinci OF, Bozer M, Uzunköy A, Düzgün SA, Coşkun A. Incidence and aetiological factors in pilonidal sinus among Turkish soldiers. Eur J Surg 1999;165:339–42
  6. Cosentini E. Knowledge based therapy of pilonidal sinus. Eur Surg 2004;36:166–7
  7. Medscape. Pilonidal cyst and sinus. Available at: http:// emedicine.medscape. com/article/788127-overview. Accessed Aug 30, 2017
  8. NHS. Pilonidal sinus. Available at: https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/pilonidal-sinus/. Accessed Mar 2, 2022
  9. Tocchi A, Mazzoni G, Bononi M, Fornasari V, Miccini M, Drumo A, et al. Outcome of chronic pilonidal disease treatment after ambulatory plain midline excision and primary suture. Am J Surg 2008;196:28–33
  10. Girgin M, Kanat BH, Ayten R, Cetinkaya Z, Kanat Z, Bozdağ A, et al. Minimally invasive treatment of pilonidal disease: Crystallized phenol and laser depilation. Int Surg 2012;97:288–92
  11. Mentes O, Oysul A, Harlak A, Zeybek N, Kozak O, Tufan T. Ultrasonography accurately evaluates the dimension and shape of the pilonidal sinus. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 2009;64:189–92
  12. Tezel E. A new classification according to navicular area concept for sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease. Colorectal Dis 2007;9:575–6
  13. Tezel E, Bostancı H, Azılı C, Kurukahvecioğlu O, Anadol Z. Pilonidal sinüs hastalığı ve tedavisine yeni bir bakış. Marmara Med J 2009;22:85–9
  14. Özben V, Baca B. Pilonidal sinüs hastalığı ve cerrahi tedavisi. Turkiye Klinikleri J Gen Surg-Special Topics 2016;9:55–61
  15. Duman K, Özdemir Y, Sücüllü İ, Akın ML. Sakrokoksigeal pilonidal sinüsün cerrahi tedavisi. Arşiv Kaynak Tarama Derg 2013;22:86–98
  16. Eryilmaz R, Sahin M, Alimoglu O, Dasiran F. Surgical treatment of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus with the Limberg transposition flap. Surgery 2003;134:745–9
  17. Kayaalp C, Aydin C. Review of phenol treatment in sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease. Tech Coloproctol 2009;13:189–93
  18. Stansby G, Greatorex R. Phenol treatment of pilonidal sinuses of the natal cleft. Br J Surg 1989;76:729–30
  19. Dogru O, Camci C, Aygen E, Girgin M, Topuz O.